cs.CVSep 28, 2026

One Sensor, Whole Body - 3D Body Pose from a Single Consumer Earbud IMU

Authors: Zhilin Guo, Boqiao Zhang, Oszkár Urbán, Josef Bengtson, Hakan Aktas, Wenzhao Li, Siyu Hong, Kyle Fogarty, +3 more

Organizations: University of Cambridge United Kingdom · Chalmers University of Technology Sweden

Abstract

Consumer earbuds already stream inertial motion data from the head, one of the most widely worn sensor locations on the body. We ask how much of the 3D body pose a single such head IMU can recover, and whether adding more consumer sensors actually helps. We build a multimodal capture pipeline that records four-view RGB-D video together with an AirPods head IMU and two Striv insole IMUs, synchronize the streams post-hoc, and generate pseudo-ground-truth with SAM 3D Body, yielding a 35-take single-subject benchmark spanning gait, turning, vertical, everyday, and clinically inspired motions. Adapting two recurrent model families (IMUPoser and MobilePoser), we show that one head IMU recovers lower-body pose at 79.0 mm rigid-MPJPE and per-foot ground contact at 0.809 macro-F1, and that a causal variant retains most of this accuracy at streaming latency. In paired per-take significance tests across both families, adding the consumer foot IMUs never significantly improves pose and significantly degrades it in two of four model-split combinations; a mounting-bias probe and feet-only ablation identify insole orientation quality, not foot placement, as the mechanism. Extending the output to a 20-joint full-body skeleton maps the boundary: gross distal-arm motion is partially recoverable from the head alone, proximal upper-body pose is not, and staged fine-tuning recovers the leg accuracy that naive joint training sacrifices to multi-task dilution. For learned pose from consumer wearables, sensor reliability, not sensor count, is the binding constraint here. For the devices tested, the earbud is its sweet spot. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhilinGuo/one-sensor-whole-body.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 28, 2026cs.CV

Reliability-Gated Fusion of Consumer Head and Foot IMUs for Lower-Body 3D Pose

Sparse inertial pose estimation promises camera-free motion capture from consumer devices, but consumer sensors are unreliable: firmware-fused orientations are biased, mounting varies between sessions, and streams drift or drop out. On a new 35-take single-subject benchmark pairing an earbud head inertial measurement unit (IMU) with two smart-insole foot IMUs (SAM-3D-Body pseudo-ground-truth labels), we show the reliability problem is channel-level: a channel ablation isolates foot acceleration as the most informative input (66.6 mm vs. 79.0 mm head-only) and the firmware-fused foot orientation as the liability that destroys the gain. We therefore let the model learn how much to trust each channel of each stream: one temporal gate per stream per channel block, trained with an auxiliary reliability objective on synthetically corrupted pretraining data. The channel-gated model is the most accurate of our learned fusion arms on clean data (69.4 mm vs. 83.7 static, 86.6 ungated) and under every simulated fault (bias in training; drift, dropout eval-only); its gates suppress the natively biased foot-orientation channels on clean real data without test-time supervision and flag dropout bursts at 0.92-0.999 AUROC. Two contrasts: dropping a channel known a priori to fail is flat across foot faults but collapses when an unanticipated stream fails (head dropout: 92.9 vs. 79.3 mm); and a fine-tuned HMD-Poser is more accurate on clean data (64.4 mm) and nominally under drift, with no significant paired difference under bias or dropout, but a larger worst-case degradation from clean (+16.1 vs. +3.5 mm, single seed). Learning to gate reliability instead of sensor count is the lever for deployable sparse inertial capture. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhilinGuo/reliability-gated-imu-fusion.
Jul 8, 2026cs.CV

Towards Real-World Wearable Motion Reconstruction

The modern-day surge in popularity of wearable devices poses a fundamentally unique motion capture problem: reconstructing full-body movement from any set of sensing hardware worn at a given moment. Yet, most research efforts assume fixed sensor configurations (e.g. IMU suits or HMD-centric rigs) and cannot generalize across them. In contrast, we argue that motion capture should prioritize unobtrusive and lightweight devices such as smartphones, smartwatches, smart glasses, and smart insoles, and study the interplay between them. To this end, we make three contributions. First, we present a large-scale multi-modal dataset synchronizing these consumer-grade sensors with ground-truth 3D motion, spanning 50 diverse activities including everyday tasks, sports, and social interactions. Second, we propose WHIP, a baseline generative model that reconstructs motion from arbitrary subsets of available sensors, robustly handling missing modalities and producing physically plausible motions. Third, we conduct a systematic study of sensor complementarity, quantifying how different modalities complement one another. Code and dataset are available at https://vcai.mpi-inf.mpg.de/projects/WHIP/
Sep 8, 2026cs.CV

ArmPoser: Real-Time, Calibration-Free Arm Pose Estimation from Smartwatch IMU

Arm pose estimation enables applications in fitness, extended reality input, rehabilitation, and life logging. Prior smartwatch-based approaches rely on calibration poses and preprocessing pipelines that transform raw IMU measurements into standardized training formats. These steps hinder deployment in everyday settings and introduce errors due to imperfect calibration and sensor drift. We present ArmPoser, a calibration-free arm pose estimation system using a single smartwatch IMU. Our central contribution is training models directly in the reference frame native to consumer smartwatches, aligning learning with how IMU data is produced by deployed devices. By operating on device-native axes, ArmPoser removes the need for coordinate transformations, explicit alignment, and bone-offset calibration used in prior work. We further augment training with physically grounded variations in watch placement and arm morphology to account for user-specific variability. ArmPoser also includes a wear-configuration module that infers anterior or posterior forearm placement and crown orientation. We evaluate pose estimation on public benchmarks and on a 10-participant, 30-activity study using watchOS and Android smartwatches, where ArmPoser matches or exceeds calibrated baselines without any user calibration.