This paper investigates easy strategies to boost the performance of existing networks for lidar semantic scene completion (SSC) without requiring complex architectural redesigns. The fact is that, over the last years, SSC methods have mostly pursued architectural innovations, making the models heavier and more complex, e.g., by jointly training a point cloud semantic segmentation branch. In this work, we take a step back and explore two priors used as simple ingredients (possibly noisy) to improve existing approaches: semantic pseudo-labels and sensor visibility information. Concretely, we provide both kinds of information directly as additional inputs to a given SSC network, requiring only a minimal adaptation of the original architecture. We first demonstrate that endowing input point clouds with semantic pseudo-labels from off-the-shelf segmenters significantly improves the performance of existing SSC models. In fact, by evaluating these models against an oracle, we establish that high-quality semantic priors are a primary driver of semantic gains (mIoU), and that the SSC model can be trained just once with ground-truth semantics and then exploited without retraining using any segmenter. Furthermore, we equip the input lidar point cloud with visibility information that distinguishes between empty spaces (between the lidar and a scanned point) and unknown spaces (outside of lines of sight), providing a secondary performance boost across the tested architectures. We study the design space of data for representing visibility information and bound the remaining headroom with a ground-truth oracle on the free-space labels. On SemanticKITTI, these enhancements make older models competitive with state-of-the-art systems across four architectures, in one case even outperforming them. On the SSCBench-nuScenes benchmark, both priors also transfer with the sparser 32-beam sensor.
This paper investigates "free lunch" strategies to boost the performance of lidar semantic scene completion (SSC) without requiring complex architectural redesigns. We first demonstrate that endowing input point clouds with semantic pseudo-labels from off-the-shelf segmentors significantly improves the performance of existing architectures. By evaluating these models against an oracle, we establish that high-quality semantic priors are a primary driver of mIoU gains. Furthermore, we equip the input lidar scan with visibility information that distinguishes between empty and unknown spaces, which provides a secondary performance boost across the tested architectures. Using these simple enhancements, we observe that older models remain competitive with state-of-the-art systems, and can even outperform them. Our code is available at https://github.com/astra-vision/SSC-Priors.
Tetiana Martyniuk, Jonathan Seele, Alexandre Boulch +3
Should a completion model spend extra test-time compute by iterating, or spend a similar parameter budget on a wider one-shot predictor? The answer is easily confounded by denoising curricula, corruption augmentation, capacity, and unpaired evaluation. We study this question in LiDAR semantic scene completion by comparing a one-shot predictor, a parameter-matched wider predictor, and a weight-tied multigrid refiner initialized from the same frozen predictor. The protocol separates coherent region removal, independent thinning, range-dependent attenuation, and additive clutter while preserving exact scene-condition pairing. Across five training seeds and 815 SemanticKITTI sequence-08 frames, the full iterative system improves mIoU over the wide control by 0.911 points under contiguous angular removal, with a 95% moving-block bootstrap interval of [0.804, 1.040] that clears a predeclared 0.5-point practical margin. Under independent 75% thinning, iteration adds only 0.300 points [0.166, 0.436], whereas observation-family augmentation adds 5.975 points [5.662, 6.140]. Neither intervention repairs additive clutter. The iterative system also costs 10.74 ms and 0.75 GiB per frame, versus 6.25 ms and 0.23 GiB for the wide control. These results establish a geometry-conditioned empirical boundary rather than a universal advantage: coherent gaps can justify fixed-depth refinement, broadly thinned evidence is addressed more effectively by training coverage, and spurious evidence requires a different robustness mechanism.
Annotating large-scale LiDAR point clouds for 3D semantic segmentation is costly and time-consuming, which motivates the use of semi-supervised learning (SemiSL). Standard LiDAR SemiSL methods typically adopt a two-step training paradigm, where pseudo-labels are separately generated from a single distillation source, either from the same or another LiDAR representation. Such supervision relies on a unique source of pseudo-labels, which can reinforce confirmation bias and propagate errors during training, ultimately limiting performance. To address this challenge, we introduce CoLLiS, a novel framework that leverages Collaborative Learning for LiDAR Semi-supervised segmentation. Unlike prior paradigms with decoupled pseudo-labeling and training phases, CoLLiS trains multiple representations collaboratively in a single step by treating them as coequal students. Each student is adaptively distilled from multiple representations, while inter-student disparities are monitored online to resolve contradictory supervision and effectively mitigate confirmation bias. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate that CoLLiS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LiDAR SemiSL methods, with particularly strong gains in low-label regimes.