Consumers often describe what they need rather than use the terminology found on a banking website. For example, a natural-language request ("a card for travel") may not share the keywords of the relevant product page, and the problem is harder in bilingual services, where the same intent may be expressed in Arabic or English. This paper presents an evidence-gated bilingual retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for consumer banking search that operates entirely on local infrastructure. The framework combines structured web-content refinement, hybrid dense-lexical retrieval, intent-aware evidence selection, cross-encoder reranking, and a three-outcome Answer / Related Mismatch / No Answer decision mechanism. On 210 URL-labeled Arabic and English queries, the proposed approach improves Top-1 hit rate from 50.48% to 79.05% and MRR@5 from 0.571 to 0.797 over a hybrid baseline. A separate 26-case end-to-end evaluation achieved 69.2% strict success, with 72.7% of generated answers classified as supported by an automated faithfulness judge. These results are preliminary: the retrieval queries are paraphrases of a small reference set, and the end-to-end test is small and uses an automated rather than human judge, so they do not establish human-verified answer correctness or generalizable performance.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Sources of retrieval-irrelevant content in raw consumer banking webpages prior to retrieval-oriented content refinement.
Fig. 2: Architecture of the proposed evidence-gated bilingual RAG framework. The offline pipeline builds a structured bilingual evidence base; the online pipeline resolves each query to one of three outcomes: Answer, Related Mismatch (a classification label, not a second retrieval), or No Answer. Grounded generation and faithfulness checking are evaluated in a separate, preliminary 26-case end-to-end experiment reported in Section V-C ; they are not evaluated in the 220-query retrieval experiment. All components run on local infrastructure.
Fig. 3: Transformation of raw banking web content into structured, retrieval-ready evidence through the data refinery pipeline.
Metric
Hybrid
Proposed
Improvement
Top-1 (%)
50.48
79.05
+28.57
Top-3 (%)
62.38
79.52
+17.14
Hit@5 (%)
70.00
81.43
+11.43
MRR@5
0.5708
0.7974
+0.2266
nDCG@5
0.5950
0.7975
+0.2025
TABLE I: Retrieval Performance on 210 URL-Labeled Queries
Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (mRAG) leverages cross-lingual evidence to ground Large Language Models (LLMs) in global knowledge. However, we show that current mRAG systems suffer from a language bias during reranking, systematically favoring English and the query's native language. By introducing an estimated oracle evidence analysis, we quantify a substantial performance gap between existing rerankers and the achievable upper bound. Further analysis reveals a critical distributional mismatch: while optimal predictions require evidence scattered across multiple languages, current systems systematically suppress such ``answer-critical'' documents, thereby limiting downstream generation performance. To bridge this gap, we propose Language-Agnostic Utility-driven Reranker Alignment (LAURA), which aligns multilingual evidence ranking with downstream generative utility. Experiments across diverse languages and generation models show that LAURA effectively mitigates language bias and consistently improves mRAG performance.
Dan Wang, Guozhao Mo, Yafei Shi +9
Chinese Information Processing Laboratory, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · MYbank, AntGroup
Multilingual retrieval-augmented generation (mRAG) is often implemented within a fixed retrieval space, typically via query or document translation or multilingual embedding vector representations. However, this approach may be inadequate for culturally grounded queries, in which retrieval-condition misalignment may occur. Even strong retrievers and generators may struggle to produce culturally relevant answers when sourcing evidence from inappropriate linguistic or regional contexts. To this end, we introduce CORAL (COntext-aware Retrieval with Agentic Loop, an adaptive retrieval methodology for mRAG that enables iterative refinement of both the retrieval space (corpora) and the retrieval probe (query) based on the quality of the evidence. The overall process includes: (1) selecting corpora, (2) retrieving documents, (3) critiquing evidence for relevance and cultural alignment, and (4) checking sufficiency. If the retrieved documents are insufficient to answer the query correctly, the system (5) reselects corpora and rewrites the query. Across two cultural QA benchmarks, CORAL achieves up to a 3.58%p accuracy improvement on low-resource languages relative to the strongest baselines.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the standard way to ground large language models in external knowledge, yet most systems retrieve a fixed number of passages for every question regardless of its difficulty. This wastes computation on easy questions, starves hard ones, and gives no signal for when a generated answer can be trusted. With a growing share of question answering systems built on top of commercial language model APIs, a method that can decide how much to retrieve, and how far to trust its own answers, without retraining the underlying model, is of clear practical value. This paper presents AB-RAG (Adaptive Budgeted Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a training-free and backbone-agnostic framework that generates an answer, estimates its confidence from a combination of three signals, and then decides whether to stop or to retrieve more evidence, subject to a fixed retrieval budget. The estimator combines the model's own certainty, the agreement between the answer and the evidence, and the variance of the retrieval scores. For models that expose token probabilities the certainty signal is read directly; for closed APIs it is approximated by self-consistency, so the method works without access to model internals. Across three backbones and two datasets, the central result is that the confidence estimate reliably separates correct from incorrect answers on every backbone, reaching a clean split of 57.6% against 0% Exact Match between high- and low-confidence answers on a factoid dataset. The adaptive policy improves accuracy on capable backbones, and the study reports its negative and nuanced findings honestly, including a confidence signal that proved unsuitable for short answers and a retrieval signal whose sign was found and corrected through measurement. The entire study was carried out on a single consumer laptop with only a few dollars of API spend.
Ansh Kamthan
Department of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Manipal University Jaipur Jaipur, India