Intent-Informed Model Predictive Control for Shared Autonomy in Remote Manipulation Tasks

We aim to address the challenge of teleoperating robotic arms for high-degree-of-freedom (high-DoF) manipulation tasks, which is cognitively demanding and error-prone, particularly when relying on low-bandwidth interfaces. We propose Robot Trajectron V3 (RT-V3), a probabilistic shared control framework designed for $SE(3)$ grasping tasks. RT-V3 formulates shared control as Bayesian inference by learning a prior over user intent and combining it with real-time user commands to estimate the posterior intent distribution. The prior models user intent as a distribution over future trajectories conditioned on past robot dynamics and visual scene context. The intent prior is parameterized by a transformer-based conditional generative model that reasons over point clouds and candidate grasp poses, together with a factorized translation-rotation representation that improves learning efficiency in high-dimensional action spaces. During execution, RT-V3 continuously estimates the posterior distribution over future trajectories by combining the learned intent prior with a user-command likelihood derived from the observed control input, enabling continuous intent refinement and shared assistance. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that RT-V3 achieves high accuracy in trajectory prediction and competitive performance in reactive planning. Furthermore, real-world user studies indicate that RT-V3 significantly outperforms baseline methods in terms of success rate and efficiency, while substantially reducing the user's physical and mental workload.

Shared control often allocates robot authority based on confidence in inferred human intent, assuming reliable autonomous execution. When this assumption fails, high intent confidence can cause over-helping. We present a capability-aware shared-control framework in which a vision-language model (VLM) infers human intent and provides semantic-intent confidence, while a vision-language-action (VLA) policy generates autonomous actions. VLA capability confidence is estimated online from the dispersion and local instability of stochastic action trajectories. We design a nonlinear arbitration policy that combines Bayesian-filtered semantic-intent confidence with VLA capability confidence through a sigmoid mapping to adapt robot authority. Our evaluation combined VLM/VLA confidence assessment with a study involving 12 participants performing pick-and-place and bidirectional stacking under in-distribution and out-of-distribution conditions. The proposed method achieved the highest task success rate (92%), compared with manual teleoperation (83%), intent-only arbitration (44%), and fixed equal-weight blending (10%). It also achieved higher control friendliness and lower authority-weighted disagreement than both shared-control baselines. These results demonstrate the benefit of incorporating VLA capability into authority allocation to mitigate over-helping and improve shared-control performance.

Shared autonomy systems combine user input with autonomous assistance to help users with motor impairments control robot arms to perform everyday manipulation tasks, by inferring user goals and providing appropriate guidance. However, the robot's internal beliefs about user goals cannot be observed by users. Traditional shared autonomy systems provide assistance along efficient shortest paths toward inferred goals, but when multiple objects lie in similar directions, such assistive motion remains ambiguous and fails to reveal the specific goal identified by the robot. This creates two critical problems. First, when the robot correctly infers the goal, users continue controlling because they cannot perceive understanding from ambiguous assistive motion, wasting effort when autonomous completion would suffice. Second, when the robot misunderstands intent, users cannot quickly detect errors until assistive motion diverges significantly, requiring substantial corrective input. We address this by introducing legible motion into shared autonomy, where robot actions must both advance toward the goal and clearly reveal which goal has been inferred, enabling users to understand the robot's beliefs and adjust control accordingly. The robot modulates communication strength through confidence-aware adaptive authority allocation by providing assertive legible assistive actions when confident while increasing user authority when uncertain, transforming shared autonomy into transparent bidirectional collaboration. User studies including simulation, and physical experiments with a six-degree-of-freedom robot arm demonstrate that legible shared autonomy significantly improves users' understanding of robot beliefs and reduces user control effort compared to standard shared autonomy.