WildfireSpreadBench: The Metric Decides the Model in Wildfire Spread Prediction

Every wildfire prediction model deployed today shares a dangerous property: none of these methods provides formal guarantees on how much fire spread is missed. Despite extensive work on wildfire spread prediction using deep learning, no prior study has applied distribution-free safety guarantees to this domain, leaving evacuation planners reliant on probability thresholds with no formal assurance. We address this gap by presenting, to our knowledge, the first application of conformal risk control (CRC) to wildfire spread prediction, providing finite-sample guarantees on false negative rate (FNR <= 0.05). We expose a stark failure: across three model families of increasing complexity (tabular: LightGBM, AUROC 0.854; convolutional: Tiny U-Net, AUROC 0.969; and graph-based: Hybrid ResGNN-UNet, AUROC 0.964), standard thresholds capture only 7-72% of true fire spread. CRC eliminates this failure uniformly. Our central finding is that model architecture determines evacuation efficiency, while CRC determines safety: both spatial models with CRC achieve approximately 95% fire coverage while flagging only approximately 15% of total pixels, making them 4.2x more efficient than LightGBM, while the graph model's additional complexity over a simple U-Net yields no meaningful efficiency gain. We propose a shift-aware three-way CRC framework that assigns SAFE/MONITOR/EVACUATE zones for operational triage, and characterize a fundamental limitation of prevalence-weighted bounds under extreme class imbalance (approximately 5% fire prevalence). All models, calibration code, and evaluation pipelines are released for reproducibility.

A growing body of literature has focused on predicting wildfire occurrence using machine learning methods, capitalizing on high-resolution data and fire predictors that canonical process-based frameworks largely ignore. Standard evaluation metrics for an ML classifier, while important, provide a potentially limited measure of the model's operational performance for the Fire Danger Index (FDI) forecast. Furthermore, model evaluation is frequently conducted without adequately accounting for false positive rates, despite their critical relevance in operational contexts. In this paper, we revisit the daily FDI model evaluation paradigm and propose a novel method for evaluating a forest fire forecasting model that is aligned with real-world decision-making. Furthermore, we systematically assess performance in accurately predicting fire activity and the false positives (false alarms). We further demonstrate that an ensemble of ML models improves both fire identification and reduces false positives.

Accurate next-day active fire forecasts can support early warning, disaster response, forest risk assessment, and downstream estimation of fire-related carbon emissions. Existing machine learning approaches to wildfire forecasting typically predict wildfire danger or fire probability on kilometre-scale daily grids, which is useful for regional warning but does not directly represent localized fire events. We propose Wildfire Ignition Set Predictor (WISP), a query-based model that reformulates next-day active fire forecasting as point-set prediction. From 48 hours of covariates including meteorology, satellite vegetation products, static land, and fire history, WISP predicts a fixed-size ranked set of future active fire cluster centres on a 375 m grid across globally distributed regions. The model is trained end-to-end with Hungarian matching; to address the conflicting roles of the classification score in assignment, ranking, and query activation, we use asymmetric classification-localization weighting in matching and loss. We further construct a globally distributed, hourly, multi-source benchmark for this task. On a held-out test set spanning fire regions worldwide, the best WISP variant achieves 38.2% average precision (AP) for ranked fire-centre detections, covers 53.4% of fire cluster mass weighted by fire radiative power (FRP), and localizes 54.1% of observed clusters within 5 km. These results establish sparse set prediction as a viable formulation for high-resolution wildfire forecasting and provide a benchmark for future work in this regime.