Teaching is a Process: The TOSS Framework for Modeling Human Teaching Decisions in Human-Interactive Robot Learning

Human-robot teaching focuses on enabling nontechnical experts to customize robots according to their needs after deployment. With recent advances in machine learning, human-robot teaching is no longer confined to offline learning where the data gathering step from a human teacher is separated from when the robot learns. Instead, more recent approaches for human-robot teaching focus on coupling human teaching with robot learning. This coupling impacts the structure, timing, and content of the teaching and learning interaction. However, it is currently unclear how such coupling dynamics affect humanrobot teaching effectiveness and human perceptions towards the teaching process. Informed by human learning theories, in this paper we propose a new scale for classifying human-robot teaching interactions according to coupling dynamics present between the human teacher and robot learner. We apply this scale to a subset of the human-robot teaching literature to identify how coupling dynamics and human teacher mental model mismatches with the ground truth robot learning system affect teaching effectiveness and human perceptions towards the teaching process

Human-robot collaboration describes the process of humans and autonomous agents working together to accomplish common goals. This process is facilitated best when robot policies, or behaviors in different situations, are made transparent to humans. Demonstration-based explanations have been a focus of human-robot collaboration research, and the field has frequently drawn upon literature from education to improve how humans are taught robot policies. However, no single teaching method has been proven effective across domains, difficulties, learners, and other variables; the question of how humans can most effectively be taught robot policies remains open. In traditional classrooms, learners are shown erroneous examples, in which they reflect on and correct incorrect responses to understand common pitfalls when learning a concept. We propose using erroneous examples to teach robot policies, extending an existing policy teaching framework. We conduct a user study in which participants view incorrect demonstrations of robot behavior and correct the actions to align with the actual policy. Our findings suggest that viewing these incorrect demonstrations and verbalizing one's reasoning in predicting a robot's actions improves retention of the policy over time, in agreement with the effect of erroneous examples in classrooms. We also categorize participants into distinct learning styles and establish that participants using inverse reinforcement learning-like reasoning perform best on policy prediction tasks. With this work, we aim to advance the methods by which robots educate humans on their policies.

Instructing robots from demonstrations can be done through different teaching modalities, each with different usability and performance trade-offs. This paper compares kinesthetic guidance, joystick teleoperation, and hand gestures in a user study with eight participants. We evaluate replay success, modified NASA-TLX workload, and common teaching errors across three manipulation tasks. Kinesthetic guidance produced the shortest demonstrations, lowest workload, and highest success on the more orientation-sensitive and contact-rich tasks. Joystick teleoperation performed best on simple peg picking. Hand-gesture teaching, although less reliable overall, performed better than expected and in some cases achieved results comparable to kinesthetic guidance.