Benchmarking Arabic--Russian Machine Translation: A Comparison of Fine-tuned NMT and Few-shot LLMs under Rich Morphology and Low Lexical Overlap

Russian and Arabic are among the major languages of scientific communication. Language barriers impede the exchange of research results between these communities, which affects international collaboration and the progress of sustainability-related research. We present a benchmark for Arabic--Russian scientific translation. The benchmark includes a hybrid parallel corpus of about 27,000 sentence pairs, compiled from scientific abstracts and general-domain texts (religion, news, conversations). We fine-tune three multilingual language models -- mT5-base (580M parameters), NLLB-200-distilled-1.3B (1.3B), and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (7B) -- using LoRA with ranks 8, 16, 32, and 64. The Qwen2.5-7B model with QLoRA (rank 8) yields BLEU 23.15, chrF 43.89, BERTScore 0.906, and COMET 0.758. These are +4.36 BLEU and +0.051 COMET above the zero-shot baseline. Few-shot prompting with three examples does not improve performance, indicating that domain-specific fine-tuning is required. We release the models, the corpus, and the evaluation code. By lowering the language barrier for scientific texts, the work enables knowledge exchange between Arabic-speaking and Russian-speaking researchers. It contributes to sustainable partnerships (UN SDG 17) and innovation infrastructure (SDG 9), aligning with the conference's focus on technology-driven sustainable development.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong performance in machine translation (MT). However, most prior work focuses on improving or benchmarking translation quality, offering limited insight into when and why LLM-based translation fails. In this work, we systematically analyze failure modes of LLMs in MT by evaluating 15 models, including four reasoning LLMs, across 22 language pairs (LPs) with varying resource levels. We find that non-English-centric LPs consistently yield lower COMET scores than English-centric pairs. To investigate the underlying causes, we introduce Token Activation Rate (TAR), a metric that captures how effectively a model utilizes language-specific tokens in its vocabulary during generation. We validate TAR as a proxy for language representation using models with known language distributions in the training data, and show that lower TAR is strongly associated with poorer translation performance. Furthermore, reasoning LLMs tend to generate more tokens when translating into low-TAR languages, suggesting a compensatory mechanism, although its impact on translation quality varies across models. Overall, our findings emphasize the importance of token-level dynamics in understanding MT performance of LLMs.

We present a systematic study of healthcare-domain cross-lingual transfer to address the scarcity of biomedical NMT resources for Arabic-script languages. We use Arabic and Persian as higher-resource pivots to improve translation for four severely low-resource targets: Dari (Afghan Persian, a standardised variety of Persian), Pashto, Sorani Kurdish (Central Kurdish, a major standardized variety of Kurdish), and Urdu (closely related to Hindi). Using LoRA fine-tuning on small decoder-only LLMs, we train domain-specific pivot adapters and evaluate three transfer strategies: few-shot in-context learning, minimal supervised adaptation, and, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time in this setting, zero-data LoRA adapter merging. Supervised adaptation with just 500 sentences achieves near pivot-language quality for Dari (CHrF++ 41.01) and meaningful gains for Urdu (28.88), while adapter merging reaches within 3.5 CHrF++ of supervised adaptation for Dari at zero additional cost. Pashto and Sorani Kurdish remain insufficient for high-stakes clinical deployment exposing the limits of cross-lingual transfer when structural distance from the pivots is too great. LoRA adapter merging works surprisingly well for closely related languages, even without target-language biomedical data.