FMCW LiDAR measures per-point radial Doppler velocity alongside range, providing a motion cue unavailable in conventional time-of-flight sensors. Exploiting this signal at long range remains understudied. We present an FMCW LiDAR dataset of 575 sequences (57.5K frames) with over 8 million annotated 3D boxes across 16 detection classes and per-point labels across 24 semantic classes, captured by six commercial FMCW LiDAR sensors and six paired 4K cameras across eight Bay Area cities, including 237 nighttime sequences, with annotations extending to 400m. We define a benchmark with three tasks: 3D object detection, scene flow estimation, and semantic segmentation. Detection and scene flow are evaluated across three range bins to 400m, with a public evaluation server. We explore the impact of Doppler measurements on flagship recognition tasks, and find significant improvements up to 2X in detection AP of far-away vehicles and pedestrians, particularly in low-latency single-frame settings. We similarly find scene flow accuracy is significantly improved with Doppler measurements across all ranges. Our dataset and benchmark have been publicly released at https://scenes.aeva.com.
Figures & tables
Fig. 2 : Key advantages of FMCW LiDAR.
Fig. 3 : FMCW LiDAR under challenging sensing conditions. Top: Direct sunlight. ( a ) Even under severe sun glare in the RGB image, ( b ) FMCW LiDAR still produces accurate range and velocity measurements, which ( c ) align well when overlaid. Bottom: Multi-LiDAR interference. ( d ) Here, the ego-vehicle is surrounded by other active LiDAR sensors (the Waymo vehicle). ( e ) FMCW LiDAR is immune to such interference and can still produce accurate range, velocity, and ( f ) reflectivity.
Scale
Sensor Setup
Coverage
Year
Dataset
Scenes
Frames
Boxes/Fr
Pts/Fr
Objects
LiDARs
Type
Cameras
Range
Night (#)
Classes
2012
KITTI
22
15K
13
120K
0.2M
1
ToF
4
91 m
×
8
2019
nuScenes
1000
40K
35
34K
1.4M
1
ToF
6
70 m
✓
23
2020
Waymo Open
1150
230K
55
177K
12.6M
5
ToF
5
80 m
102
4
2023
Argoverse V2
1000
150K
33
107K
5M
2
ToF
9
214 m
×
30
2023
HeLiPR
6
–
–
–
–
4
ToF+FMCW
–
200 m
✓
–
TABLE I : Comparison with existing autonomous driving datasets. Our FMCW LiDAR dataset is the first large-scale dataset captured entirely with FMCW LiDAR, offering the highest point density (508K pts/fr), greatest annotation density (140 boxes/fr), longest effective range (400 m), and the second largest number of night sequences (237) among all compared datasets.
Fig. 5 : Long-range annotation statistics of our FMCW LiDAR dataset. ( Top: ) distribution of 3D bounding boxes vs. distance from the ego vehicle; annotations extend up to 400 m (Waymo 80 m, nuScenes 141 m, Argoverse V2 214 m). ( Bottom: ) average LiDAR points per box vs. distance, remaining ∼ 13 points per box to 400 m.
Fig. 6 : Class distribution of our annotated FMCW LiDAR dataset.
Fig. 7 : Ego-motion compensation. ( Top: ) raw radial velocity measured by the LiDAR sensors moving on a highway towards the right. ( Bottom: ) after ego-motion compensation, static surfaces (e.g. ground) have zero velocity.
Fig. 8 : Sensor setup and coordinate system
Fig. 9 : Doppler improves single-frame and multi-frame long-range detection. We report AP ( ↑ ) by range for dynamic and all (static and dynamic) vehicles and pedestrians. At 200–400 m, adding Doppler to single-frame detectors consistently raises dynamic-vehicle AP from 0.33→0.67 (CenterPoint), 0.31→0.63 (DSVT), 0.39→0.68 (VoxelNeXt), and 0.50→0.72 (TransFusion). These velocity-aware single-frame detectors match or outperform their five-frame XYZ-only counterparts ( 0.52 , 0.62 , 0.56 , and 0.60 AP, respectively), using a 100 ms rather than 500 ms observation window. At the same range, all four single-frame XYZ-only models obtain 0.00 dynamic-pedestrian AP, while Doppler raises VoxelNeXt to 0.12 and TransFusion to 0.42 . With five frames, Doppler further raises all-pedestrian AP from 0.01→0.13 for CenterPoint and 0.13→0.33 for TransFusion, showing that instantaneous motion and accumulated geometry provide complementary cues.
Fig. 10 : Scene-flow EPE ( ↓ ) by input configuration and range. Adding radial velocity reduces EPE for every plotted method, range, and point subset. At 200–400 m, all-point EPE decreases from 9.47→5.02 cm for DeFlow, 17.87→5.44 cm for Flow4D, and 10.34→5.73 cm for SSF.
Table 10
Fig. 11 : Bird’s-eye-view visualization of FMCW LiDAR point cloud.
Range
Min pts
Max resid
Hits
Skip
Assoc dist
(m)
(cluster)
(m/s)
(mature)
(max)
(m)
0–50
8
5.0
3
5
8
50–100
3
5.0
2
5
8
100–200
3
8.0
2
5
12
200–300
3
8.0
2
5
15
300–400
4
6.0
3
3
15
TABLE IV : Range-tier overrides. Tiers are checked in order; the first tier whose max range covers the object is used.
Table 13
Vehicle
Pedestrian
AP
SpdE (m/s)
AP
SpdE (m/s)
Method
Input
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
Classical
1-frame
0.61
0.59
0.41
0.58
0.84
0.98
1.64
0.98
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
CenterPoint
1-frame
0.64
0.65
0.33
0.62
8.99
10.54
12.99
9.91
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.03
1.27
2.32
–
1.32
+vel
0.79
0.81
0.67
0.80
3.99
3.28
3.41
3.68
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.99
0.54
–
0.94
5-frame
0.79
0.75
0.52
0.75
1.65
1.88
3.37
1.92
0.36
0.22
0.04
0.35
0.28
0.32
2.12
0.28
TABLE VI : Dynamic object detection. Best AP ( ↑ ) and SpdE ( ↓ ) values are bold within each frame setting; one-frame configurations are green and five-frame configurations are orange.
Vehicle
Pedestrian
AP
SpdE (m/s)
AP
SpdE (m/s)
Method
Input
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
0–100 m
100–200 m
200–400 m
Full Range
Classical
1-frame
0.23
0.39
0.33
0.27
0.90
1.07
2.61
1.15
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
CenterPoint
1-frame
0.77
0.60
0.34
0.71
3.86
8.89
12.41
5.35
0.53
0.12
0.00
0.50
0.73
0.99
–
0.74
+vel
0.76
0.68
0.58
0.74
1.77
2.85
4.34
2.18
0.65
0.37
0.01
0.63
0.76
0.99
–
0.77
5-frame
0.79
0.63
0.39
0.74
0.78
1.60
3.81
1.15
0.75
0.46
0.01
0.72
0.41
0.56
2.73
0.42
TABLE VII : All-object detection (static + dynamic). Best AP ( ↑ ) and SpdE ( ↓ ) values are bold within each frame setting; one-frame configurations are green and five-frame configurations are orange.
We present 4DLidarOpen, a large-scale open multi-modal dataset for autonomous driving, centered on 4D frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) Lidar sensing. Unlike conventional time-of-flight Lidar datasets that mainly provide geometric measurements, 4DLidarOpen includes point-wise radial velocity measurements from a forward-facing 4D FMCW Lidar, together with multiple Lidars of different types, including rotating, solid-state, and blind-spot variants, surround-view cameras, and 6-DOF ego-vehicle poses. The dataset was collected in complex urban environments in Beijing and covers dense pedestrian interactions, congested traffic, high-speed driving, and unprotected maneuvers. 4DLidarOpen provides synchronized multi-sensor data and 3D bounding-box annotations with persistent track IDs across five object categories. A hybrid annotation strategy is adopted, where large-scale auto-labeled data support scalable training and human experts refine annotations for the human-annotated training and validation sets. Based on this dataset, we establish benchmarks for 3D object detection, birds-eye view (BEV) segmentation and flow prediction, and motion forecasting with planning. Extensive experiments show that direct velocity measurements from 4D FMCW Lidar provide complementary motion cues for dynamic-scene understanding. Compared with geometric-only sensing, the velocity-aware representation improves motion-related perception and downstream forecasting and planning, especially in scenarios involving vulnerable road users and fast-moving objects. These results indicate that 4D FMCW Lidar is a promising sensing modality for motion-aware autonomous driving. The dataset and evaluation toolkit are publicly released to support research on 4D scene understanding, multi-Lidar fusion, and velocity-aware perception and planning.
Conventional LiDAR-inertial odometry (LIO) or simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) methods heavily rely on geometric features of environments, as LiDARs primarily provide range measurements instead of motion measurements. From now on, however, the situation changes thanks to the novel Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Doppler LiDARs. FMCW Doppler LiDARs not only offer the point range with high resolution but also capture the instant point Doppler velocity through the Doppler effect. In the letter, we propose FMCW-LIO, a novel and robust LIO, leveraging intrinsic Doppler measurements from FMCW Doppler LiDARs. To correctly exploit Doppler velocities, a motion compensation method is designed, and a Doppler-aided observation model is applied for on-manifold state estimation. Then, dynamic points can be effectively removed by the Doppler criteria, deriving more consistent geometric observations. FMCW-LIO eventually achieves accurate state estimation and static mapping, even in structure-degenerated environments. Extensive experiments in diverse scenes are performed and FMCW-LIO outperforms other algorithms on both accuracy and robustness.
LiDAR scene flow is the task of estimating per-point 3D motion between consecutive point clouds. Recent methods achieve centimeter-level accuracy on popular autonomous vehicle (AV) datasets, but are typically only trained and evaluated on a single sensor. In this paper, we aim to learn general motion priors that transfer to diverse and unseen LiDAR sensors. However, prior work in LiDAR semantic segmentation and 3D object detection demonstrate that naively training on multiple datasets yields worse performance than single dataset models. Interestingly, we find that this conventional wisdom does not hold for motion estimation, and that state-of-the-art scene flow methods greatly benefit from cross-dataset training without architectural modification. We posit that low-level tasks such as motion estimation may be less sensitive to sensor configuration; indeed, our analysis shows that models trained on fast-moving objects (e.g., from highway datasets) perform well on fast-moving objects, even across different datasets. Informed by our analysis, we propose UniFlow, a feedforward model that unifies and trains on multiple large-scale LiDAR scene flow datasets with diverse sensor placements and point cloud densities. Our frustratingly simple solution establishes a new state-of-the-art on Waymo and nuScenes, improving over prior work by 5.1% and 35.2% respectively. Moreover, UniFlow achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on unseen datasets like TruckScenes and AEVAScenes, outperforming prior dataset-specific models by 30.1% and 22.5% respectively.
Siyi Li, Qingwen Zhang, Ishan Khatri +4
University of Pennsylvania · KTH Royal Institute of Technology · StackAV +1