Industrial actor--critic methods usually represent continuous actions as anonymous numerical coordinates. They must therefore learn from limited interactions which process variables each action affects, in which direction, and after what delay. Fixed industrial documents already describe part of these relations, but their open-text statements neither represent the current operating condition nor directly fit a numerical policy. This article presents LLM-Guided Contextual Action Evaluation for Operational Decisions in Industrial Processes (LCAE), which uses a large language model before training to normalize fixed documents into a frozen action--observation--direction--delay relation basis. Recent numerical action--response history then modulates the current strength of each relation, while the evaluated action forms a state-conditioned nonlinear action-effect field in the same basis. The critic evaluates actions through this field, and the actor uses the same relation gains to generate actions, making document semantics part of maximum-entropy policy learning. Neither the LLM nor the embedding model runs online during training or deployment; the deployed policy uses only frozen semantic artifacts and visible numerical history. The method states a falsifiable hypothesis: when documented relations are correct and recent history reflects their contextual strength, this action representation should provide a more useful decision bias than raw action coordinates.
Modern large language model (LLM) agents do not simply need longer contexts; they need decision-relevant evidence at the moment of action. We study decision-aware context selection: ranking retrieved files, tests, traces, rules, and memories by their expected effect on an agent's next action rather than by semantic similarity alone. We present the Counterfactual-Inspired Context Layer (CICL), which builds an instance context graph, estimates decision-oriented utility for candidate units, and compresses selected evidence into typed memory cards. The same schema can be instantiated with hosted LLM judges, local surrogates, or lightweight rankers, making the selection protocol auditable across model choices. On 50 SWE-bench Verified file-retrieval instances, Qwen3.6-Plus reranking of BM25 top-50 candidates improves hit@1 from 0.58 to 0.78 and MRR@10 from 0.634 to 0.790, with all 2,500 judgments parseable. Controlled diagnostics show that CICL identifies action-critical evidence: removing the top-utility semantic unit reduces F1 from 0.245 to 0.000. In selected-then-compressed mode, memory cards save 44.93 tokens per query while preserving selected evidence. CICL provides a practical layer for measuring, ranking, and compressing decision-critical context for tool-using agents. Code is available at https://github.com/stephen-guan-researcher/CICL.
LLM agents are deployed in environments where they must interact to acquire information. In these scenarios, the agent must reason about inherent cost-uncertainty tradeoffs in how to act, such as when to stop exploring and commit to an answer. For instance, on a programming task, an agent might run the code it generates, or it might generate tests for that code snippet; the cost of writing and running a test is nonzero, but typically lower than the cost of running buggy code. In this work, we show that we can induce LLM agents to explicitly reason about balancing these cost-uncertainty tradeoffs, then act more optimally in their environments. We formalize multiple tasks, including retrieval-augmented QA and a file reading coding task, as sequential decision-making problems under uncertainty. Each problem has latent environment state that impacts the agent's performance. We introduce a framework called Calibrate-Then-Act (CTA), where we pass the agent an inferred prior about this environment state to enable it to act more optimally. This information qualitatively changes agent behavior, and adds environment sensitivity to the agent which is not learned via standard RL training. Our results on a synthetic task, QA, and file reading show that making cost-benefit tradeoffs explicit with CTA helps agents discover more optimal decision-making strategies.
We study how to build more capable general-purpose agents by extending large language models (LLMs) with native typed decision-making. We introduce Dyad, an architecture that augments a pretrained LLM with an environment-conditioned action encoder that embeds each candidate action description in parallel, then scores these embeddings against the LLM's internal state to yield a distribution over typed actions. By factorizing decision-making into representations of the evolving interaction state and environment-specific action semantics, Dyad introduces an inductive bias for learning reusable representations while keeping action scoring efficient even as the action space grows. We investigate two complementary reinforcement learning settings driven by environment interaction. With the LLM frozen, training the action encoder alone achieves consistent gains across four unseen environments, enabling modular adaptation without modifying any LLM parameters. Jointly optimizing both components outperforms conventional RL post-training across diverse interactive tasks and model scales, including a 3.80% average absolute gain on ALFWorld with a 9B model, while improving general knowledge, reasoning, and coding.
Yundaichuan Zhan, Weishi Wang, Wenbiao Liu +5
Zhejiang University · SAP · Central South University +3