Do Medical Vision Models Reason About Anatomy? Probing the Spatial Inductive Biases of Learned Visual Representations

Reliable spatial understanding is an important prerequisite for future medical vision-language systems that aim to support radiological report generation and structured image understanding. While modern vision-language models (VLMs) show promising performance on many medical imaging tasks, recent evidence suggests they remain weak in controlled spatial reasoning and often fail to reliably ground spatial relations in image evidence. Given that radiological reasoning hinges on understanding the relative positions of anatomical structures and findings, this spatial weakness poses risks to diagnostic accuracy. We present a modular medical imaging agent for binary spatial relation verification in axial CT slices. Instead of directly predicting spatial answers end-to-end, the system decomposes the task into explicit stages: language parsing, anatomical localization, and deterministic geometric verification. Natural-language queries are converted into structured relation tuples, queried organs are localized with a YOLO-based detector, and the final spatial decision is computed from object centers using deterministic geometric rules. We evaluate the approach on the held-out MIRP spatial QA benchmark and compare it against representative end-to-end VLM baselines. The best-performing hybrid configuration reaches 94.1% accuracy and 94.2% F1, outperforming direct Qwen2-VL prompting by 42.5 percentage points in accuracy, while preserving interpretable intermediate representations and auditable reasoning stages. The results suggest that explicit modular spatial verification can serve as a promising building block for future report-oriented medical imaging agents.

Large vision-language models are becoming increasingly dominant in 3D medical image interpretation, but we rarely know <i>which</i> internal units encode clinical findings or <i>where</i> that information lives in the representation. We first study this on a 3D chest vision-language model (Pillar-0) by probing its frozen vision embeddings. We show that (i) each radiological finding is encoded by a <i>sparse</i> set of ~10 vision-encoder channels that match full-feature classification performance and far exceed a zero-shot text prompting; (ii) turning off the channels tied to one finding, that finding's score collapses while unrelated labels stay stable; and (iii) the same sparse probe <i>replicates</i> on an architecturally unrelated 3D abdominal VLM (Merlin) suggesting a general property of frozen medical encoders. Our training-free concept channel probe (CCP) method, paired with a corpus-derived report template, outperforms published CT-CHAT on clinical efficacy and NLG metrics (F1 0.549 vs. 0.184; BLEU 0.483 vs. 0.373) at 22x lower latency. Our results provide a clear, reproducible characterization of how frozen medical encoders represent findings, demonstrating direct applicability across models.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being evaluated for medical imaging, but many available benchmarks emphasize disease classification, report generation, or broad visual question answering rather than the spatial and anatomical reasoning required for radiology. We developed the Spatial Perception and Anatomical Reasoning in Clinical Radiology (SPARC-Rad) Benchmark, a manually curated multimodal benchmark dataset and evaluation pipeline for assessing these capabilities in radiology VLMs. SPARC-Rad includes 300 image-question pairs derived from healthy control imaging studies in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), spanning CT, MRI, and radiography across the abdomen, chest, breast, neuro, and musculoskeletal categories. Radiology trainees manually designed and annotated questions to evaluate anatomical identification, localization, laterality, regional recognition, device identification, and inter-structure spatial relationships. The evaluation pipeline supports standardized prompting, structured output collection, response normalization, LLM-as-judge grading, human quality review, binary correctness scoring, and subgroup analysis by modality, anatomy, and reasoning type. SPARC-Rad provides a reusable framework for evaluating whether VLMs can provide reasoning for radiologic anatomy as a spatial system, supporting future model development, failure-mode analysis, and pre-deployment assessment.