Scenario-Based Compositional Statistical Model Checking for Safety Specifications

The rapid advancement of autonomous driving (AD) technologies has outpaced the development of robust safety evaluation methods. Conventional testing relies on exposing AD systems to vast numbers of real-world traffic scenes -- a brute-force approach that is prohibitively expensive and statistically ineffective at capturing the rare, safety-critical edge cases essential for validating real-world robustness. To address this fundamental limitation, we introduce STRELGen, a scalable framework for the targeted generation of safety-critical driving scenarios. STRELGen synergistically combines a multi-agent trajectory-generation diffusion model (DM) with Spatio-Temporal Logic (STREL) specifications that encode complex safety and realism properties through a highly interpretable formalism. Crucially, monitoring satisfaction levels of these specifications is differentiable, enabling gradient-based search. At inference time, we optimize directly over the DM latent space to maximize STREL formula satisfaction. The result is efficient generation of highly plausible yet safety-critical multi-agent scenarios that lie within the learned data distribution. STRELGen thus provides a flexible, interpretable, and powerful tool for stress-testing autonomous driving systems, moving beyond the limitations of brute-force data collection.

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) require extensive testing in simulation, but test case generation for driving scenarios is laborious. The desired scenarios are often out-of-distribution and have precise requirements on interactions with the AV policy under test. Manually programming scenarios allows for precise controllability but is difficult to scale. On the other hand, statistical models can leverage compute and data, but struggle with precise controllability when out-of-distribution. We cast scenario orchestration as a constraint-solving problem and present a language-in, simulation-out scenario orchestrator for closed-loop testing AVs. Our approach leverages foundation model reasoning to translate general, natural language descriptions into a set of constraints as a scenario representation. This then allows us to leverage off the shelf solvers to solve for actor behaviors which meet precise testing intentions in closed-loop. Under a benchmark of carefully crafted and diverse scenario descriptions, our approach greatly outperforms our baselines in orchestration success rate. We further show that our closed-loop approach is especially important for scenarios which require ego-reactive specifications.

Motion planning for autonomous driving must account for multi-modal uncertainty in both the intentions and trajectories of surrounding vehicles. Handling uncertainty in a worst-case manner guarantees robustness but often leads to excessive conservatism. Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC) reduces trajectory-level conservatism through chance constraints, yet remains conservative with respect to intention uncertainty since constraints must hold across all intentions. We present a novel combination of SMPC and the branching structure, enabling the planner to generate distinct trajectories for different possible intentions while maintaining safety under trajectory uncertainty. A novel scenario clustering is proposed to merge prediction scenarios based on high-level decision similarity, thereby ensuring real-time tractability. Furthermore, an adaptive branching-time computation postpones commitment to separate plans until intention uncertainty is sufficiently reduced. Simulation studies in challenging highway scenarios demonstrate that the proposed method improves safety, reduces conservatism, and achieves real-time computational performance.