From extreme weather to agricultural consequences with agentic AI
Organizations: Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA. · Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. · School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. · Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA.
Abstract
Extreme weather is forecast days ahead, yet its consequences for agriculture remain hard to predict: a forecast says where a storm will strike, not which crops will suffer or how much is at risk, and the records that could tell span many sources. We present WxCrop, the first agent that judges agricultural hazards from physically interpretable weather indices examined by causal analysis, and the first that combines weather and agricultural information to predict crop loss reliably for past and forecast dates. We demonstrate it in Florida on hurricanes, freezes and dry heat, with a loss model calibrated on insurance records for each, and the same procedure extends to other hazards and areas. Three checks show reliability: the hurricane index detects recorded cyclone days with an AUC of 0.98, recorded losses in held-out years are reproduced to within 2%, and independent production records confirm the county rankings (rank correlation 0.63). Users ask the agent for each crop group's loss as a fraction of expected season value, every number sourced, so that governments, growers and scientists respond to agricultural disasters quickly.
Figures & tables
| Hazard family | Florida (%) | Nine south-eastern states (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane / tropical ∗ | 36.6 | 5.2 |
| Excess moisture / flood | 30.2 | 21.4 |
| Freeze / cold ∗ | 14.2 | 3.7 |
| Drought / heat ∗ | 13.1 | 59.3 |
| Wind (non-cyclone) | 3.4 | 4.2 |
| Hail | 0.9 | 5.9 |
| Kind | Quantity or use | Dataset | Provides | Period |
| Weather | Wind in cyclones | HURDAT2 best track [ 43 ] | Centre, maximum wind and radii, six-hourly | 2004–2024 |
| Wind elsewhere | ERA5 [ 44 ] , High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) [ 45 ] | Daily maximum 10-m gust | 2004–2024, HRRR from 2014 | |
| Threatening cyclone | National Hurricane Center forecast | Forecast track and wind radii | Up to five days | |
| Rain | Analysis of Record for Calibration (AORC) [ 46 ] | Daily precipitation (1 km) | 2004–2024 | |
| Freeze | Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) [ 47 ] , ERA5 | Minimum temperature, night cloud cover | Winters 2003–26 | |
| Drought and heat | gridded Surface Meteorological dataset (gridMET) [ 48 ] | Precipitation, evapotranspiration, maximum temperature | 2003–2026 |
| Step | Candidate (data) | Result | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs (area under the curve, AUC) | Wind, rain, ponding depth, wet hours (HURDAT2, AORC, National Water Model) | AUC for cyclone days: wind 0.980, rain 0.871, ponding 0.838, wet hours 0.729 | Wind and rain |
| Form (area under the curve, AUC) | Wind alone above a zero point, wind rain, wind rain dose, exponent 2 or 3, zero point fixed or free | AUC for cyclone days 0.970, 0.972, 0.921, best 0.981. Agreement with UF/IFAS reports 0.689, 0.703, 0.703, best 0.704 (exponent 2, free zero point) | Dynamic pressure, free zero point |
| Design (difference-in-differences, DiD) | , Florida, 24,053 rows | Effect [0.120, 0.210]. Before the storm , , . Tiers , , , . Model | Passed |
| Factor (permutation) | Rain wind (AORC) | [0.030, 0.102], | Adopted, multiplier |
| Ponding, wet hours (National Water Model) | , , , small and tied to rain | Set aside | |
| Water-table depth, drainage class, tree age, days since storm | –0.98, or sign opposite | Set aside |
| Step | Candidate (data) | Result | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form (area under the curve, AUC) | Depth below 0 ∘ C, below the second or fifth percentile design temperature (ERA5, PRISM) | AUC for freeze days 0.870, 0.935, 0.981. PRISM farmland-weighted mean 0.991 | PRISM, fifth percentile |
| Design (difference-in-differences, DiD) | ∘ C-equivalent, Florida winter, 10,099 rows | Effect [0.009, 0.083]. Before the freeze , , . Tiers , , , . Model | Passed |
| Factor (permutation) | Night cloud cover | , , sign as expected. Rank correlation 0.334 against 0.327 | Adopted, clear-sky factor |
| Freezing degree-hours † | , , sign as expected. Rank correlation 0.366 against 0.364, correlated 0.82 with depth | Verified, not deployed | |
| Night wind, previous 14-day temperature | ( ), ( ), sign opposite | Set aside | |
| Previous-day maximum † , previous 30-day cold † , soil water | , 0.53, 0.90 | Set aside |
| Step | Candidate (data) | Result | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form (area under the curve, AUC) | Deficit window of 30 to 270 days, precipitation alone (gridMET, SPEI) | AUC for severe drought 0.71, 0.81, 0.85, 0.88, 0.89, 0.85. Precipitation alone 0.83 | 120 days |
| Design (difference-in-differences, DiD) | Season index classes, Florida insured field crops, 1,125 rows | Effect of the top decile . Classes , , , . Model (mean effect [ , 0.066]) | Dose response monotone |
| Factor (rank correlation, permutation) | Flash-drought term (30-day deficit) | Rank correlation 0.577 against 0.545 for the slow deficit alone | Adopted, added to the dose |
| Heat (degree-days above 32 ∘ C) | against a permutation 95th percentile of 0.072 | Adopted, multiplier | |
| Vapour-pressure deficit, antecedent rain, irrigated fraction, soil water capacity | , 0.40, 0.41, sign opposite. Antecedent rain depends on the window | Set aside |
| Step | Candidate (data) | Result | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Label | Damaged acreage, loss cost, recovered damage fraction | Rank correlation with county citrus production shortfalls 0.36, 0.47, 0.58 | Recovered damage fraction |
| Crop dependence | Effect of by crop group (difference-in-differences, DiD) | Citrus , cotton , peanuts , tobacco , vegetables , grains and oilseeds , other fruit , sugarcane | Susceptibility by group |
| Structure | Four equally weighted factors, wind alone, with | Storm-month rank correlation, leave-one-year-out, 0.351, 0.361, 0.397 | |
| Yield vulnerability | Floor of 0.02, establishment-cost fractions | Rank correlation 0.405, 0.405 | Establishment-cost fractions |
| Storm periphery, moisture | Fraction of county m s -1 , thresholds by group, hours above 18 m s -1 , rainfall extremes, wet-day runs, soil moisture, ponding | Every metric within the permutation spread | Set aside |
| Payout probability | with a background rate and a storm scale | Brier score 0.177 against 0.224 for the climatological rate | Adopted |
Disaster Damage Assessment
Disaster damage assessment uses imagery and geospatial data to locate, classify, and quantify damage for emergency response and recovery.
See all 51 papers