Automated Analysis Framework for Multilingual Climate-Health Literature Based on Multi-Agent Large Language Model
Organizations: Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China · Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd · Renmin University of China, Beijing, China · School of Information and AI, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China ·
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of interdisciplinary and multilingual scientific literature has left traditional manual analysis and single-algorithm methods plagued by low efficiency, poor scalability, and insufficient domain adaptability. Targeting the literature analysis needs of the typical interdisciplinary climate-health field, this study proposes a multi-agent large language model automated analysis framework for multilingual scientific literature, which realizes full-process automation covering literature screening, structured information extraction, and standardized integration. With a central coordination module as the core, the framework deploys three dedicated agents for document evaluation, information extraction, and analytical review to mimic the literature analysis thinking of domain experts, and adopts a four-layer hallucination control strategy together with a manual verification procedure to ensure the accuracy and reliability of analytical outcomes. Validated on a bilingual Chinese-English corpus of 32,642 climate-health papers covering China from 1993 to 2023, the framework achieves an F1 score of 0.92 in core information extraction, and completes the extraction and standardization of 2,012 city-literature association pairs, offering effective technical support for large-scale evidence mining in the climate-health research domain.
Figures & tables
| Extraction Task | Precision (P) | Recall (R) | F1-Score (F1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geographic Information (City) | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Climate Exposure Factor | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| Health Outcome | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Overall Average | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Method | Precision (P) | Recall (R) | F1-Score (F1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single LLM (full merged prompt) | 0.84 0.02 | 0.81 0.03 | 0.82 0.02 |
| BERT - based domain NER ( Devlin et al. 2019 ) | 0.86 0.03 | 0.83 0.02 | 0.84 0.01 |
| AutoGen (sequential multi - agent) ( Wu et al. 2023 ) | 0.88 0.02 | 0.86 0.02 | 0.87 0.02 |
| LiRA (Literature Review Agents) ( Go et al. 2026 ) | 0.89 0.01 | 0.87 0.02 | 0.88 0.03 |
| Paper Circle ( Kumar et al. 2026 ) | 0.91 0.02 | 0.90 0.01 | 0.90 0.02 |
| Ours (full modular agent pipeline) | 0.93 0.01 | 0.92 0.01 | 0.92 0.01 |
| Variant | Precision (P) | Recall (R) | F1-Score (F1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single - agent (all tasks in one agent) | 0.84 0.02 | 0.81 0.03 | 0.83 0.02 |
| Two - agent (appraiser + merged extractor - analyst) | 0.89 0.02 | 0.88 0.02 | 0.88 0.02 |
| Three - agent (our full pipeline) | 0.93 0.01 | 0.92 0.01 | 0.92 0.01 |
| Variant | Precision | Recall | F1 - score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ours (full system) | 0.93 0.01 | 0.92 0.01 | 0.92 0.01 |
| w/o central coordination module | 0.91 0.02 | 0.89 0.02 | 0.90 0.02 |
| w/o cross - agent verification | 0.89 0.02 | 0.88 0.01 | 0.88 0.02 |
| w/o confidence - score filtering | 0.87 0.01 | 0.90 0.02 | 0.88 0.01 |
| w/o external knowledge - base filtering | 0.88 0.02 | 0.87 0.02 | 0.87 0.02 |
LLM Information Extraction
Large language model information extraction converts unstructured documents into structured entities, relations, events, and records.
See all 238 papers