OmniAct3D: Leveraging Foundation Geometry and Evidence-Grounded Reasoning for Panoramic 3D Detection
Authors: Runtong Wu, Fei Teng, Di Wen, Guoqiang Zhao, Kunyu Peng, Kailun Yang
Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics and the National Engineering Research Center of Robot Visual Perception and Control Technology, Hunan University, China · Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Accurate 3D detection is essential for mobile embodied agents, while Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) offer transferable visual and geometric priors. Yet existing VFM-based 3D detectors rely on narrow-view monocular images or discrete perspective views, limiting coherent surround perception; equirectangular projection (ERP) instead encodes a continuous 360 scene in a single image. Direct transfer remains difficult because ERP organizes geometry and visual information differently, making object-relevant cues hard to model, localize, and preserve. We propose OmniAct3D, a framework that adapts perspective-trained VFM detectors to ERP while preserving transferable VFM priors. To resolve geometric mismatch, the ERP-Ray Geometry Adapter (ERGA-Ray) models spherical viewing rays and periodic spatial structure. To localize evidence in scene-wide context, the Visual-Action Reasoning Chain (VARC) grounds each hypothesis in relevant panoramic evidence and converts it into a structured geometric action. To recover local cues lost under fixed token budgets, the Appearance-Guided Heading Expert (AGHE) re-encodes object regions at higher resolution for heading estimation. Experiments show that OmniAct3D improves over the previous best 3D detector by 2.96 NDS points on Spheriverse and over the unadapted VFM baseline by 24.87 mAP points on PanoMMOcc. With target-specific geometry adaptation, VARC retains 95--98% of the same-configuration mAP, indicating reusable object-level 3D reasoning across sensing configurations. The source code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/FeiT-FeiTeng/OmniAct3D.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Comparison of monocular, multi-view, and ERP 3D detection paradigms. Monocular methods observe a limited field of view [ 3 ] , while multi-view methods rely on discrete perspective observations [ 4 ] . In contrast, our method enables coherent 360∘ perception from a single ERP image.
Fig. 2: Overview of the feature flow in OmniAct3D . The frozen VFM-based detector extracts visual features Fvis and pretrained geometry memory M0 from the ERP image. ERGA-Ray transforms M0 into the ERP-adapted memory M , after which the detector produces B , Q , and C . VARC retrieves evidence V and predicts an action A to obtain B′ , while the AGHE updates its directed heading to produce the final prediction B^ .
Fig. 3: Qualitative 3D detection comparisons on Spheriverse [ 12 ] (top) and PanoMMOcc [ 13 ] (bottom). Columns show the Ground Truth (GT), OmniAct3D without VARC (W.V), full OmniAct3D (Ours), and representative baselines.
Fig. 4: Cumulative mAP and NDS are reported for Spheriverse [ 12 ] (a–d) and PanoMMOcc [ 13 ] (e–h) across planar-range thresholds (a,b,e,f) and overlap levels (c,d,g,h). Blue curves denote the ERGA-Ray+AGHE variant without VARC, whereas red curves denote full OmniAct3D.
Method
Backbone
Spheriverse mAP / NDS
PanoMMOcc mAP / NDS
No Adapt.
LingBot [ 46 ]
0.0301 / 0.0335
0.3410 / 0.2330
MLP
LingBot [ 46 ]
0.0980 / 0.1066
0.3730 / 0.2575
AdaptFormer [ 55 ]
LingBot [ 46 ]
0.0959 / 0.1060
0.3585 / 0.2458
Circular Conv [ 56 ]
LingBot [ 46 ]
0.0975 / 0.1071
0.3692 / 0.2522
Ray-FiLM [ 57 ]
LingBot [ 46 ]
0.0929 / 0.1051
0.3689 / 0.2534
PanoSwin-based [ 28 ]
LingBot [ 46 ]
0.0948 / 0.1056
0.3690 / 0.2552
TABLE III: Geometry adaptation and backbone comparisons.
Spheriverse
PanoMMOcc
Variant
mAP ↑
NDS ↑
mAP ↑
NDS ↑
Diag. mAP ↑
Fixed Evidence
0.1199
0.1274
0.5892
0.4034
0.1257
Unstruct. Action
0.1180
0.1266
0.5890
0.4037
0.1400
BBox State Only
0.1194
0.1271
0.5889
0.4015
0.1311
Full VARC
0.1887
0.1825
0.5897
0.4032
0.1768
TABLE V: VARC component ablation.
Dataset
Center Gain ↑
Δ S@2m ↑
Δ S@4m ↑
Positive-change Prec. ↑
Spheriverse
0.8019 m
+3.79%
+12.30%
86.79%
PanoMMOcc
0.5430 m
+13.97%
+7.94%
87.88%
TABLE VI: VARC gains on evidence-challenging targets.