Benchmark Contamination
Overview
Benchmark contamination studies how exposure to test examples, answers, or recognizable cues can distort model evaluations and claims of generalization. Researchers use exact and semantic overlap audits, controlled exposure with matched clean controls, and behavioral probes that compare performance on original items with paraphrased, temporal, or freshly generated variants. These methods are applied to settings such as language-model reasoning and coding benchmarks, as well as medical and scientific datasets; mitigation includes sealed or live evaluations and careful data decontamination. No single audit is reliable across settings: detectors can miss generalized leakage or raise false alarms, while aggressive filtering can discard clean data, leaving a tension between transparent, reusable benchmarks and evaluations resistant to exposure.
Latest papers
49 papers8 papers in the last four weeks, up 100% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.