Multi-Modal Traffic Sign Detection with Semantic Attributes for Autonomous Driving
Organizations: Arriver System Software S.r.l., Romania · Qualcomm Auto Ltd Sweden Filial · Qualcomm Auto Ltd., UK · Automated Driving, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc
Abstract
Reliable traffic sign detection is a prerequisite for the global deployment of autonomous driving systems, where regulatory compliance and road safety depend on perceiving signs correctly across regions, ranges, and weather conditions. Despite recent progress, vision-based methods continue to face three fundamental limitations: poor cross-regional generalization due to high diversity across countries, degraded performance on small-object detection at long ranges (traffic signs occupy as little as pixels at 200m), and fragile temporal tracking under the strongly non-linear perspective distortion that occurs as a vehicle approaches a sign. In this paper, we address the problem of robust, long-range, region-agnostic traffic sign perception by combining camera and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensing. We present a multi-modal detection framework whose Intensity-Aware Deformable Fusion module aligns retro-reflective LiDAR cues with camera features, anchoring detection on geometric invariants rather than region-specific visual appearance. We further introduce a dual motion-model tracker that explicitly accounts for non-linear perspective transformations during vehicle approach, substantially improving temporal consistency over linear motion assumptions. Additionally, we develop a semantic attribute classification pipeline that estimates occlusion level, readability, sign embeddedness, and road relevance, providing actionable context to downstream planning. Extensive evaluation on our dataset, spanning 60+ countries and 2,500+ hours of driving data, shows that the proposed pipeline achieves an Object Miss Ratio (OMR) of 0.49% across 221,068 evaluation sequences, demonstrating globally generalizable traffic sign perception in commercial-grade autonomous driving systems.
Figures & tables
| Dataset | Annotated Objects | Annotation Type | Region | Modality |
| Qualcomm | 142,000,000 | 2D/3D Bounding Box | 60+ Countries | Image + LiDAR |
| Zenseact (ZOD) [ 22 ] | 446,000 | 2D/3D Bounding Box | 14 (Europe) | Image + LiDAR |
| Mapillary (MTSD) [ 21 ] | 300,000 | 2D Bounding Box | 60 Countries | Image Only |
| TT100K [ 18 ] | 26,000 | 2D Bounding Box | China | Image Only |
| GTSDB [ 17 ] | 852 | 2D Bounding Box | Germany | Image Only |
| Method | AP | AP 50 | AP 75 | AP s | AP m | AP l |
| Zenseact dataset | ||||||
| Model trained on ZOD | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.80 | 0.86 |
| Qualcomm dataset | ||||||
| Model trained on ZOD | 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.71 |
| Model trained on Qualcomm | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.90 |
| Algorithm | Recall | Precision |
| Detector + OC-SORT [ 32 ] | 0.68 | 0.70 |
| Detector + BoostTrack++ (Default Parameters) [ 36 ] | 0.69 | 0.72 |
| Detector + Baseline Tracker (Tuned Parameters) | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| + Interpolation | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| + Second order kinematic model | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| + Third order kinematic model | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| Image Backbone | Training Strategy | Class | |||
| 0 | 1 | ||||
| P | R | P | R | ||
| ViT-Base [ 49 ] | From Scratch | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.87 |
| ViT-Base [ 46 ] | LoRA [ 47 ] | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.89 |
| ViT-DINOv2 [ 48 ] | Frozen | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| ViT-DINOv2 [ 48 ] | LoRA [ 47 ] | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| Image Backbone | Training Strategy | Class (%) | |||||||||
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |||||||
| P | R | P | R | P | R | P | R | P | R | ||
| ViT-Base [ 49 ] | From Scratch | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.28 | 0.54 | 0.68 |
| ViT-Base [ 46 ] | LoRA [ 47 ] | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 0.51 |
| ViT-DINOv2 [ 48 ] | Frozen | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| ViT-DINOv2 [ 48 ] | LoRA [ 47 ] | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
| Modality | Class | |||||
| Readable | NotReadable | BackOfSign | ||||
| P | R | P | R | P | R | |
| Camera Only | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| Camera + LiDAR | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.97 |
| Attribute | Recall | Precision |
| Embedded | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Method | Class | Recall | Precision |
| Lane-distance | |||
| Lane-distance | Relevant | 0.89 | 0.54 |
| Lane-distance | NotRelevant | 0.62 | 0.92 |
| Lane-distance + point-inside | |||
| Lane-distance + point-inside | Relevant | 0.89 | 0.64 |
| Lane-distance + point-inside | NotRelevant | 0.67 | 0.90 |
| Method | Traffic Sign Type | Modality | AP |
| Zenseact baseline model | |||
| Zenseact | Front | LiDAR | 0.42 |
| Zenseact | Back | LiDAR | 0.15 |
| Zenseact | All | LiDAR | 0.28 |
| Proposed method | |||
| Ours | All | LiDAR | 0.60 |
| Method | AP | AP 0-50 | AP 50-100 | AP 100-150 | AP 150-200 |
| Qualcomm dataset | |||||
| Single Sweep | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.14 |
| Multi Sweeps | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.20 |
| Method | AP | AP 50 | AP 75 | AP s | AP m | AP l |
| Qualcomm dataset | ||||||
| Camera-only baseline | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0.89 |
| Camera and LiDAR Fusion | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.90 |
| Category | Sequences | Object Miss Ratio |
| Time of Day | ||
| Day | 145,412 | 0.67% |
| Night | 63,641 | 0.17% |
| Dusk/Dawn | 12,395 | 0.36% |
| Road Type | ||
| Urban | 95,806 | 0.32% |