Lightweight Path-Aware Frontier Re-ranking for LiDAR-Based UAV Exploration
Organizations: Vietnam National University, University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Viet Nam. · College of Engineering and Computer Science, VinUniversity, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam. · School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi 923-1292, Japan. · Center for AI Research, VinUniversity, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam.
Abstract
Autonomous 3D exploration with UAVs requires efficient target selection under limited flight time and onboard computation. In conventional Euclidean-distance-based frontier pipelines, geometric distance may poorly represent the actual collision-free travel cost in cluttered environments, leading to inefficient frontier choices. This paper presents a lightweight path-aware frontier re-ranking method for LiDAR-based UAV exploration. The method first retains a small top-N set of promising frontier candidates using a lightweight utility function and then applies time-bounded RRT* planning to estimate their feasible path costs for re-ranking. The path generated for the selected frontier is further reused for navigation to reduce redundant global planning. Experiments in three warehouse-like environments show that the proposed method consistently produces shorter exploration trajectories than conventional frontier baselines, with traveled-distance reductions of up to 14.1%, while reducing exploration time by up to 9.5% in two environments and remaining competitive in the third. The method maintains map detail comparable to the conventional OctoMap-based baseline, demonstrating an effective trade-off between exploration efficiency and mapping quality.
Figures & tables
| Environments | Methods | Metrics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (min) | (m) | (%) | ||
| Env. 1 | MRF [ 11 ] | |||
| FCS [ 2 ] | ||||
| EPIC [ 4 ] | – | |||
| Ours | ||||
| Ours w/o reusable path | ||||
| Parameter | Environment | Value | Metrics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (min) | (m) | (%) | |||
| Env. 1 | 2 | 7.46 | 332.41 | 97.79 | |
| 3 | 7.53 | 332.79 | 97.45 | ||
| 4 | 7.92 | 335.45 | 97.78 | ||
| Env. 2 | 2 | 8.75 | 387.93 | 97.44 | |
| 3 | 8.42 | 363.67 | 97.32 | ||