BatSLAM 2.0: Sequence-Verified Sonar Place Recognition in a Robust Pose Graph

Autonomous underwater navigation typically relies on complex and expensive multi-modal sensor suites designed to prioritize global Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) accuracy. However, local reactive behaviors such as coarse navigation and obstacle avoidance require only local consistency---a capability that should be feasible using only a Forward-Looking Sonar (FLS), yet remains largely unaddressed, leaving a critical gap in FLS-only local SLAM. Moreover, existing acoustic SLAM frameworks predominantly rely on sparse feature extraction methods that discard substantial portions of the already information-sparse acoustic returns. To overcome these limitations, this work introduces a dense direct registration approach that aligns full acoustic intensity scans to a recursively updated local map. Real-time execution is achieved via an Inverse Compositional Gauss-Newton optimization strategy that minimizes computational overhead. Experimental evaluations show that this dense method yields significant improvements on translation error compared to sparse keypoint baselines, maintaining stable sub-meter tracking precision over wide displacement gaps. Moreover, this approach delivers odometry performance comparable to multi-sensor fusion pipelines (FLS, DVL, and IMU), bypassing expensive payload dependencies in feature-rich environments. We validate real-world applicability through AUV field trials, running the full local SLAM approach onboard an embedded, resource-constrained computer.

Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is one of the fundamental problems in robotics, as it enables autonomous operations in real-world scenarios. Under low illumination, reduced contrast, sensor noise, and motion blur degrade both feature extraction and feature matching, while compensating with LiDAR, depth, or thermal sensors raises cost, power draw, and integration complexity. Existing benchmarks remain dominated by well-lit indoor or daylight sequences, leaving open how far SLAM with standard RGB cameras can be pushed in the dark. We benchmark six systems spanning the feature-based, direct, filter-based, and learning-based paradigms - ORB-SLAM3, DSO, Kimera-VIO, OpenVINS, DPVO, and DPV-SLAM - on five LaMARia sequences of varying difficulty and illumination, reporting absolute and relative pose error alongside control-point recall. Kimera-VIO is the only system to track all five sequences to completion, combining the lowest relative pose error with steadily growing absolute error due to the absence of loop closure; DPVO and DPV-SLAM never lose tracking but incur absolute errors of roughly 100 m under low light; and the classical monocular pipelines (ORB-SLAM3, DSO) together with the filter-based OpenVINS fail outright or diverge on most of the harder and low-light sequences. The results suggest that RGB-only SLAM maintains stable low-light tracking only when both inertial fusion and global optimization are present. Closing the remaining gap will likely require low-light-specific learned front-ends or a return to complementary sensing.

Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is one of the services running on an autonomous robot. It is typically run to assist other tasks such as planning, manipulation, etc. All these tasks are run on edge hardware and are subject to severe resource constraints. However, most SLAM systems are built and tested in isolation, and their performance is reported as if they are the only task running on a system. We observe that existing benchmarks lack a common mechanism for comparing SLAM systems under realistic resource constraints. To address this limitation, we have developed SLAMSqueezeBench, a framework that allows testing of SLAM systems under realistic workloads on edge hardware. It does so by imposing constraints on compute and memory resources available for the SLAM system during execution. It also simulates realistic camera frame acquisition with frame drops when a finite buffer is full. Using SLAMSqueezeBench, we compare nine SLAM systems spanning classical systems, learning-based systems, and approaches for Gaussian splatting. Our testing framework will be available for use by the community upon publication.