cs.CLAug 17, 2026

Evaluating Fine-Tuned and Base Language Models in Maternal and Vaccination Healthcare for African Settings

Authors: Abdulquddus Ajibade, Oluwaseun Odunsi, Iyinoluwa Animasaun, Chioma Nwakanma-Akanno, Oluwasegun Oguntuase, Oluwafunke Akinbuwa, Abiodun Adereni

Organizations: HelpMum, Nigeria

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) can improve healthcare information delivery in low-resource settings but may produce inaccurate or culturally inappropriate advice. This study evaluated domain-specific fine-tuning for maternal health and vaccination in Nigeria. Objective: To compare HelpMum's MamaBot-Llama and Vax-Llama with Meta's Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct for accuracy, safety, clarity, contextual appropriateness, and trustworthiness. Methods: We evaluated 200 healthcare questions, 100 each for maternal health and vaccination, across five subdomains per domain. MamaBot-Llama and Vax-Llama were fine-tuned using Low-Rank Adaptation on over 36,000 maternal health and 9,000 vaccination question-answer pairs, respectively. Two Nigerian licensed physicians independently rated responses using a 5-point Likert scale. Paired comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Performance varied by domain. MamaBot-Llama significantly outperformed the base model across all criteria, with a 4.9% overall improvement (p < .001), including gains in clinical trustworthiness (+7%) and medical accuracy (+5%). Critical issues decreased by 50%, and clinicians preferred it in 78% of cases. In contrast, Vax-Llama showed a 5.2% overall decline (p < .001), with critical issues increasing by 192% and safety concerns by 400%. Conclusions: Domain-specific fine-tuning can improve healthcare LLM performance when based on high-quality, clinician-curated data, but may also degrade performance when dataset quality is inadequate. Rigorous domain-specific validation is essential before clinical deployment. Physician evaluators provided informed consent, and chatbot logs were anonymized. Keywords: Large language models; Fine-tuning; Maternal health; Vaccination; Healthcare AI; Low-resource settings; Nigeria; Model evaluation; LoRA; Medical accuracy

More in this topic

Medical LLMs

Medical large language models are AI systems adapted to clinical and biomedical data for health reasoning, information extraction, and communication.

See all 396 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList
Mar 13, 2026

Developing and evaluating a chatbot to support maternal health care

The ability to provide trustworthy maternal health information using phone-based chatbots can have a significant impact, particularly in low-resource settings where users have low health literacy and limited access to care. However, deploying such systems is technically challenging: user queries are short, underspecified, and code-mixed across languages, answers require regional context-specific grounding, and partial or missing symptom context makes safe routing decisions difficult. We present a chatbot for maternal health in India developed through a partnership between academic researchers, a health tech company, a public health nonprofit, and a hospital. The system combines (1) stage-aware triage, routing high-risk queries to expert templates, (2) hybrid retrieval over curated maternal/newborn guidelines, and (3) evidence-conditioned generation from an LLM. Our core contribution is an evaluation workflow for high-stakes deployment under limited expert supervision. Targeting both component-level and end-to-end testing, we introduce: (i) a labeled triage benchmark (N=150) achieving 86.7% emergency recall, explicitly reporting the missed-emergency vs. over-escalation trade-off; (ii) a synthetic multi-evidence retrieval benchmark (N=100) with chunk-level evidence labels; (iii) LLM-as-judge comparison on real queries (N=781) using clinician-codesigned criteria; and (iv) expert validation. Our findings show that trustworthy medical assistants in multilingual, noisy settings require defense-in-depth design paired with multi-method evaluation, rather than any single model and evaluation method choice.

Smriti Jha, Vidhi Jain, Jianyu Xu +8

Carnegie Mellon University · Population Council Institute · Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research +1

HealthcareMedical LLMsClinical TriageClinical Language Model EvaluationRAG Evaluation
AskPDF
Mar 1, 2026

Prompt Sensitivity and Answer Consistency of Small Open-Source Language Models for Clinical Question Answering in Low-Resource Healthcare

Small open-source language models are gaining attention for healthcare applications in low-resource settings where cloud infrastructure and GPU hardware may be unavailable. However, the reliability of these models under different phrasings of the same clinical question remains poorly understood. We evaluate five open-source models (Gemma 2 2B, Phi-3 Mini 3.8B, Llama 3.2 3B, Mistral 7B, and Meditron-7B, a domain-pretrained model without instruction tuning) across three clinical question answering datasets (MedQA, MedMCQA, and PubMedQA) using five prompt styles: original, formal, simplified, roleplay, and direct. Model behavior is evaluated using consistency scores, accuracy, and instruction-following failure rates. All experiments were conducted locally on consumer CPU hardware without fine-tuning. Consistency and accuracy were largely independent across models. Gemma 2 achieved the highest consistency (0.845-0.888) but the lowest accuracy (33.0-43.5%), while Llama 3.2 showed moderate consistency (0.774-0.807) alongside the highest accuracy (49.0-65.0%). Roleplay prompts consistently reduced accuracy across all models, with Phi-3 Mini dropping 21.5 percentage points on MedQA. Meditron-7B exhibited near-complete instruction-following failure on PubMedQA (99.0% UNKNOWN rate), indicating that domain pretraining alone is insufficient for structured clinical question answering. These findings show that high consistency does not imply correctness: models can be reliably wrong, a dangerous failure mode in clinical AI. Llama 3.2 demonstrated the strongest balance of accuracy and reliability for low-resource deployment. Safe clinical AI requires joint evaluation of consistency, accuracy, and instruction adherence.

Shravani Hariprasad

Independent Researcher

Clinical Language Model EvaluationPrompt SensitivitySmall Language ModelsClinical QAReasoning Consistency in Language ModelsInstruction Following
AskPDF
Mar 20, 2026

Evaluating Large Language Models on Historical Health Crisis Knowledge in Resource-Limited Settings: A Hybrid Multi-Metric Study

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer significant potential for delivering health information. However, their reliability in low-resource contexts remains uncertain. This study evaluates GPT-4, Gemini Pro, Llama~3, and Mistral-7B on health crisis-related enquiries concerning COVID-19, dengue, the Nipah virus, and Chikungunya in the low-resource context of Bangladesh. We constructed a question--answer dataset from authoritative sources and assessed model outputs through semantic similarity, expert-model cross-evaluation, and Natural Language Inference (NLI). Findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in representing epidemiological history and health crisis knowledge, underscoring their promise and risks for informing policy in resource-constrained environments.

Mohammed Rakibul Hasan

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

LLM ReliabilityLLM EvaluationMedical LLMsFactual Knowledge in Language Models
AskPDF