Emergency messaging such as extreme-weather reports and earthquake instructions can involve high stakes, to the extent that translation errors can lead to tragic consequences. The use of machine translation or generative artificial intelligence might therefore not be recommended. On the other hand, time savings in the initial translation can allow greater investments of resources in revision and authorization processes, as well as a wider range of target languages. An experiment with generative AI translations of an earthquake instruction text from English into Chinese and Spanish shows that use of discourse-specific prompts can considerably improve understandability and actionability, although the translations may still not be trusted by translators. Human revision is still required, not only to detect errors but also because of the ethical need for someone to take responsibility for any errors or delays in such messaging.
This paper offers a call to action. We urge our colleagues in the research community to play a greater role in the articulation of our findings to the public. To illustrate the stakes we present a case study on the initial stages of an LLM-based machine translation application's deployment in a real-world context: a text-2-911 system advertising capabilities in 55 languages for use in emergencies in which it may be difficult to call operators directly. We identify a number of common misconceptions about technologies such as these, concluding with a set of concrete recommendations and best practices for stakeholders at every stage of the development and deployment pipeline. While the advancement of scientific research often lies in solving the "hard" problems, we argue it is often the "easy" ones -- problems for which the latest technology is often unnecessary -- that are most overlooked.
Sara Court, Lara Downing, Micha Elsner
The Ohio State University · Community Refugee & Immigration Services (CRIS)
We investigate whether large language models produce different medical triage recommendations for identical symptoms based solely on the language of the patient prompt. Using Gemini 3.5 Flash, we evaluate a neurological symptom profile (persistent headache, blurred vision, nausea) across six languages (English, Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Arabic) with 30 runs per condition (n=450 total API calls). We find that the model recommends emergency room visits at rates ranging from 0% (Japanese, Hindi) to 30% (English, Arabic), despite assigning nearly identical severity scores (7.7-8.0/10) across all languages. Adding a single sentence specifying the patient's US location increases ER recommendations by up to 76.7 percentage points for non-English prompts, while the reverse anchor (English prompt with a Tokyo location) reduces the ER rate from 30% to 6.7%. A back-translation control (Japanese to English) produces ER rates comparable to the English baseline, confirming that the disparity is not caused by translation quality but by implicit geographic inference from the input language. We release the complete dataset, experiment code, and results.
We present Agentic AI Translate, an agentic translator prototype that operationalises the thesis of Yamada (forthcoming) -- that the metalanguage of Translation Studies has become an instruction code for generative AI. The system replaces the dominant text-in / text-out paradigm of machine translation with a four-stage agentic cycle (Identify -> Prompt -> Generate -> Verify), preceded by an interactive specification phase in which the user composes -- through model-assisted dialogue -- a structured translation brief grounded in skopos theory, register, audience, and genre conventions. The verification stage adopts the GEMBA-MQM error-span protocol (Kocmi & Federmann, 2023) for evidence-grounded scoring, and document-level coherence is preserved through a DelTA-lite memory of proper nouns and a running bilingual summary, after Wang et al. (2025). We describe the philosophical motivation, the architectural commitments, the four reference-material categories the system consumes, and the principal design tensions the architecture makes explicit. Empirical validation is left for future work; the contribution here is conceptual and architectural -- an executable embodiment of the position that translation in the GenAI era is communication design, not text conversion.