A Systematic Evaluation of Infrastructure-Based Radar System for Highway Traffic Monitoring

Radar-based navigation is appealing for its robustness to adverse conditions involving airborne particles, such as precipitation, dust, fog, and smoke, that can cause lidar-based systems to fail. Recently, direct methods that retain and use the entire radar scan rather than sparse points have improved on-road global localization performance. However, they have yet to be deployed in off-road environments or in closed-loop systems. Additionally, even direct global maps may lose information: their global nature leads to a smoothing out of viewpoint-dependent radar artifacts, which can provide pose information when mapping and localization occur along similar trajectories. This paper introduces Direct Radar Teach & Repeat (DRT&R): a direct spinning radar-based navigation stack that maximizes the amount of retained information by combining direct radar processing with local mapping. DRT&R yields state-of-the-art (SOTA) localization performance in both on-road and off-road environments. Using 344 km of on-road data and 20 km of off-road data, DRT&R is able to localize to within 4 cm in most on-road and off-road conditions, and 12 cm in geometrically degenerate and sparse environments. DRT&R is also evaluated autonomously in closed loop with an MPC controller for more than 10 km using a Clearpath Warthog off-road vehicle, demonstrating that it runs in real time and achieves SOTA tracking performance for off-road radar navigation.

Moving-object perception must decide which image regions correspond to real motion and keep every instance identified over time. Methods that read motion from appearance, optical flow, or estimated trajectories lose that evidence under poor illumination, adverse weather, reflections, and occlusion. Radar is a natural remedy because it measures radial velocity directly instead of inferring it from photometric correspondence. However, existing benchmarks do not jointly provide radar measurements, dense moving-instance masks, and temporally consistent identities for surveillance. We therefore introduce RGBTR-Motion, a synchronized and calibrated fixed-camera benchmark that pairs RGB, thermal, and radar streams with dense instance masks and temporally consistent identities across diverse surveillance scenes. We also develop SAM-Radar, an RGB, thermal, and radar-based segmentation and tracking framework built on SAM 3. SAM-Radar's radar-aware detector fuses calibrated RGBT features with radar returns that are grounded at their projected image locations, and motion supervision, implemented as foreground classification of those projected returns, teaches the detector to reject clutter without any text prompt. The tracker associates accepted radar returns with individual trajectories and uses them as physical evidence that a visually degraded target remains present. This allows it to bridge short periods of low visibility or occlusion and reconnect a reappearing target to its existing identity instead of starting a new track. SAM-Radar attains 0.7027 IoU and 0.8090 F1-50, and raises MOTA, HOTA, and IDF1 by 0.2977, 0.1603, and 0.2857 over the strongest competing values.

Traffic data collection is dominated today by deep object detectors followed by tracking-by-detection, a pipeline that presupposes what is often missing in practice: a detector already trained on the class one wants to count. We revisit a purely geometric traffic-sensing pipeline for Single Board Computers in which detection is class-agnostic: moving objects come from background subtraction and thresholding, and counting is decided by a geometric rule on an imaginary line across the road, a software inductive loop detector. With no object model, training set or per-object trajectory, it runs faster than real time on Raspberry Pi class hardware. Two counting rules are described: a constant average speed rule, whose expected accuracy is derived analytically as about 86% under a Gaussian speed distribution, and a self-calibrating pre-calibration rule that recovers the lane geometry from blob statistics and counts edges of lane occupancy, additionally yielding per-vehicle average speed at no extra cost. Over four videos the latter counts with 83.3%-100% accuracy; in a field deployment it reaches 91% against 37.5% for a blob-tracking baseline under the same compute budget. We report the observations of that period in detail: the resolution floor below which accuracy collapses, the frame rate floor at which vehicles alias past the counting line, the gap between short curated clips and long uncontrolled footage, and the trade-off between Python (easier to tune, 100% CPU) and C++ (40% CPU, thermally viable). These are properties of the sampling geometry, not of the hardware of the time, and still constrain edge deployments. We close by arguing where motion-based, class-agnostic detection remains the right tool: open-set classes with no annotated data, tight power budgets, privacy-constrained installations, and the cold start of mining training crops to bootstrap a learned detector.