eess.IVAug 23, 2026

Modality Contribution Score - A Per-Patient Framework for Quantifying the Relative Diagnostic Contribution of Structural MRI and Amyloid PET in Alzheimer's Disease

Authors: Dawa Chyophel Lepcha, Aaliya Ali, Sophie A. Martin, Deepika Koundal, Pierrick Coupe, Shabbir Syed-Abdul

Organizations: Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 235, Taiwan. · International Center for Health Information Technology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 235, Taiwan. · Biomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA · Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India · UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK · Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London,UK · School of Computer Science, UPES, Dehradun, 24800, Uttarakhand, India · University of Eastern Finland, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland · CNRS, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, LABRI, UMR5800, Talence F-33405, France · School of Gerontology and Long-term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 110.

Abstract

Multimodal neuroimaging combining structural MRI and positron emission tomography (PET) captures complementary structure-function relationships across the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum, yet existing artificial intelligence systems produce a single diagnostic label without quantifying which imaging modality drove that decision for a specific patient. We introduce the Modality Contribution Network (MCNet) and the Modality Contribution Score (MCS), the first per-patient attribution framework quantifying the shift in modality dominance from structural atrophy to amyloid and metabolic dysfunction across the cognitively normal to MCI to AD continuum. MCS is normalised to unity per subject via modality ablation (MCS_MRI_i + MCS_PET_i = 1.0 for every subject i), providing an interpretable, clinically actionable score that fluid biomarkers cannot supply. Applied to 327 ADNI-3 participants balanced across cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, and AD groups, MCNet achieved competitive three-class staging performance (AUC=0.881). The MCS revealed a statistically significant monotonic gradient (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.0001), with increasing PET dominance from cognitively normal (MCS_PET 0.412+/-0.229) through MCI (0.489+/-0.289) to AD (0.671+/-0.426), validated against amyloid SUVR (r=0.172, p=0.006) and FDG metabolic biomarkers (r=-0.287, p=0.0005) from separate imaging pipelines. External replication in 1,073 independent OASIS-3 subjects confirmed cross-cohort generalisability (H=166.99, p<0.0001, eta^2=0.156). A mechanistic comparison with SHAP demonstrated that ablation-based MCS captures clinically meaningful modality dependence that deviation-based methods cannot. These findings position MCNet as a foundation for personalised imaging decisions, clinical trial stratification, and trustworthy AI in dementia care.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Evidence Before Accuracy: A MRI-PET Fusion Network for Alzheimer Disease Classification with Causal Regional Validation

    Sep 28, 2026Saeid Firouzi Daghigh, Saeed AyatAlzheimer's Disease ClassificationExplainable Medical Image Analysis

  2. Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis using a Multimodal Approach with 3D MRI and PET

    Jun 18, 2026Loukas Ilias, Anthi-Maria Vozinaki, Christos Ntanos +1Medical Diagnosis3D Medical Imaging

  3. Anatomical Grounding and Leakage-Aware Multimodal Contrastive Learning for Alzheimer's Disease Classification from Structural MRI

    Sep 14, 2026Paul-Gabriel Nicolae, Irina Georgiana MocanuData LeakageAlzheimer's Disease Classification