Knapsack Constraint

The one-dimensional bin packing problem (1D-BPP) is a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with applications ranging from logistics and manufacturing to cloud resource management. Although deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has become a competitive paradigm for data-driven optimization, most learned packing methods target 2D and 3D variants, and intelligent learned solvers for 1D-BPP remain scarce. In this paper, we present a novel end-to-end, size-agnostic graph reinforcement learning framework for 1D-BPP. We formulate the packing process as a Markov decision process on an item-compatibility graph, serving as a structural knowledge representation in which every action merges two partial bins that fit together. A graph neural network actor-critic policy extracts relational features from this representation and is trained through reinforcement learning and decoded by stochastic beam search, enabling a single trained model to generalize zero-shot to instances of any size. We conduct a systematic empirical study across graph encoders, DRL algorithms, reward functions, training distributions, and hyperparameters. Evaluated zero-shot on the full BPPLIB benchmark against a constructive heuristic, a grouping genetic algorithm, and recent learned methods, our data-driven policy lowers the mean optimality gap of the constructive heuristic from 2.66% to 2.31%, with the largest gains on structured instances. Against learned baselines evaluated on the same benchmark, it attains a lower gap on most of the nine families and is far more stable across instance distributions. On the hardest benchmark family, it outperforms a state-of-the-art learned solver that relies on column generation and integer programming, while using no solver at all. A grouping genetic algorithm remains ahead overall, and we analyze where and why the residual gap arises.

Structured pruning is a promising approach for compressing large language models (LLMs), yet existing methods rely heavily on greedy heuristics that produce myopic decisions, and often fail to precisely meet target compression budgets. We present SNIPER, a two-stage structured pruning framework that solves a knapsack optimization over coarse-granularity components to yield conditionally optimal parameter allocations with respect to fixed importance estimates, followed by a fine-grained pruning stage to meet strict budget constraints. We introduce the Compression Ratio Adherence Factor (CRAFT) to quantify budget fidelity, showing that while existing pruners deviate from target compression ratios by up to 33%, SNIPER achieves near-exact adherence with a CRAFT score of 0.98. Evaluations across four diverse architectures over a set of 18 tasks spanning five domains demonstrate SNIPER's consistent improvements in average performance retention and task-level stability over six state-of-the-art pruners. Across all pruning configurations, SNIPER achieves an excellent mean rank of 1.25, indicating its robust cross-architectural generalizability and excellent reliability.

We study new algorithms for Contextual Bandits with Knapsack. In these problems, there are finitely many types of customers, products, and resources. Each product is made from a fixed combination of resources, and resources have finite capacity. A decision maker must assign each arriving customer one out of a set of multiple possible products. Every assignment of a customer to a product will generate a random reward, which equals an unknown linear function of customer and product features, plus a noise term. The objective is to jointly learn the mean reward function, and to make online assignments to minimize the expected revenue loss relative to an optimal policy that knows the reward function. We propose a natural and simple extension of the Upper-Confidence-Bound (UCB) family of algorithms and apply re-optimization techniques. We show that by taking advantage of re-optimization, our algorithm achieves an average regret of $O(\frac{(\ln T)^3}{T})$ where $T$ is the horizon length. Our bound significantly reduces the $O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{T}})$ bound in the literature for closely related dynamic-pricing problems that are based on re-optimization.

Evolutionary multitasking is a recent approach that solves multiple related optimization problems within a single evolutionary run, rather than addressing each problem separately. We consider monotone submodular optimization problems with dynamic knapsack constraints and study a multitasking formulation in which all tasks share a common monotone submodular function $f$, but differ in their constraints. We focus on the case where elements within each constraint have uniform cost and show that this structure leads to small Pareto fronts in the multitasking formulation. This enables solution sharing across tasks and can improve performance compared to running standard evolutionary approaches independently, depending on the constraint regime. Using rigorous runtime analysis, we analyze the expected time until the proposed multitasking algorithms obtain a $(1 - 1/e)$-approximation for each task. Experimental results for the Maximum Coverage problem complement the theoretical analysis and provide further insight into the practical behavior of the approach across different budget settings.

Activation checkpointing minimizes the runtime of neural networks under a given memory budget, by selecting which intermediate tensors to store and which to recompute. PyTorch solves this as a 0/1 knapsack problem, where operations from a joint forward-backward computation graph are items with a memory cost (weight) and a runtime saving (value). The default solver, dp_knapsack, allocates a full dynamic programming (DP) table of shape $(n+1) \times (W+1)$, where $n$ is the number of operations and $W$ is the quantized memory budget. This method is resource-hungry and crashes at $n = 100$ items on a machine with 64 GB RAM. In this paper, we introduce dp_knapsack_sliding_hirschberg, which combines the sliding window trick and Hirschberg's algorithm to reduce peak memory from $O(nW)$ to $O(W)$ while preserving the exact optimal solution. Our experiments show successful knapsack execution at $n = 2000$, where dp_knapsack fails at $n = 100$, a 20$\times$ increase in computable problem size. In addition, our benchmarks show a consistent 25-28% runtime speedup over dp_knapsack. The implementation is merged into PyTorch and released in version 2.10.

Competitive analysis is central to the study of online algorithms, but upper bounds are often highly problem-specific. We develop a more unifying methodology via the minimax viewpoint. Guided by Yao's principle, we reduce worst-case competitive analysis to Bayesian online design under an arbitrary correlated prior over arrival sequences. For such a prior, let $X^*$ be the hindsight-optimal fractional solution for the realized instance, and let $X^{(t)}=\mathbb E[X^*\mid \mathcal F_t]$ be its posterior process. Our guiding rule is posterior matching: at each time $t$, choose the feasible online action that tracks the current posterior $X^{(t)}$ as closely as the online constraints permit. We show that this single principle yields optimal or near-optimal guarantees for several classical online fractional problems, including set cover, load balancing, matching and more general resource-allocation problems, recovering or improving state-of-the-art bounds in these settings with norm/concave objectives. Via known rounding reductions, it also yields randomized integral guarantees for weighted paging, MTS on star metrics, and ski-rental. At a technical level, our analysis reduces competitive guarantees to key probabilistic inequalities for the vector martingales generated by the posterior of the offline optimum. The resulting framework gives a reusable route from Bayesian online design under arbitrary correlated priors to information-theoretic worst-case competitive guarantees.

3D bin packing rectangular items into standardised containers to maximise space utilisation under geometric shipping automation. Loading a furniture purchase into a personal vehicle is the same task, but under more complex conditions that standard container loading algorithms ignore. This paper addresses the physically stable placement under these realistic conditions with heterogeneous boxes (e.g. varying dimensions and weights) and occupied containers (e.g. groceries). This paper provides a real-world benchmark dataset and baseline model for the Heterogeneous furniture-in-vehicle packing task. The dataset uses real furniture company flat-pack packaging data covering a large number of catalogue products via family-level extrapolation with diversity length, widths, heights, and weights. We also propose a PackingGPT framework for packing as a sequential placement inspired by the Lego assembly process, where heterogeneous boxes of varying dimensions (bricks) are placed step-by-step into the irregular remaining cargo space (creations). Five baseline packing methods were tested on our dataset without considering the Centre-of- Mass (CoM) constraints. In sedan car simulations, 10-40% of placed boxes failed the stability check on average. When the LLP model was trained on packing sequences with CoM constraints enforced during placement, the failure rate dropped to 0.67% (SUV-500).

The online three-dimensional bin packing problem (3D-BPP) is a longstanding challenge in logistics and industrial palletizing. Recent learning-based methods use a learned policy to select among feasible candidate placements. Performance depends on the candidate generator and representation, especially in industrial settings where packings must be space-efficient, stable, compact, and balanced. However, prior work has mainly optimized the policy, while candidate generation and representation remain largely geometry-driven. We address this gap with OPAL, an operationally guided placement-aware learning framework for industrial online 3D-BPP which combines an Operationally Guided Empty-Maximal-Space generator (OG-EMS), an operational representation for each candidate placement, and a masked ranking policy trained with proximal policy optimization. OG-EMS evaluates multiple anchors within each free-space region and prioritizes low, well-supported, compact, and spatially diverse placements. An xLSTM-based Placement Encoder models dependencies among geometric and operational candidate attributes, while a lightweight recurrent core combines the resulting embeddings with the current item and pallet state to rank feasible actions. On the BED-BPP benchmark, OPAL achieves a mean space utilization of 0.49, with improvements of 15.1% from operationally guided candidate generation and 6.3% from learned ranking, while maintaining robust inference-time performance.

We study an online variant of discrete fair division under generalized assignment budget constraints. Goods arrive one at a time and must be assigned irrevocably to a feasible agent or to charity, which holds all unallocated goods, while fairness is evaluated only against budget-feasible subsets of every recipient's bundle. We first show that, without additional structure, no deterministic online algorithm can guarantee any fixed approximation to feasible envy-freeness, even in highly symmetric instances. We then identify bounded density spread as a structural condition that restores meaningful guarantees, obtaining approximation algorithms for arbitrary item sizes and showing that, under common valuations and sufficiently small goods, these guarantees can be strengthened to an optimal deterministic frontier. We further study resource augmentation, where the online algorithm is allowed slightly larger budgets than the fairness benchmark, and characterize the resulting improvement in the achievable guarantees. Finally, we develop a learning-augmented framework based on predicting joint value-size types, proving consistency under perfect predictions, robustness to prediction error, and showing that separate predictions of value and size marginals are insufficient to recover strong fairness guarantees.

Submodular maximization is an important building block for developing algorithms in many areas such as machine learning and data mining. Due to the NP-hardness of the problem, analysis of submodular maximization algorithms typically provides pessimistic worst-case approximation factors only. It is not easy to evaluate how close a produced solution is to an optimal one for a given problem instance. In this paper, we develop new data-dependent upper bounds for submodular maximization with a knapsack constraint. We theoretically prove that they dominate the optimal solution and empirically demonstrate their advantages in certifying how close to optimal a solution is through experiments with real-world datasets.

The one-dimensional bin packing problem (1D-BPP) is a canonical NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with broad industrial applications. We propose RL-HGGA, a hybrid algorithm that integrates Falkenauer's Hybrid Grouping Genetic Algorithm (HGGA) with a tabular Q-learning controller. Rather than applying genetic operators at fixed probabilities, a Q-learning agent dynamically selects among eight macro-actions -- including BPCX crossover, light and heavy mutation, Martello-Toth local search, and population restart -- based on an eight-dimensional state representation encoding generation progress, stagnation level, optimality gap, average fitness, population variance, and average bin fill rate. The agent is trained with an epsilon-greedy policy over 400 episodes, with epsilon decaying to 0.05. Experiments on standard benchmark families (Falkenauer T/U, Scholl 1-3, Hard28) show that RL-HGGA achieves an average optimality gap of 0.95% -- competitive with HGGA (0.75%) and well below FFD (2.47%) -- while reducing mean computation time from 64.22 s to 1.29 s, a 50x speedup. These results demonstrate that learned adaptive operator selection can achieve near-HGGA solution quality at a fraction of the computational cost.

We study online resource allocation when both rewards and consumption sizes may be continuously distributed. Requests arrive sequentially and must be accepted or rejected irrevocably under fixed resource capacities. Each request belongs to one of finitely many observable types; conditional on an observable request type, both the reward and the scalar size are random, and the realized size scales a fixed type-specific resource-consumption vector. The model allows the deterministic fluid relaxation to be degenerate. We show that additive regret is governed by the size-weighted mass of requests whose value-to-size ratios lie near the active acceptance cutoffs. We formalize this quantity through an active weighted-mass exponent p. When p > 1, this cutoff mass is thin, and the problem is genuinely hard: every online policy must incur regret of order at least $T^{1/2 - 1/(2p)}$, and this holds for every p > 1. A sample-path marginal policy matches this lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors; and when p = 1, so that the mass grows linearly near the cutoff, it attains $O((\log T)^2)$ regret. For example, if the size and the value-to-size ratio are independent and uniformly distributed, then p = 1; if instead the size and the reward are independent and uniformly distributed, then p = 2. Thus the policy achieves $o(\sqrt{T})$ regret throughout this regularity class without any fluid non-degeneracy assumption, allowing both primal degeneracy and dual non-uniqueness.

Training-free compression methods for large language models (LLMs) often use calibration data to guide compression decisions. ROCKET, a recent method combining sparse-dictionary factorization with multi-choice knapsack problem (MCKP) allocation, derives its per-layer factorization from an output reconstruction objective but uses weight-space Frobenius error as the MCKP allocation cost. We investigate whether aligning the allocation cost with the output-space objective improves compressed model fidelity. On Qwen3-8B at 50% compression, our ROCKET-ActCost achieves +0.8 percentage points higher average accuracy across 8 zero-shot benchmarks (53.1% vs 52.3%), but increases WikiText perplexity by 16% (61.46 vs 52.98). This accuracy-perplexity tradeoff reveals that different allocation objectives favor different downstream metrics. The high correlation ($>$0.99) between weight-space and output-space errors limits allocation divergence, explaining the modest effect size. On Llama-3.2-1B at 20% compression, the two methods produce near-identical results (53.3% vs 53.5% accuracy, 14.45 vs 14.66 PPL), suggesting that the effect of the cost function is minor at lower compression ratios.

Network routers that enforce Quality-of-Service (QoS) guarantees must decide, at every clock cycle, which expiring packet of information to transmit, even when the value of the packet is unknown until it is processed. We frame this problem as the Online Packet Scheduling with Deadlines (OPSD) problem under Partial Feedback: packets arrive at every clock cycle, with different deadlines, but the weights are only observed after execution. Under a stochastic assumption on the unknown weights, we explore different variants of the OPSD problem with bandit feedback. We establish a connection between our setting and the sleeping bandits problem, and set our learning goal to $α$-regret minimization. We provide algorithms with provable $α$-regret guarantees under different spans of slackness, distinguishing systems allowing for randomization and systems that do not. In every scenario, our algorithms achieve an $α$-regret upper bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(\sqrt{KT}\right)$, matching the lower bound for the standard bandit setting. In the practically relevant case of $2$-bounded deadline instances, where the deadline is set at most one clock cycle away from the arrival, our deterministic algorithm achieves the provably tightest possible competitive ratio. Remarkably, when the number of distinct packet types $K\ge 2$ is finite, it is possible to break the well-established $Φ= \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ competitive ratio barrier and attain a tighter competitive ratio $θ_K$ ranging in $[\sqrt{2}, Φ)$.

Given items of different sizes and a fixed bin capacity, the bin-packing problem is to pack these items into the minimum number of bins such that the sum of the item sizes in each bin does not exceed the capacity. We define a new variant, k-times bin-packing (kBP), in which the goal is to pack the items so that each item appears exactly k times in k different bins. We generalize existing approximation algorithms for bin-packing to solve kBP and analyze their performance ratios. The fair electricity division problem motivates the study of kBP. The goal is to allocate the available supply among households using some fairness criteria, such as the egalitarian principle. We prove that every electricity division problem can be solved by k-times bin-packing for some finite k, which depends only on the number of households. We implement generalizations of the First-Fit and First-Fit Decreasing bin-packing algorithms to solve kBP and apply them to real electricity demand data. We show that our generalizations outperform existing heuristic solutions to the same problem in terms of the egalitarian allocation of connection time. We study another variant of the egalitarian allocation problem, in which the goal is to maximize the minimum number of watts allocated to a household. For this variant, we prove an impossibility result: there does not exist such a k that depends only on the number of agents. This impossibility result motivates us to develop four different heuristic algorithms to solve the egalitarian allocation of watts problem. We evaluate the heuristics by summing the minimum watts allocated to any household in each hour, yielding a fairness metric that reflects the lowest watt allocation across all hours. A higher total minimum of watts indicates a more equitable distribution. Thus, we establish new benchmarks for fair allocation of watts.

We study optimal policy learning under combined budget and minimum coverage constraints. We show that the problem admits a knapsack-type structure and that the optimal policy can be characterized by an affine threshold rule involving both budget and coverage shadow prices. We establish that the linear programming relaxation of the combinatorial solution has an O(1) integrality gap, implying asymptotic equivalence with the optimal discrete allocation. Building on this result, we analyze two implementable approaches: a Greedy-Lagrangian (GLC) and a rank-and-cut (RC) algorithm. We show that the GLC closely approximates the optimal solution and achieves near-optimal performance in finite samples. By contrast, RC is approximately optimal whenever the coverage constraint is slack or costs are homogeneous, while misallocation arises only when cost heterogeneity interacts with a binding coverage constraint. Monte Carlo evidence supports these findings.

Generating long-horizon music videos (MVs) is frequently constrained by prohibitive computational costs and difficulty maintaining cross-shot consistency. We propose AllocMV, a hierarchical framework formulating music video synthesis as a Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem (MCKP). AllocMV represents the video's persistent state as a compact, structured object comprising character entities, scene priors, and sharing graphs, produced by a global planner prior to realization. By estimating segment saliency from multimodal cues, a group-level MCKP solver based on dynamic programming optimally allocates resources across High-Gen, Mid-Gen, and Reuse branches. For repetitive musical motifs, we implement a divergence-based forking strategy that reuses visual prefixes to reduce costs while ensuring motif-level continuity. Evaluated via the Cost-Quality Ratio (CQR), AllocMV achieves an optimal trade-off between perceived quality and resource expenditure under strict budgetary and rhythmic constraints.

Pareto optimization via evolutionary multi-objective algorithms has been shown to efficiently solve constrained monotone submodular functions. Traditionally when solving multiple problems, the algorithm is run for each problem separately. We introduce multitasking formulations of these problems that are an effective way to solve multiple related problems with a single run. In our setting the given problems share a monotone submodular function $f$ but have different knapsack constraints. We examine the case where elements within a constraint have the same cost and show that our multitasking formulations result in small Pareto fronts. This allows the population to share solutions between all problems leading to significant improvements compared to running several classical approaches independently. Using rigorous runtime analysis, we analyze the expected time until the introduced multitasking approaches obtain a $(1-1/e)$-approximation for each of the given problems. Our experimental investigations for the maximum coverage problem give further insight into the dynamics behind how the approach works and doesn't work in practice for problems where elements within a constraint also have varied costs.

Packing objects efficiently is a fundamental problem in logistics, warehouse automation, and robotics. When dealing with highly diverse 3D objects (household or grocery items), closed-form solutions are infeasible, and heuristic or model-free Reinforcement Learning~(RL) methods tend to focus solely on geometric optimization, relying on exhaustive searches of the discretized solution space. This leads to long training times (for pure RL) and high latency (heuristics), limited transferability to robotic scenarios, and ultimately ignores object characteristics (fragility, deformability) and human preferences. We propose HERB, a human-augmented RL framework for packing irregular objects, the first to explore the potential of learning from human demonstrations to solve this complex task. It leverages human demonstrations of packing strategies, which inherently exhibit latent factors such as space optimization, stability, and object properties that are difficult to model explicitly. The human-expert data is combined with RL exploration to provide the placement of each object inside the container. Experimental results show that our method outperforms heuristic, purely RL-based, and imitation learning approaches in packing efficiency and latency. Qualitative results highlight that our packing strategy produces more stable, human-like arrangements, which we expect to be more appropriate and widely accepted. Finally, we demonstrate the real-world feasibility of our method on a robotic system.

To solve the fractional knapsack problem, Dantzig's greedy rule orders items according to their value-to-cost ratio. This ordering introduces priority issues. An arbitrarily small perturbation to the input can change the allocation if the budget is exhausted between two items with very similar ratios. To mitigate that problem, we introduce a two-stage rule. We group items sharing attributes within a radius $\delta$. These groups are then evaluated in descending order of ratio, and divide their group's budget share without further ranking. Consider a group featuring an aggregate capacity $U_G$, unit costs contained in $[w^-,w^+]$, and a representative value $\widehat{v}$. The group's loss compared to the exact optimum is bounded by $\widehat{v}\, U_G\frac{w^+-w^-}{w^++w^-}+\varepsilon_v U_G$, in which $\varepsilon_v$ limits the group's internal value variation. Moreover, for any group size, this harmonic factor remains tight. The overall loss becomes restricted to the single budget-binding group whenever the grouping remains order-compatible; thus, groups containing at most $K$ items suffer a per-item loss of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{K}{n})$. Should group ratio intervals exhibit an overlap of at most $\omega$, an additive term $\omega C$ degrades this bound. Within the separation margin between adjacent groups, the grouped allocation remains Lipschitz continuous with respect to cost data, exhibiting a modulus of $\frac{K}{w_{\min}}$. Computing this allocation takes $\mathcal{O}(n+m\log m+|\Gamma|\log|\Gamma|)$ time given $m$ groups and a boundary group $\Gamma$. Alternatively, the time complexity drops to $\mathcal{O}(n+m\log m)$ if a linear-time selection method identifies the boundary group's allocation.