cs.ROSep 14, 2026

Tuning ROS 2 for Energy-Efficient Navigation: Empirical Insights from Costmap 2D Configurations

Authors: Michel AlbonicoAndreas WortmannIvano Malavolta

Abstract

Robots are increasingly used in diverse application areas, where autonomous navigation plays a central role. As these systems become more widespread, improving their energy efficiency is critical to extending operational time and reducing environmental impact. The Robot Operating System (ROS) is a widely adopted middleware for robotics, offering a rich set of configurable packages. However, this flexibility can result in suboptimal software configurations in dynamic environments, negatively affecting both performance and energy consumption. This paper investigates the impact of ROS 2 package reconfigurations on the energy efficiency of mobile robot navigation. We conduct a controlled experiment in two warehouse-like scenarios (small and large) with varying obstacle layouts and Costmap 2D configurations (essential to the Nav2 stack). Through repeated trials, we measure energy usage, power profile, CPU load, memory consumption, and navigation performance. Results show that configurations must be carefully chosen for the specific robotic environment, and we were able to identify critical settings that lead to good and poor performance and energy consumption.

Explore similar work

Jun 9, 2026cs.RO

ros2probe: Non-intrusive, Kernel-selective Observability for Robot Operating System 2 Middleware

Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2), the de facto standard middleware framework for robots, runs each robot as a graph of nodes communicating over the Data Distribution Service (DDS), a publish/subscribe substrate. Observing this inter-node communication in real time is essential to robot development, yet it has a price. A tool can receive data only by joining the DDS domain as a subscriber that discovery has matched to the publisher, so observing folds the tool into the system it measures and perturbs it. We define this protocol-inherent perturbation as the observer's probe effect. It inflates the discovery plane, adds deserialization cost on the observer, makes the loss it reports diverge from what the subscriber actually received, and near saturation displaces the subscriber's messages. The only escape, capturing all wire traffic passively, discards ROS 2 message semantics and scales with total traffic, not what is observed. We present ros2probe, a non-intrusive observation framework that removes the probe effect. It reconstructs the full ROS 2 communication state from the domain's discovery packets at no bandwidth cost, then drives an in-kernel filter restricted to the topics the user asks for, lifting only those packets at minimal cost and observing what the real subscriber receives. Its interfaces and recordings match the standard ROS 2 tools. Across three hardware platforms (laptop, Jetson, and Raspberry Pi), two DDS implementations, and seven robot-operation workloads, ros2probe holds the discovery graph within 0.5% of an unobserved system, whereas domain-joining tools inflate discovery up to 2.6×\times and drop 38.5% of the subscriber's messages at saturation while ros2probe drops none. It reports loss with a recall of 1.0, cuts observer CPU and memory by up to 7×\times and 28×\times, and stays practical on the embedded robots where existing tools overload the system.
Jisang Yu, Sanghoon Lee, Yeonwoo Choi +1
Date pendingcs.RO

Obstacle-Aware Autonomous Coverage and Navigation for Outdoor Robots

Long-duration outdoor coverage with autonomous platforms remains challenging beyond classical planning: deployments face localization drift in open spaces, obstacles in cluttered sites, controller feasibility in turn-heavy maneuvers, and persistent autonomy with energy management. We propose a unified ROS 2 architecture for single-robot outdoor coverage: a dual-antenna RTK-GNSS fused in an EKF keeps both position and heading accurate across long missions; three controller-aware refinements extend a mature coverage planner; a Nav2-based behavior-tree mission executive coordinates multi-goal execution, layered recovery, cost-aware goal management, and autonomous docking for return-to-charge. In real-world trials across five outdoor areas with varying geometries and obstacle densities, the robot completed every coverage route, sweeping 93.1% to 96.1% of the planned coverage area.
Leonardo Gargani, Matteo Frosi, Matteo Matteucci
Jul 1, 2026cs.RO

The Three Dimensions of ROS 2 Middleware

ROS 2 (Robot Operating System 2) has emerged as the de facto standard for modern robot software development, with middleware implementations such as the Data Distribution Service (DDS) and Zenoh forming the core infrastructure for distributed robotic communication. Despite their architectural flexibility, these middleware systems exhibit structural limitations, particularly under dynamic and resource-constrained wireless environments. This paper presents a systematic survey of ROS 2 middleware and introduces a conceptual framework to examine its architectural limits through three structural dimensions required by distributed robotic systems, namely Space, Time, and State. We first provide a structured analysis of middleware architecture and operational dynamics, including discovery, data exchange, and state management mechanisms. Building on this foundation, we formalize Time as temporal predictability for control loops, Space as spatial abstraction from physical topology to enable modular deployment, and State as contextual continuity despite dynamic node participation and intermittent connectivity. Through a comprehensive review of existing implementations and prior studies, we organize middleware research according to the structural trade-offs that arise among these dimensions. Under constrained wireless conditions, spatial abstraction can obscure network variability and weaken temporal guarantees, while mechanisms that preserve state continuity introduce computational and network overhead that competes with time-critical communication. These interactions reveal structural trade-offs that characterize the practical limits of contemporary robot middleware. By synthesizing architectural patterns and identifying gaps in current modeling and analysis approaches, this survey outlines a principled research roadmap for robust and scalable robotic middleware architectures.
Sanghoon Lee, Taehun Kim, Angelo Corsaro +1