Overview

AI safety evaluation asks whether models and AI systems behave safely—not only on isolated prompts, but across conversations, tool use, human-AI teams, and physical or high-stakes settings. Common approaches include red-teaming and adversarial testing, curated benchmarks, simulated agent tasks, human studies, runtime monitoring, and formal verification. Evaluations measure outcomes such as harmful assistance, missed hazards, refusal quality, robustness to shifts, and effects on users or interacting agents. A central challenge is that strong benchmark results provide limited assurance about rare failures or deployment behavior, so evaluations must make their assumptions and evidence limits explicit.

Latest papers

CardsList

143 papers21 papers in the last four weeks, up 75% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. Breakdowns in Conversational AI: Interactional Failures in Emotionally and Ethically Sensitive Contexts

    Apr 3, 2026Jiawen Deng, Wentao Zhang, Ziyun Jiao +1Human-AI InteractionAI Safety Evaluation

  2. I must delete the evidence: AI Agents Explicitly Cover up Fraud and Violent Crime

    Apr 2, 2026Thomas RivasseauAI Agent SafetyAI Ethics

  3. UK AISI Alignment Evaluation Case-Study

    Apr 1, 2026Alexandra Souly, Robert Kirk, Jacob Merizian +2AI Agent SafetyAI Safety Evaluation

  4. M-CARE: Standardized Clinical Case Reporting for AI Model Behavioral Disorders, with a 20-Case Atlas and Experimental Validation

    Mar 27, 2026Jihoon JeongAI Agent EvaluationAI Safety Evaluation

  5. AEGIS: An Operational Infrastructure for Post-Market Governance of Adaptive Medical AI Under US and EU Regulations

    Mar 20, 2026Fardin Afdideh, Mehdi Astaraki, Fernando Seoane +1AI GovernanceResponsible AI

  6. Soft-Label Governance for Distributional Safety in Multi-Agent Systems

    Mar 19, 2026Aizierjiang Aiersilan, Raeli SavittAI Agent GovernanceAI Risk Management

  7. SafeTutors: Benchmarking Pedagogical Safety in AI Tutoring Systems

    Mar 18, 2026Rima Hazra, Bikram Ghuku, Ilona Marchenko +5Intelligent Tutoring SystemsAI Safety Evaluation

  8. Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

    Mar 17, 2026Hiroki FukuiMulti-Agent LLM SystemsMulti-Agent Orchestration

  9. Questionnaire Responses Do not Capture the Safety of AI Agents

    Mar 15, 2026Max Hellrigel-Holderbaum, Edward James YoungAI Safety EvaluationLLM Safety Alignment

  10. Evaluating Human-AI Safety: A Framework for Measuring Harmful Capability Uplift

    Mar 6, 2026Michelle Vaccaro, Jaeyoon Song, Abdullah Almaatouq +1AI Safety EvaluationLLM Safety Evaluation

  11. Measuring AI R&D Automation

    Mar 4, 2026Alan Chan, Ranay Padarath, Joe Kwon +2AI Risk ManagementHuman Oversight of AI

  12. SEED-SET: Scalable Evolving Experimental Design for System-level Ethical Testing

    Mar 2, 2026Anjali Parashar, Yingke Li, Eric Yang Yu +4AI Safety EvaluationBenchmark Design

  13. When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies

    Feb 24, 2026Nelson Gardner-Challis, Jonathan Bostock, Georgiy Kozhevnikov +4AI Agent MonitoringAI Safety

  14. AI Alignment Breaks at the Edge

    Feb 23, 2026Han Bao, Yue Huang, Xiaoda Wang +5LLM AlignmentAI Safety Evaluation

  15. PB-OEL: A Performance-Bounded Online Ensemble Learning Framework With Mixed Feedback for Real-Time Safety Assessment

    Mar 19, 2025Songqiao Hu, Zeyi Liu, Lufeng Hao +2Ensemble LearningAI Safety Evaluation