Agent skills package specialized knowledge and workflows into reusable resources that extend AI agent capabilities. Recent work automatically discovers such skills from agent experience, which enables agents to progressively adapt through interaction. However, the insights that guide skill development typically remain scattered across optimization histories, limiting their systematic reuse across iterations. We introduce WikiSkill, a framework that co-evolves agent skills with a persistent knowledge base (wiki). At a high level, WikiSkill separates raw execution experience, accumulated knowledge, and executable skills, while continuously consolidating experience into the wiki, which subsequent skill updates can build on. Across diverse benchmarks and models, WikiSkill consistently outperforms state-of-the-art skill-evolution methods and improves over no-skill baselines in most model-benchmark settings. We find that skill evolution complements model scaling: larger models generally benefit more from evolved skills, while smaller models with skills can outperform substantially larger models without them. We also find that evolved skills transfer effectively across models and model families, and skills evolved by other models can outperform self-evolved skills. Finally, our ablation studies confirm that persistent knowledge accumulation in the wiki is critical for effective skill evolution. These results demonstrate the benefits of systematically accumulating and refining agent experience for developing reusable and transferable skills.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: WikiSkill consistently improves over both the no-skill baseline and existing skill-evolution methods. Interestingly, its advantage becomes more pronounced for stronger models. We report average accuracy across the evaluated benchmarks for each model using no skills or skills evolved by EvoSkill, SkillOpt, and WikiSkill (see Table 1 for details).
Figure 2: Overview of the WikiSkill framework. The agent workspace is structured into three layers: immutable execution traces (Raw Layer), a persistent knowledge base that compounds across iterations (Wiki Layer), and active procedural instructions (Skills Layer). In each evolutionary loop, the Inference Agent runs rollouts (injecting active skills but restricting Wiki access), the Wiki Maintainer consolidates traces into the Wiki, and the Skill Proposer (with the ReAct mechanism) suggests updates while the Wiki is retained across all iterations.
Model
Method
LiveMath
SealQA
SpreadSheet
OfficeQA
ALFWorld
Avg.
Qwen-3.5-4B
No skill
29.1
32.5
14.6
30.2
24.4
26.2
Trace2Skill
31.5
37.6
17.5
31.0
42.8
32.1
EvoSkill
41.7
37.3
18.6
29.5
41.5
33.7
SkillOpt
48.7
33.3
14.0
34.5
45.3
35.2
WikiSkill
49.7
39.4
21.1
28.5
53.7
38.5
Qwen-3.5-9B
No skill
28.2
26.3
24.3
35.9
34.7
29.9
Table 1: Method comparison across inference models and test sets . Each horizontal block evaluates a specific inference model without skills (No skill) and with skills developed by different skill-evolution methods. To ensure a fair comparison, all skill-evolution methods start with an empty skill set, and evolved skills are injected into the Inference Agent’s prompt at inference time . All reported scores are the average test performance across three independent runs of the full evolution process. Our method ( WikiSkill ) is highlighted. Bold indicates the best performance for each dataset; multiple bold results indicate methods that are not significantly different from the best under a paired bootstrap test with 1,000 iterations ( p<0.05 ).
Model
Skill Source
LiveMath
SealQA
SpreadSheet
OfficeQA
ALFWorld
Qwen-3.5-4B
None
29.1
32.5
14.6
30.2
24.4
Qwen-3.5-4B
49.7
39.4
21.1
28.5
53.7
Qwen-3.6-27B
59.7
38.8
33.0
25.4
57.0
Gemini-3.5-Flash
62.6
37.3
23.0
32.2
-
Qwen-3.5-9B
None
28.2
26.3
24.3
35.9
34.7
Qwen-3.5-4B
61.0
40.4
25.0
40.3
69.2
Table 2: Cross-model skill transfer results. We evaluate inference models using no skills (None) and skills evolved by WikiSkill with Qwen-3.5-4B, Qwen-3.6-27B, and Gemini-3.5-Flash as source models. Skills are injected into the Inference Agent’s system prompt at inference time. Highlighted rows indicate self-evolved skills, where the inference model and skill source are the same. The highest performance per benchmark within each model block is bolded. ‘ − ’ indicates that the source model reached 100% validation performance before skill evolution, so no skill was evolved.
WikiSkill Components
Benchmarks
Inference Agent
Skill Proposer
LiveMath
SealQA
SpreadSheet
OfficeQA
Avg.
Wiki Access
Wiki Access
No skill
33.0
29.4
50.5
48.6
40.4
43.8
42.0
44.4
51.0
45.3
51.3
38.4
49.9
55.2
48.7
64.8
42.8
80.2
55.6
60.9
Table 3: Ablation study on WikiSkill using Gemini-3.5-Flash. We evaluate performance across benchmarks under four configurations that vary whether the Inference Agent and Skill Proposer have wiki access during skill evolution. When the Skill Proposer has no Wiki access, we also remove the Wiki Maintainer, eliminating persistent knowledge accumulation across iterations. The bottom row represents our default WikiSkill configuration.
Figure 3: Case study of Wiki-guided skill evolution on ALFWorld (Qwen-3.6-27B). The persistent Wiki Layer compiles cross-iteration patterns, an audit trail of past proposal diffs and acceptance decisions, and chronological history. Informed by the rejection of the skill proposal at Iteration 0, the proposer synthesizes the accepted skill update at Iteration 1, and later refines it with new pattern evidence. File contents are simplified for clarity.
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Category
Early (Iter 0–1)
Mid (Iter 2–4)
Late (Iter 5–7)
By Model
Qwen-3.5-4B
39%
39%
21%
Qwen-3.5-9B
52%
30%
19%
Qwen-3.6-27B
43%
40%
17%
Gemma-4-31B
52%
37%
11%
Gemini-3.5-Flash
50%
46%
4%
Appendix
Table 5: Distribution of accepted skill updates across evolution iterations, grouped by model (top) and benchmark (bottom). Percentages indicate the proportion of accepted updates that occur during each stage of evolution.
Benchmark
Interaction
Train
Val
Test
Environment Tools
LiveMath
Single-Step
35
18
124
None (Direct Reasoning)
SealQA
Multi-Step
16
10
85
web_search , read_file
SpreadSheet
Multi-Step
80
40
280
bash
OfficeQA
Multi-Step
50
24
172
glob , grep , read
ALFWorld
Multi-Step
39
18
134
Admissible Actions
Appendix
Table 6: Benchmark statistics, data splits, interaction modes, and available environment tools.
Framework
Per-Iteration Formula
Complexity
Trace2Skill
Ntrain+(1+c−11)BNtrain+1
O(Ntrain+BNtrain)
EvoSkill
B2Ntrain
O(BNtrain)
SkillOpt
BKopt⋅Ntrain
O(BNtrain)
WikiSkill
(1+TReAct)BNtrain
O(BNtrain)
Appendix
Table 7: Comparison of optimizer API call complexity per evolution iteration across self-improving agent frameworks. Ntrain=∣Dtrain∣ denotes the number of training tasks, B denotes the batch size, TReAct denotes the number of interactive ReAct reasoning turns used by the Skill Proposer agent in WikiSkill, Kopt denotes the number of reflection and merging calls per step in SkillOpt, and c denotes the reduction-tree branching factor in Trace2Skill. WikiSkill uses B=Ntrain across all datasets. In full-batch mode, WikiSkill’s optimizer call count is independent of training set size Ntrain , requiring 1+TReAct optimizer calls per iteration.
Large language model (LLM) agents can continually improve without parameter updates by converting historical experience into reusable procedural knowledge. However, existing methods often consolidate experience based on semantic similarity or LLM judgments, which may merge superficially related but behaviorally incompatible strategies and thereby degrade performance. To address the issue, we propose SkillCommit, an online skill evolution framework that continuously transforms experience into a hierarchical library of reusable skills. Rather than generalizing from individual experiences immediately, SkillCommit first preserves each experience as an instance-specific patch, retaining its locally validated behavior. As patches accumulate, SkillCommit abstracts those sharing a common behavioral mechanism into higher-level skills. Specifically, for each incoming skill, embedding-based retrieval first identifies candidate related skills. Cross-instance replay and an LLM-based mechanism check determine whether these skills transfer across cases and share a common underlying mechanism. Candidates that pass both checks are abstracted into a higher-level skill and committed only if it preserves the validated behavior of all constituent skills. Experiments on RuleArena, OpenExempt and KOR-Bench demonstrate that SkillCommit consistently improves agent performance across diverse domains. Moreover, the learned skills transfer across model scales and families, enabling cross-model experience transfer.
Yu He, Weikai Yang
Nanjing University · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)
A persistent skill library allows language model agents to reuse successful strategies across tasks. Maintaining such a library requires three coupled capabilities. The agent selects a relevant skill, utilizes it during execution, and distills new skills from experience. Existing methods optimize these capabilities in isolation or with separate reward sources, resulting in partial and conflicting evolution. We propose Skill1, a framework that trains a single policy to co-evolve skill selection, utilization, and distillation toward a shared task-outcome objective. The policy generates a query to search the skill library, re-ranks candidates to select one, solves the task conditioned on it, and distills a new skill from the trajectory. All learning derives from a single task-outcome signal. Its low-frequency trend credits selection and its high-frequency variation credits distillation. Experiments on ALFWorld and WebShop show that Skill1 outperforms prior skill-based and reinforcement learning baselines. Training dynamics confirm the co-evolution of the three capabilities, and ablations show that removing any credit signal degrades the evolution.
Yaorui Shi, Yuxin Chen, Zhengxi Lu +6
University of Science and Technology of China · 2Meituan · 3National University of Singapore +2
Agent skills turn procedural knowledge into reusable artifacts, allowing LLM agents to accumulate and refine expertise through experience. Building on this, skill evolution iteratively improves skills using execution feedback. However, improvement may require several interdependent edits, so low-reward versions can still be worth developing. Requiring immediate reward gains can discard useful partial repairs before their benefits emerge. Non-elitist evolution allows new versions to receive further edits despite scoring below earlier ones. For agent skills, this calls for evidence of what to preserve and repair next. We introduce SkillNEO (Non-Elitist Evolutionary Optimization for Agent Skills), which separately selects a version to use and versions to keep improving. Comparing how related versions perform the same task reveals working steps to preserve and remaining failures to fix. It can also revisit and revise earlier versions using later evidence. Across 86 SkillsBench tasks in eight domains, including software engineering and office work, SkillNEO raises GPT-5.4 Mini's average reward from 49.1% to 66.4%, within GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 Luna's original-skill range. Mini executes tasks, proposes revisions, and edits skills; final evaluation uses the same task instances. Gains span all eight domains. The same skills improve stronger models without further editing. On the 41 tasks with modified skills, reuse improves Luna by 10.5 percentage points and places GPT-5.5 10.6 points above its published original-skill reference. Execution records show these skills can benefit stronger models even when Mini still fails some task requirements. Search histories also show lower-scoring versions leading to skills ultimately selected for use. Together, these findings show that skill evolution can turn a weaker model's partial progress into reusable procedural knowledge for improving more capable agents.
Enze Ma, Chunyu Miao, Yankai Chen +14
University of Illinois at Chicago · Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence · Independent Researcher +3