GlucoAgent: Personalized Glucose Forecasting from Multimodal Personal Context

Accurate blood glucose forecasting using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data can support the early prediction of dysglycemic risk. However, current neural-network-based forecasting models treat CGM data as a purely numerical sequence without integrating the contextual information contained in CGM signal morphology. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for time-series forecasting, yet their role as agentic context extractors in diabetes care remains largely unexplored. In this study, we bridge glucose forecasting and LLM-based contextualization by developing GlyRAG, a context-aware, retrieval-augmented forecasting framework that uses an LLM as a contextualization agent to summarize glucose morphology directly from a timed CGM window. The generated CGM-only narrative is embedded and fused with patch-based glucose representations, while a retrieval module incorporates similar historical training episodes through cross-attention. We evaluate GlyRAG on the OhioT1DM and AZT1D datasets for 5-, 30-, and 60-minute forecasting horizons. Compared with strong CGM-only baselines, GPT-4 GlyRAG significantly improves long-horizon root mean square error (RMSE) over PatchTST on both datasets. For example, RMSE decreases from 13.8 to 10.6 at 30 minutes and from 23.1 to 20.2 at 60 minutes on OhioT1DM. LLaMA 3.1 produces smaller but significant long-horizon gains, suggesting that the contextualization pipeline is not limited to GPT-4. Clinical error-grid analyses further show that approximately 85 percent of predictions fall within the clinically acceptable Clarke Error Grid Zones A and B. These results suggest that CGM-derived linguistic context and case-based retrieval can improve long-horizon glucose forecasting without requiring additional sensing modalities.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides high-frequency measurements of glucose dynamics and enables short-term glucose forecasting for diabetes management. Although time-series foundation models have shown strong general forecasting ability, their effectiveness for CGM prediction and the added value of multimodal dietary context remain unclear. We conduct a comprehensive empirical study using eight public CGM datasets spanning Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes, and non-diabetes populations. Under a unified protocol across multiple context lengths and prediction horizons, zero-shot foundation models did not consistently outperform strong task-specific baselines such as Elastic Net and PatchTST. In contrast, lightweight fine-tuning substantially improved forecasting performance. For example, fine-tuned Chronos-Bolt reduced RMSE by 6.5%-18.4% in the T1D cohort and by 8.6%-18.2% in the non-diabetes/T2D cohort, with comparable improvements in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test settings. We further evaluate multimodal dietary context using CGMacros, which provides temporally aligned CGM signals, food images, and macronutrient records. A residual-based fusion framework reduced overall RMSE by approximately 3% and postprandial RMSE by approximately 15% relative to the CGM-only baseline. Moreover, Chronos-based CGM representations were more strongly correlated with observed postprandial glucose increments than representations from LSTM and CatBoost, even after those models incorporated additional dietary modalities, suggesting that pretrained temporal representations better preserve meal-induced excursion patterns. These findings show that foundation models require CGM-specific adaptation for reliable forecasting and that dietary context provides clinically meaningful signals beyond CGM alone, especially during postprandial periods.

Glucose forecasting algorithms are an important aspect of glycemic control management in type 1 diabetes. So far, the research community has developed numerous algorithms and models for forecasting. However, it is well-recognized that the lack of standardized model performance evaluation benchmarks makes fair comparison difficult and hinders further innovation, and thus benchmark standardization is in urgent need. Furthermore, many published glucose forecasting algorithms are limited to CGM data alone, ignoring other multimodal signals such as insulin dosing and carbohydrate intake. Here, we introduce MetaboNet-Bench, a benchmark for multimodal glucose forecasting for patients with type 1 diabetes that provides an extensible open-source evaluation framework for comparison of glucose forecasting algorithms that leverage glucose, insulin, and carbohydrate data. We then demonstrate its utility by benchmarking several recently published glucose forecasting models and a custom multimodal time-series model, representing different model architectures. The results show that the benefit of adding data modalities is conditioned on the complexity of the model and that incorporating more clinical metrics helps identify meaningful gaps to fill for future research.