cs.AISep 30, 2026

Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based Systems

Authors: Yizhi Liu, Balaji Padmanabhan, Siva Viswanathan

Organizations: Fox School of Business, Temple University · Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland

Abstract

Before a difficult decision, people often act simply to understand the situation better. We turn an object to see another side, place alternatives next to each other, or change one condition and observe what happens. These actions may not complete the task, but they improve the evidence needed for the next choice. LLM-based agents can search and explore, yet agent design gives less attention to an earlier question: is the available evidence ready for the decision? Sometimes necessary evidence is missing. In other cases, the evidence is present but its form hides what matters, or the comparison needed to judge it does not yet exist. Cognitive science calls actions that improve the basis for a later choice epistemic actions. We bring this idea to LLM-based agents and distinguish three modes: acquiring missing evidence, transforming available evidence, and probing a system to create a revealing response. We use the term epistemic scaffolding for the interfaces, tools, and environments that make these actions possible and auditable. This paper argues that agent design must address how decision-ready evidence is produced.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. AI scientists produce results without reasoning scientifically

    Apr 20, 2026Martiño Ríos-García, Nawaf Alampara, Chandan Gupta +5Artificial Intelligence ScientistsLLM Reasoning Strategies

  2. ForeSci: Evaluating LLM Agents for Forward-Looking AI Research Judgment

    May 30, 2026Qiuyu Tian, Haojie Yin, Yingce Xia +2Large Language Model AgentsForesight

  3. Agents Explore but Agents Ignore: LLMs Lack Environmental Curiosity

    Apr 19, 2026Leon Engländer, Sophia Althammer, Ahmet Üstün +2Agentic ControlEnvironment