Malware Detection

Malware detection is a critical task in cybersecurity, and graph neural networks over control flow graphs have shown promising results for it. However, detectors are usually evaluated on a random split of a corpus collected over a single period, which cannot show how well a model generalizes to later samples. This study addresses that limitation with a strict temporal split: every model is trained on one period and scored once on a later one. Two corpora of control flow graphs, each node carrying 37 features, were extracted statically from 1,989 Windows portable executables: 459 graphs from 2024-2025 for training and 223 from 2026 for evaluation. Twelve variants and a flat-feature control were trained on the earlier corpus. The choice of message-passing operator changes robustness to the shift significantly, and every pairwise gap that survives correction separates an aggregating architecture from one built around a learned attentional readout. The ranking also reverses: the flat control, which sees node features but no topology, is the best in-distribution model and among the worst across the boundary, so a conventional benchmark would have rejected message passing. Neither recalibration nor ensembling substitutes for the operator choice. Attributions do not shift, but explanation validity is architecture-specific, and the most accurate operator on the later corpus is the hardest to explain. An architecture derived from the finding matches the best searched operator without search. The shift affects both malware and benign classes alike, so these are results about robustness to distribution shift, not malware evolution.

Static malware detection for Windows Portable Executable files demands a careful balance between detection effectiveness, computational efficiency, and analytical interpretability. This paper introduces Delphi Scanner, a static malware detection system for Windows PE files that balances efficiency with behavioral interpretation. It uses a convolutional neural network (CNN) to model Windows API sequences to classify PE and a decoupled interpretation layer based on a rule-based layer to categorize APIs into high-level malicious capabilities. Evaluated on over 190,000 Windows PE files, the system achieves 95.35% accuracy with a 1.53~MB model footprint. Robustness experiments on 5,647 out-of-distribution MalwareBazaar samples, paired packed and unpacked executables, and three adversarial manipulation strategies confirm generalization beyond the training distribution and resistance to functionality-preserving evasion techniques. Overall, these results demonstrate that API sequence-based static analysis offers a practical, interpretable, and efficient foundation for malware triage in local deployment scenarios.

Large language models are being integrated into malware triage workflows as reasoning components that summarize static evidence and produce analyst-facing verdicts. This paper shows that the same reasoning capability introduces a new attack surface. We present ALIBI, a semantic cover story attack against frontier LLM-based malware analyzers. ALIBI adds a small, non-executed read-only section to a compiled binary, containing a coherent but false security product narrative, without altering imports or executable behavior. Instead of issuing direct instructions to the model, it reframes suspicious evidence as expected behavior of a benign endpoint security tool. On a frozen PE set of 50 malicious samples, the payload flips 30 of the 35 baseline-malicious samples to benign on Gemini 2.5 Pro, while GPT-5.5 Pro and Claude Opus 4.7 produce substantial severity downgrades with significant confidence reductions even when verdict labels are preserved. The attack transfers to ELF binaries, where Gemini flips 16 of 40. A verification-guided defense prompt roughly halves the benign verdicts, but 42.9 percent of malicious samples still reach benign. LLM malware analyzers therefore require provenance checks that separate verified facts from attacker-controlled claims, not narrative trust.

Concept drift refers to changes over time in the statistical properties of data, as compared to the data that was used to train a learning model. Machine learning models for malware detection or classification are particularly susceptible to performance degradation caused by concept drift, as attackers constantly modify existing malware. In this chapter, we analyze two machine learning-based approaches to automated concept drift detection-a novel approach based on One-Class Support Vector Machines (OCSVM) and a previously-studied technique based on Minibatch K-Means (MK-Means). For comparison we also consider Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD), a statistical technique for detecting changes in multidimensional data. We conduct an extensive series of experiments comparing the effectiveness of four learning models, namely, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting. For each of these models, we consider three distinct scenarios: A static scenario where no model retraining occurs, a periodic scenario where models are constantly retrained irrespective of concept drift, and a drift-aware scenario where models are only retrained when concept drift is detected. Under the drift-aware scenario, we analyze the tradeoff between accuracy and training efficiency using Pareto Front analysis. We find that all three concept drift detection techniques achieve classification accuracy comparable to periodic retraining, while offering substantially greater efficiency in terms of the number of models that must be retrained. In addition, drift-aware retraining based on our OCSVM technique generally outperforms the MK-Means and MMD approaches. Overall, these results provide strong evidence that we can accurately detect concept drift in malware classification models.

The rapid advancement of modern technology has led to a significant increase in the use of smart devices, such as smartphones and tablets, resulting in the widespread adoption of mobile applications. Although applications are required to undergo malware screening before being published on official app stores, many malicious applications successfully evade detection by concealing sophisticated malware variants. These malicious behaviors are often activated only during runtime, making them difficult to identify through conventional static analysis. As a result, malware may remain undetected until after installation, potentially causing irreversible damage to users and their devices. This study presents a real-time Android malware detection framework that analyzes application behavior to accurately identify and classify complex malware. The proposed approach employs a hybrid dynamic analysis technique to distinguish malicious applications from benign ones. After preprocessing and filtering the collected dataset, the applications are classified using multiple machine learning algorithms. A comprehensive performance evaluation is conducted to compare the effectiveness of different classification techniques in terms of detection accuracy and execution time. Experimental results demonstrate that a hybrid model combining Random Forest and a Multilayer Perceptron achieves the best overall performance, attaining an accuracy of 97.5% with an execution time of 22.945 seconds. The proposed framework can enhance mobile device security by enabling timely detection of malicious applications and reducing the risk of cyberattacks.

Malware clustering is a critical task in cybersecurity that helps discover threats and analyze evolving malware families. While self-supervised learning (SSL) and tabular representation learning (TRL) have achieved breakthroughs in other domains, their application to binary program clustering (the task of clustering all incoming samples regardless of label) remains largely unexplored. This study presents the first systematic investigation of SSL and TRL methods for binary program clustering, conducted in two phases on the public Ember and Bodmas datasets. In Phase 1, we establish a performance ceiling by adapting prominent vision-based SSL models (BYOL, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, VICReg) for tabular data with supervised pair generation, finding that BYOL and SimSiam achieve performance comparable to fully supervised models, while Barlow Twins and VICReg significantly underperform. In Phase 2, we evaluate purely unsupervised TRL methods against strong baselines (PCA, Autoencoder, UMAP), demonstrating that VIME establishes a new state of the art for binary program clustering. Informed by these findings, we propose VIME-R, a retrieval-augmented extension of VIME that replaces random marginal-distribution corruption with retrieval-based augmentation to generate more informative training pairs. VIME-R further improves upon VIME, achieving 2.7%-5.8% higher Homogeneity on both datasets. Our results highlight retrieval-augmented tabular representation learning as a promising direction for enhancing automated malware analysis. Code will be made available.

Malware detection using Hardware Performance Counters (HPC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve the security of computing systems as a complement to antivirus software. Hardware-based malware detectors (HMD) use Machine Learning (ML) classifiers to detect malicious application patterns. The inputs to ML classifiers are low-level performance features known as HPCs, hardware-related activity data collected from a processor at run time to profile the low-level microarchitectural behavior of an application. This paper proposes malware detection using HPCs and machine learning classifiers and highlights the effectiveness of malware detection at run-time. We use ensemble learning techniques to improve the performance of the hardware-based malware detectors, which reduces the number of necessary micro-architectural events. This improves the processor's efficiency by eliminating the need to run an application several times since a processor can measure only 2 to 8 events at a cycle. We use 18 machine-learning models along with two ensemble learning methods to evaluate the malware detection performance, creating a total of 144 different configurations. The experimental results show that the ensemble learning-based malware detection with 2 HPCs using the ensemble technique outperforms standard classifiers with 8 HPCs by up to 10%. It also matches the performance of standard ML-based detectors that use 16 HPCs while requiring only 4 HPCs, thereby enabling effective run-time malware detection.

Organizational digitalization expands cybersecurity risks, making cybersecurity an increasingly important research area in Information Systems (IS). Among these risks, malware has become a pervasive and destructive threat. Byte-based machine learning (ML) methods are widely used for malware detection but remain vulnerable to evasive behaviors that manipulate raw bytes to evade detection. Graph-based methods are less affected by such manipulations because they represent software as program graphs that capture execution behavior. However, they do not explicitly identify cohesive groups of basic blocks that jointly realize meaningful program behaviors, nor do they learn sufficiently expressive program graph representations for accurate detection. To this end, we propose MalGuard, a graph-based malware detection method for organizational malware risk management. MalGuard introduces two methodological innovations: an operational role identification approach and a program graph representation learning method. The former identifies these cohesive groups of basic blocks as operational roles, enabling the detector to capture program behaviors that may not be visible from isolated basic blocks. The latter learns expressive program graph representations by modeling interactions among operational roles, preserving sparse malicious signals, and capturing hierarchical graph structure. Extensive experiments show that MalGuard improves detection performance and reduces the expected cost of undetected malware.

Due to the lack of systematic evaluations, we are not yet able to determine which AI-based Windows malware detector to deploy in production, since existing evaluations (i) differ in terms of data used for both training and testing; (ii) do not consider temporal analysis to showcase whether models withstand the passage of time; (iii) avoid security evaluations with adversarial attacks that could highlight their brittleness against content-injection attacks; and (iv) neglect the computational requirements for deployment, risking slow inference on endpoints. For these reasons, we develop EXE-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark of AI-based Windows malware detectors. EXE-Bench assesses performance, temporal and adversarial robustness, and computational overhead, aggregating them into a single score for direct and fair model comparison. Through EXE-Bench, we highlight how evaluations conducted only after deployment are suboptimal and unable to provide a complete picture of their performance. In particular, through our analysis, we remark how much domain knowledge instilled through feature engineering is still extremely useful in this domain, resisting both time and adversarial attacks, in stark contrast with most of the deep networks that only excel right after deployment.

Malware analysis demands rapid interpretation of complex detonation reports spanning filesystem, network, and process behaviours. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities for technical artifact interpretation, the opacity and escalating API costs of closed-weight frontier models motivate exploration of open-weight alternatives. However, many open-weight models are large, demanding significant compute resources and incurring non-trivial hosting costs that place them beyond reach for resource-constrained deployments. This paper investigates whether orchestrated ensembles of small language models (SLMs) can match or exceed single LLM performance on structured questions about malware detonation reports. We established baselines by testing eleven open-weight SLMs, three cyber security pre-trained models, and six frontier LLMs on Meta's CyberSecEval Malware Analysis benchmark. We then designed and evaluated four orchestration architectures: (i) a multi-agent pipeline that decomposes analysis into structured evidence-collection and reasoning stages, (ii) an adversarial debate framework in which two agents iteratively critique each other's reasoning, (iii) a hierarchical consultation system that pairs a general-purpose SLM with a cyber-specialised expert model, and (iv) a hybrid architecture that combines evidence-grounded pipelines with adversarial debate reasoning. The hybrid system (Qwen3-4B with Foundation-Sec-8B) achieved 35.30% overall accuracy, exceeding the strongest cyber-specialised baseline (22.54%) and the strongest ungrounded frontier baseline (34.77%); when given the same evidence pipeline, grounded Gemini remained the strongest configuration at 38.22%. These findings show that evidence-grounded orchestration can substantially improve the performance of collaborative SLMs for supporting interpretation of malware detonation reports.

An increase in advanced Android malware requires the use of deep learning models, which can run on Android devices. But there is a trade-off between security and energy use, as strong detection models can drain the battery of devices fast. This work tests different Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model configurations to balance malware detection performance and energy efficiency. In this work, we compared standard FP32 models with optimized INT8 quantized neural networks with different model depths using TUANDROMD and DREBIN datasets for both classification performance and energy consumption. The results show that INT8 quantization reduces model size by about 3.5 times with a decrease in energy consumption to 0.0189 mJ per inference, while maintaining more than 99.2% detection accuracy. We found that shallow quantized architectures, such as 3-layer and 4-layer QNNs, reduce energy costs by improving throughput and shortening the time of CPU operating in a high-power state. This work shows that efficient malware protection can be achieved on resource-constrained smartphones and provides a foundation for Green AI in mobile security.

In the digital era, Portable Document Format (PDF) is one of the most widely used file formats for storing and exchanging digital documents due to its platform independence and rich functionality. However, these same capabilities have also made PDF files an attractive attack vector for cyberattackers, who embed malicious code within seemingly legitimate documents to compromise target systems. This paper presents a novel interpretable Tsetlin Machine (TM)-based framework for PDF malware detection. The proposed framework extracts salient features from PDF documents through static analysis without executing the files and employs rule-based learning to accurately classify benign and malicious PDF documents. Numerical evaluation on the RIT-PDFMal-2026 dataset demonstrates that the proposed framework achieves competitive performance, attaining an accuracy of 98.02% compared with several ML classifiers and existing methods. Moreover, the proposed framework provides intrinsic interpretability by transparently explaining its classification decisions. The combination of competitive detection performance, computational efficiency, and intrinsic interpretability makes the proposed framework a promising solution for practical PDF malware detection.

Traditional malware detection methods struggle to generalize to obfuscated or previously unseen threats. This paper introduces ThreatVisionAI, a hybrid malware family classification framework that integrates a raw-image CNN, a wavelet-based CNN, and a Vision Transformer (ViT) to capture complementary spatial, frequency-domain, and global relational features in malware images. The wavelet-based CNN captures multi-scale frequency information that helps distinguish closely related families, while the ViT branch models long-range dependencies across the image. Evaluated on the Malimg dataset, ThreatVisionAI achieves 98.01% accuracy and a weighted F1 score of 0.9742, with wavelet-domain features providing measurable gains on minority and visually similar families. These results confirm that frequency-aware and transformer-based representations improve image-based malware family classification.

Malicious Python packages have become a major threat to software supply chain ecosystems due to the widespread adoption of open-source repositories such as PyPI. Existing learning-based detection methods struggle to capture the hierarchical organization and heterogeneous interactions among different program entities. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in code understanding and semantic reasoning, they are rarely integrated with structural program representations for fine-grained malicious behavior analysis. In this paper, we propose an LLM-enhanced hierarchical heterogeneous graph representation learning framework for malicious Python package detection. The framework constructs a hierarchical heterogeneous code graph that explicitly models heterogeneous code entities and different types of structural dependencies. LLMs are further leveraged to infer function-level semantic roles, introducing an additional layer of semantic heterogeneity. Based on this graph, we develop a hierarchical heterogeneous graph neural network that performs type-aware message passing over different node and edge categories, effectively modeling malicious behavior propagation for accurate package-level classification. The framework also incorporates a function-level attribution mechanism which, combined with LLM reasoning, automatically identifies suspicious functions and localizes fine-grained malicious behaviors without human expert intervention. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show that our framework consistently outperforms traditional machine learning methods, graph-based detectors, and state-of-the-art LLMs across packages with varying sizes and dependency complexities, while providing accurate, robust, and interpretable malicious behavior localization.

Malware poses a critical and ever-evolving threat, and robust and effective systems for detecting and classifying malware are of essential importance. $n$-grams features are among the common static features used in effective machine learning systems for malware, but these features are inherently brittle. We propose an algorithm for constructing more robust features, hamm-grams, which are a special class of regular expressions having a fixed length and single-character wildcards. We devise an efficient algorithm for finding common hamm-grams using a new locality-sensitive hash designed to produce collisions among pairs of small Hamming distance and a clustering within hash buckets to place wildcards. We then demonstrate the advantages of these features in malware classification and detection tasks.

Generative AI has emerged as a significant cybersecurity threat, with several recent attack campaigns leveraging LLMs to generate code for malicious purposes via scripting languages such as PowerShell. Consequently, for cybersecurity analysts, it is imperative to investigate the offensive capabilities of AI code generators. In this paper, we propose an experimental framework to assess LLM-generated PowerShell malware, which comprises a novel sandbox approach for dynamic analysis of AI-generated malware. Furthermore, we present a novel, manually curated dataset of real-world PowerShell malware, annotated in natural language to assist the training and evaluation of LLMs. Finally, this study evaluates permissive, open-weight LLMs adapted to PowerShell malware generation. Our results reveal a high degree of similarity between real malware and LLM-generated ones in terms of triggered OS malicious events, with a median Jaccard index of 84.5% and 48.4% of instances achieving complete overlap.

Malware classification remains a challenging problem due to its inherent heterogeneity, the presence of packed binaries, and the diverse distribution of malware families. Traditional single-model detection mechanisms often fail to generalize across such diverse data, leading to degraded performance, particularly on obfuscated and rare malware samples. In this work, we propose a unified multi-task malware analysis framework based on Mixture of Experts (MoE) architectures. The proposed system evaluates performance across two different input representations, i.e., high-dimensional EMBER feature sets and raw 1D byte arrays extracted from Portable Executable files. It simultaneously performs three critical tasks: malware family classification, packed versus unpacked detection, and malware versus benign identification. By decomposing the problem into specialized expert networks and employing adaptive gating mechanisms, the model enables effective task-specific learning while maintaining overall scalability. We investigate multiple architectural variants, including Homogeneous MoE, Heterogeneous MoE, and Multi-Gate MoE (MMoE). Performance is evaluated in both standard and adversarial settings using original and mutated samples. The obtained results demonstrate that the Multi-Gate MoE model achieves the best performance, reaching a combined detection rate of 0.9744 with only $2.56\%$ failure rate. Moreover, this configuration exhibits improved robustness under mutation-induced distribution shifts. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of expert specialization and task-specific routing in handling complex malware distributions, making the proposed framework a promising direction for scalable and resilient malware detection systems.

Adversarial APKs are Android applications modified in the problem space to evade machine-learning malware detectors. In this work, we first show that, despite claims, existing problem-space attacks remain largely impractical. Most techniques leverage software transplantation to inject entire benign modules, introducing many side-effect features and often causing build-time failures. Fine-grained methods that inject only a narrow subset of components exhibit limited effectiveness, while those that also use obfuscation rely on brittle bytecode rewriting, producing APKs that are syntactically valid but semantically unusable. Prior work further overestimates attack success rates by running smoke tests that only validate installation and basic execution, without assessing whether the modified APK still preserves its intended behavior. To overcome these limitations, we present DROIDBREAKER, a practical (build-safe) and functional (semantics-preserving) problem-space attack framework that provides: (i) query-efficient white- and black-box attacks by manipulating only the APK components most influential to the target model; (ii) a set of fine-grained, build-safe manipulations (including injection and obfuscation of API calls, app modules, permissions, and URLs) with minimal side effects; and (iii) a semantics-preserving functionality test that enforces runtime equivalence by comparing execution logs and API-level traces between the initial and the modified APK. Evaluated on a recent corpus of Android applications, DROIDBREAKER achieves high evasion rates with few queries and minimal side effects in both white-box and black-box settings, and drastically reduces detections by commercial malware scanners hosted on VirusTotal.

Malware analysts often inspect compiled binaries through decompiled pseudo-C, when source code is unavailable. Recent work suggests that large language models (LLMs) can assist this process by classifying decompiled code as benign or malicious, but existing pipelines typically rely on a single decompiler view. We argue that this assumption is fragile: decompilers are lossy heuristic tools, and different decompilers can expose different artefacts of the same binary. We curate a benchmark of benign utilities and malicious programs spanning a range of threat behaviors. Each sample is compiled and decompiled with both Ghidra and RetDec, yielding matched pseudo-C views. Across a range of LLMs from major model families, we find that providing both decompiler views improves malicious-class F1, mainly by increasing recall on malicious samples. Agreement analyses further show that Ghidra and RetDec make partially different errors, supporting the view that decompiler outputs provide complementary evidence. Our results suggest that multi-decompiler prompting is a simple, training-free way to improve LLM-based malware triage in practical settings.

The growing reliance on pre-trained Machine Learning (ML) models has introduced new attack surfaces. Recent vulnerabilities demonstrate that malicious behavior can be embedded within model artifacts, often bypassing existing defenses. Current model-scanning solutions primarily rely on static, format-specific rules or known attack signatures, which limit their ability to generalize across frameworks and to detect novel exploitation paths. In contrast, we propose a solution that focuses on the effects an attack has on the host system executing the model and builds on foundational intuitions about ML model execution. In particular, we observe that ML models operate within well-defined lifecycle phases and that, within each phase, interactions with the host system are highly structured and predictable. We translate these intuitions into Moat, a dynamic lifecycle-aware approach for securing ML model execution, and instantiate this design in Re-Moat, our reference implementation. We evaluate Re-Moat across multiple ML frameworks using 77,974 real-world model artifacts from the Hugging Face Hub, 31 Proofs-of-Concept (PoCs) from CVEs, and 334 models from a state-of-the-art dataset, and compare it against state-of-the-art model-scanning solutions. Our results show that our approach detects all evaluated attack classes while maintaining a close-to-zero false-positive rate, validating our intuitions and motivating dynamic analysis for securing ML model execution.

Compared with binaries and decompiled code, malware source code more directly reflects the attackers' original intent. However, the scarcity of source code and the high cost of manual review make such datasets difficult to build and maintain. We propose MASCOT-Android, a curated dataset of Android malware source code and an automated collection framework for scalable malware source code discovery on GitHub. A key finding of our work is that repository-level documentation alone provides a strong signal for malware source code collection. Our model extracts character-level TF-IDF features from 8,772 malware and 25,747 benign README documents and trains a LinearSVC classifier to distinguish malware repositories. This README-only model achieves an accuracy of 96.28% and an FPR of 1.06% in local evaluation. In addition, the model outputs confidence scores, allowing users to adjust the decision threshold to balance FPR and coverage, which is practical in real-world malware source code collection.

Visualization-based malware detection maps raw binary bytes to grayscale images and applies learned visual classifiers, providing an evasion-resistant and disassembly-free alternative to conventional analysis pipelines. However, executable packing remains a critical failure mode: packed binaries produce high-entropy images that obscure the structural patterns these models rely on. Because packing is also prevalent in benign software (e.g., for compression or copy protection), packing state alone is not a reliable indicator of maliciousness, and existing approaches do not address this challenge within a unified supervised framework. We present ViPER, a Vision-based Packing-Aware Encoder for Robust malware detection. ViPER builds on a LoRA-adapted ViT-B/14 backbone with a dual-head architecture that jointly learns malware classification and packing detection. A packing-aware gating mechanism conditions malware predictions on the inferred packing state, enabling distinct decision boundaries for packed and unpacked inputs. To address packing label skew during training, we employ frequency-weighted losses with stratified sampling over joint class-packing strata. Evaluated on 200,000 Windows PE byteplot images, ViPER achieves a balanced accuracy of 0.8521, ROC-AUC of 0.9260, and AUPR of 0.9279, outperforming representative state-of-the-art baselines across all primary metrics, while attaining a packing detection AUC of 0.9949.

MOLOT (Malicious Operational Logic Observation Transformer) is a static malicious-code detection system designed for SAST setup where package metadata, maintainer history, and dynamic execution traces may be unavailable or unreliable. The system represents source code as behavior sequences derived from static call graphs, includes an explanation stage that ranks suspicious behavior activities and maps them back to source-code locations. The approach is evaluated on Python and JavaScript packages from PyPI and npm, compared with opensource detection tools, and validated under product constraints including runtime, memory use, and false-positive rates observed in a real moderation workflow. We also release Open Malicious-Code Bench, a public benchmark for reproducible evaluation of malicious-package detection methods. The results show that static behavior-sequence modeling can provide accurate, explainable, and deployable malicious-code detection for modern DevSecOps workflows.

As malware illustrates a complex structure and behavior, detection of these has been a significant challenge in the domain of cybersecurity along with related services in daily life. So, it becomes crucial to have a reliable and adaptive solution to address the issue. Among the several detection methods developed over the years, one of the most reliable ones is studying and analyzing the structural and behavioral patterns of malware. These patterns of sophisticated malware can be obtained with the help of Function Call Graphs (FCGs). However, to effectively cover numerous groups of families of malware, it is required to have a sufficiently large dataset for the system to operate on. In order to ensure accuracy and robustness of the system, the dataset should comprise samples of different malwares and a benign application for secure execution of the detection process. This paper introduces AMD-FCG, an enhanced Function Call Graph dataset integrated with topological features of malwares. The framework enhances the detection procedure, streamlining the workflow for cybersecurity professionals and also eliminating the need for dynamic analysis and extensive processing. Therefore, it can be used to develop and deploy more efficient and innovative malware detection systems.

File-type classification underlies many workflows like malware triage, forensic carving, packet inspection, and storage indexing. Learned systems such as Google's Magika assume whole-file access at a known offset, so they break on the inputs many of these tasks actually produce, like a single packet payload, a header-less carved fragment, a random disk block, or a chunked upload. We introduce MimeLens, a family of small BERT-style encoders pretrained on binary content from windows sampled at a uniformly random offset within each file, with no privileged head-of-file position, in standard- and short-context variants. A byte chunk goes in from anywhere in a file, no header needed and no fixed size; out comes one of libmagic's 125 MIME labels. On the clean head of complete files, MimeLens beats Magika v1.1 by +10.7 pp top-1 on libmagic-labeled data, and it keeps classifying where Magika cannot: from a single mid-stream UDP packet, and more than twice as accurately as libmagic and Magika on random mid-file disk blocks. The cost is latency: MimeLens runs roughly one to two orders of magnitude slower per sample on CPU than Magika, though it matches on consumer GPUs or in batch. All trained checkpoints are released on Hugging Face (mjbommar/mimelens-001-*).

Early attribution of Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) activity can help defenders prioritise investigation, select countermeasures, and reduce the impact of an intrusion. Malware provides useful attribution evidence, but automated APT malware attribution remains difficult in practice. Existing approaches are typically trained and evaluated as closed-set classifiers over a limited number of known APT groups. In operational environments, however, classifiers are likely to encounter samples from groups not represented during training. Closed-set classifiers are then forced to assign such samples to known groups, producing unsupported and potentially misleading attributions. We present a high-precision APT malware attribution method based on ranked binary classifiers with explicit abstention. Rather than training a single multi-class classifier, our approach trains and tunes two binary classifiers per APT group, ranks the classifiers by validation performance, and applies them sequentially. A sample is attributed only when a classifier provides sufficient evidence; otherwise, it abstains. We evaluate the method on the APT Malware dataset and on a larger combined dataset designed to stress-test out-of-scope behaviour. On the APT Malware dataset, the method achieves higher precision than previously published results on the same dataset. In the most challenging setting, where 87% of test samples came from 60 APT groups excluded from training, the method abstained on 94% of out-of-scope samples while maintaining 92% precision and 95% selective accuracy on the samples it classified.

The number of malware (either variant or novel) is rapidly increasing, making malware detection and mitigation a complex problem. One approach to improving malware mitigation is automatic detection and malware family classification. However, traditional malware detection methods cannot classify detected malware into their respective families, hindering effective malware mitigation. Consequently, this paper proposes a method to automate malware detection and classification of the detected malware into respective malware families. The proposed method uses feature fusion after extracting relevant malware features such as API calls and fixed and variable length n-grams with a customized feature selection method. Moreover, for the predictive model, a voting based approach is proposed for algorithm fusion. For the experimental evaluation of the proposed method, both binary and multi-class classification approaches are applied to the data set provided by Microsoft. Finally, the experimental results are compared with the state of the art. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach with an AUC of 0.989, accuracy of 99.72%, and a log loss of 0.01.

Malware analysis starts with the raw bytes of an executable program, and tools to "lift" these to higher-level representations, such as assembly, are expensive and subject to error. Large Language Models (LLMs) cannot process raw byte representations and answer questions about them. To this end, we present the first byte-native LLM. Based on a vocabulary expansion technique using a bespoke byte tokenizer, such a model is capable of responding to complex questions about malware binaries, with accuracies ranging from 69% for malware family classification to 98% for architecture classification. Our findings indicate that providing domain knowledge during training is essential for this application -- off-the-shelf models lack both accuracy and insight. We've deployed this emerging solution to a limited number of analysts to gather feedback for further improvements.

We present a dataset of adversarial malware samples derived from the public RawMal-TF collection of real-world malware binaries. Using a suite of adversarial malware generators, we construct two sets of adversarial PE files: 44,347 family-labelled samples and 33,596 type-labelled samples, achieving evasion rates of 98.35 % and 92.20 % against the EMBER classifier, respectively. Each adversarial binary is accompanied by detailed metadata, including EMBER scores and VirusTotal classifications. We further demonstrate the susceptibility of malware classification pipelines to data poisoning attacks through a series of training experiments. Injecting fully mislabelled adversarial samples representing only 0.5 % of the training data in the family-labelled dataset increases the evasion rate against the re-trained classifier from 26.1 % to 92.8 %. The dataset is publicly released to facilitate future research on adversarial malware, poisoning attacks, and the robustness of machine-learning-based malware detection systems.

Machine learning based malware detectors become obsolete over time due to concept drift in benign and malware applications. Recent methods rely on fully labeled data and use hierarchical contrastive loss (HCL) with active learning to improve robustness against drift by exploiting semantic structure in malware representations. However, obtaining labeled data in the security domain is difficult. Under partially labeled settings, HCL suffers significant performance degradation in detecting unseen malware, especially on datasets such as BODMAS where strong semantic structure may not exist. In this paper, we propose SEED, a semantic-structure-agnostic method for malware detection under limited supervision. SEED combines a tailored binary cross-entropy objective with semi-supervised continual learning and active learning. For partially labeled seen tasks, unlabeled samples are projected into a representation space constructed from previously seen data using singular value decomposition, and paired with suitable labeled samples to encourage representation consistency. For unseen tasks with fully unlabeled data, uncertainty is quantified using cosine distance in representation space, and the most uncertain samples are selected for analyst labeling. We evaluate SEED on both Windows and Android malware datasets. Using only 20% labeled data on seen tasks, SEED achieves average AUT improvements of 40% on BODMAS and 14% on AndroZoo for unseen malware detection compared to HCL* (the semi-supervised adaptation of HCL), while remaining competitive on APIGraph. Finally, we introduce a delayed buffer update strategy to reduce label noise propagation during replay and improve learning stability.

Machine learning-based malware detectors are widely deployed in antivirus and endpoint detection systems, yet their reliance on static features makes them vulnerable to adversarial manipulation. This paper investigates whether a malware sample can be intentionally misclassified as a specific benign software category, not merely as "not malware", by adding a small number of Win32 API imports characteristic of that selected category, without removing any existing imports or retraining the detector. We propose a framework centered on a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) whose decoder is strictly additive. It can introduce new API calls but never remove existing ones, preserving malware functionality by design. For each malware sample, the framework automatically identifies which benign category it most closely resembles and uses that as the evasion target. A knowledge-distilled differentiable proxy enables gradient-based training against the non-differentiable ensemble detector. Experiments on a six-class dataset of binary Win32 API import vectors extracted from 3,799 Windows executables (five benign categories, one malware class) show that, against a detector achieving 87.5% malware recall, adding just 20 API imports reduces recall to 30%. At k=20, among samples that evaded detection, 99% are classified as the intended target category. The CVAE outperforms both a frequency-based baseline and random selection at every tested injection size (k = 5 to 50). Validation on real PE files submitted to VirusTotal confirms that the attack transfers to commercial static detection engines, with an average 54.5% reduction in flagging engines. These findings expose a concrete vulnerability in API-based malware classifiers and demonstrate that targeted evasion into a chosen benign category is achievable with minimal, functionality-preserving modifications.

Binary function classifiers play a crucial role in maintaining the security and integrity of software systems by detecting malicious code and unauthorized modifications. However, machine learning-based classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can evade detection. In this study, we present Kelpie, a novel framework for executing mimicry attacks, a stronger type of targeted evasion attacks, on binary function classifiers in a black-box, zero-query setting. Unlike previous approaches that rely on querying the target classifier to refine untargeted evasion attacks, Kelpie leverages code transformations that preserve the functionality of malicious payloads while causing them to be misclassified as we want. Through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate that Kelpie can successfully execute mimicry attacks against six state-of-the-art binary function classifiers representing different model architectures without requiring direct interaction with them. We further validate our approach with a practical demonstration, involving a keylogger and a wiper concealed within benign-looking functions embedded in an application. This work, to our best knowledge, is the first to demonstrate such a mimicry attack in a black-box, zero-query context, raising important questions about the reliability and security of existing machine learning-based binary function classifiers.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely adopted today for its ability to detect patterns, automate tasks, and reduce time and cost across various applications. Its integration into Cybersecurity has garnered significant attention, particularly in areas such as intrusion detection, malware analysis, and phishing or spam detection. As AI and cybersecurity evolve, new methods and approaches emerge regularly. Current trends include the use of Generative AI, Natural Language Processing, Federated Learning for privacy-preserving collaborative training, and eXplainable AI to ensure interpretability and trust, which are vital in cybersecurity. This paper presents an interesting review of current AI-based cybersecurity trends, focusing on intrusion detection approaches and aiming to uncover meaningful insights through comparative analysis based on the employed AI techniques and reported performance.

As over 200 million new malware samples are identified each year, antivirus systems must continuously adapt to the evolving threat landscape. However, retraining solely on new samples leads to catastrophic forgetting and exploitable blind spots, while retraining on the entire dataset incurs substantial computational cost. We propose FreeMOCA, a memory- and compute-efficient continual learning framework for malicious code analysis that preserves prior knowledge via adaptive layer-wise interpolation between consecutive task updates, leveraging the fact that warm-started task optima are connected by low-loss paths in parameter space. We evaluate FreeMOCA in both class-incremental (Class-IL) and domain-incremental (Domain-IL) settings on large-scale Windows (EMBER) and Android (AZ) malware benchmarks. FreeMOCA achieves substantial gains in Class-IL, outperforming 11 baselines on both EMBER and AZ benchmarks. It also significantly reduces forgetting, achieving the best retention across baselines, and improving accuracy by up to 42% and 37% on EMBER and AZ, respectively. These results demonstrate that warm-started interpolation in parameter space provides a scalable and effective alternative to replay for continual malware detection. Code is available at: https://github.com/IQSeC-Lab/FreeMOCA.

Machine learning-based Android malware detectors often fail in real-world deployment due to domain shift, where models trained on one data source perform poorly on applications from another. This paper presents a comprehensive study on the generalizability and interpretability of permission-based detectors under cross-domain conditions. Using two complementary datasets (PerMalDroid and NATICUSdroid) and five ensemble classifiers, we first establish an intra-domain baseline, where models achieve over 92% accuracy, and then quantify a severe asymmetric performance drop. While models trained on PerMalDroid generalize well to NATICUSdroid (86% accuracy), the reverse direction sees a drastic drop to 73% accuracy. Explainable AI analysis reveals bimodal feature distributions and shows that feature importance is highly unstable, with key permissions losing or gaining influence across domains. The predictive feature sets for different domains are fundamentally mismatched, as models rely on different, dataset-specific permissions. Most importantly, an ablation study demonstrates that for most models, training on a noisy feature set leads to poor generalization, confirming that domain-specific artifacts are a greater obstacle than missing features. To mitigate this, we validate a hybrid training strategy based on the intersection of common features and successfully recover cross-domain performance, achieving 88% accuracy on PerMalDroid and maintaining 97% on NATICUSdroid. These findings highlight the importance of explainable, cross-domain-robust malware detection systems and provide a practical pathway toward improving real-world deployment of permission-based Android malware detectors.

Modern cybersecurity relies heavily on static machine-learning-based malware classifiers. However, transformations such as packing and other non-semantic modifications applied to executable files limit their reliability. Malware classifiers often learn these unnecessary artifacts rather than the true binary behavior because of the high association between maliciousness and packing. Moreover, these malware classifiers are black boxes, making it difficult to understand what they learn. To address this issue, we proposed a two-part framework using the post-hoc interpretability XAI tool TRUSTEE, followed by a manual analysis of the top features. We conducted several controlled experiments by varying the dataset composition ratios to understand their impact on the results. The top-ranked features across all experiments, identified by TRUSTEE, were predominantly packing artifacts, portable executable(PE) metadata, and n-grams at the string level, rather than malicious semantics. These results suggest that these malware classifiers are highly sensitive to dataset composition and can misinterpret packing as malicious behavior. Our proposed framework allows for the reproducible diagnosis of such biases and forms a guideline for building more robust and semantically meaningful malware detection models

LLMs are increasingly explored for malware analysis; however, current LLM-based malware attribution remains limited by unsupported indicators and insufficient code-level grounding for identifying malicious and vulnerable code segments. To address these limitations, this research introduces LCC-LLM, a code-centric benchmark dataset and evidence-grounded framework for malware attribution and multi-task static malware analysis. The proposed LCCD dataset contains approximately 34K PE samples processed through a large-scale reverse-engineering pipeline and represented using decompiled C code, assembly code, CFG/FCG artifacts, hexadecimal data, PE metadata, suspicious API evidence, and structural features. Beyond dataset construction, LCC-LLM integrates LangGraph-orchestrated static analysis with multi-source cybersecurity knowledge to support evidence-grounded malware reasoning. The framework employs a seven-layer retrieval-augmented generation pipeline, CoVe for IoC validation, and a multi-dimensional quality gate to improve factual reliability and analyst-oriented decision support. Curriculum-ordered instruction data is used to fine-tune DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B using QLoRA. Evaluation across 43 malware-analysis task types achieves an average semantic similarity of 0.634, with the highest task-level performance in structured report generation, IoC extraction, vulnerability assessment, malware configuration extraction, and malware class detection. In a real-world case study using MalwareBazaar samples, the grounded pipeline achieves a 10/10 structured analysis pass rate, producing CFG/FCG evidence, MITRE ATT&CK mappings, detection guidance, and analyst-ready reports. These results show that code-centric representations, retrieval grounding, and verification-guided reasoning improve the reliability and operational usefulness of LLM-assisted malware attribution.

Malware and malware-based attacks are becoming more prevalent and complex. Attackers regularly come up with new techniques that have the ability to evade conventional and signature-based malware defense. In order to address such threats, there is an increasing demand for advanced and better defense solutions. Machine learning-based techniques are efficiently capable of defending against malware and malware-based attacks. Nevertheless, creating and efficiently testing such techniques demand high-quality datasets having samples of various malware families as well as goodware. The lack of such datasets continues to be a major bottleneck in malware research. In this paper, we introduce TUANDROMD-X, a multiclass malware dataset with visual and entropy-based features of each sample, distinctly identifying malware from goodware. The dataset is created based on static analysis, lowering the overhead that comes with high feature engineering and dynamic analysis. As a result, TUANDROMD-X facilitates researchers and cyber-security experts to design faster and better malware detection systems.

Modern malware detection pipelines rely on continuous data ingestion and machine learning to counter the high volume of novel threats. This work investigates a realistic gray-box poisoning threat model targeting these pipelines. Using the secml_malware framework, we generate problem-space adversarial binaries through functionality-preserving manipulations, specifically Import Address Table (IAT) and section injections. We evaluate the impact of these poisoned samples when ingested into a defender's training set for a LightGBM malware detection model. Our empirical results demonstrate that subtle IAT-based perturbations enable compact poisoning samples that significantly degrade detection recall. These findings illustrate the inherent challenge of developing low-visibility adversarial perturbations that maintain high poisoning efficacy within continuous learning systems. We further evaluate a defense mechanism based on a homogeneous ensemble, which successfully identifies and filters up to 95.6% of poisoning attempts while maintaining a high retention rate for legitimate data. These findings emphasize the necessity of robust pre-ingestion validation in production pipelines.

Traditionally, machine learning methods for PE malware detection have relied on static features like byte histograms, string information, and PE header contents. One barrier to incorporating dynamic analysis features has been the semi-structured nature of sandbox behavior reports. We show that, using the latest generation of large language models with reasoning, it is possible to efficiently process these behavior reports and utilize them as part of a malware detection pipeline. Specifically, we leverage LLMs to generate behavior-based malware detection rules based on a small training set of labeled malware. We find that these detection rules, derived from behavioral features, are much more robust to concept drift than standard static-feature methods, while maintaining practical false positive rates. Finally, we introduce Trident, a system which combines a classic decision tree model over static features, our behavior-based detection rules, and direct LLM analysis of sandbox reports through majority voting. Trident outperforms standard methods using static features, outperforms behavior-based rules alone, and is as resilient to concept drift as active learning methods without requiring retraining.

The security of open-source software repositories is increasingly threatened by next-gen software supply chain attacks. These attacks include multiphase malware execution, remote access activation, and dynamic payload generation. Traditional Machine Learning (ML) detectors struggle to detect these attacks due to the high-dimensional and sparse nature of dynamic behavioral data, including system calls, network traffic, directory access patterns, and dependency logs. As a result, these data characteristics degrade the performance, stability, and explainability of ML models. These challenges have made Deep Learning (DL) a promising alternative, given its success across various domains and its potential for modeling complex patterns. This paper presents eDySec, a DL-based efficient, stable, and explainable framework for dynamic behavioral analysis to detect malicious packages. Using the QUT-DV25 dataset, which captures both install-time and post-installation behaviors of packages, we evaluate DL models and investigate feature sets to identify the most discriminative attributes for enabling efficient malicious package detection. Additionally, model stability analysis and explainable AI techniques are incorporated into the detection pipeline to enable stable, and transparent interpretations of model decisions. Experimental results demonstrate that eDySec significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art frameworks. Specifically, it halves feature dimensionality while lowering false positives by 82% and false negatives by 79%. It also improves accuracy by 3%, achieves near-perfect stability, and maintains an inference latency of 170ms per package. Further analysis reveals that feature and model selection play a critical role, as certain combinations degrade performance. Ultimately, this study advances the understanding of the strengths and limitations of dynamic analysis against next-gen attacks.

Rootkits are among the most elusive types of malware, capable of bypassing traditional static analysis methods due to their metamorphic behavior. Signature-based detection techniques struggle against these threats, necessitating a shift toward dynamic analysis approaches. We propose SeqShield, a behavior-based rootkit detection approach designed specifically for the Windows OS, leveraging API call sequences for dynamic behavior analysis. Instead of relying on static signatures, SeqShield examines the execution patterns of API calls, which inherently reflect malicious intent. Analyzing API sequences, we can effectively identify rootkit-like behavior. We also employed a metamorphic code engine to generate 10X mutated variants of rootkits, demonstrating their obfuscation strategies. SeqShield applies n-gram analysis to extract bigram and trigram features from these API call sequences, enabling effective detection of rootkit-like activity. Among the models tested, Random Forest achieves the highest accuracy of 97.27% (bigram) and 96.17% (trigram). To optimize performance and decrease the dimension, we apply feature importance ranking using the Gini Impurity Index, iteratively selecting the most significant features. The optimized lower-dimensional feature matrix significantly enhances detection efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. Using the optimized feature set, our approach achieves 96.72% accuracy for bigrams and 97.81% accuracy for trigrams.

Android malware detectors built with machine learning often suffer from temporal bias: models are trained and evaluated without respecting apps' actual release times, inflating accuracy and weakening real-world robustness. We address this by constructing a time-stamped dataset of benign and malicious Android apps and introducing a timestamp-verification procedure to ensure temporal accuracy. We then propose a detection framework that uses Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) for self-supervised pre-training to learn obfuscation-resilient representations, followed by supervised classification. Under time-aware evaluation, the method attains 98% accuracy and 89% F1. We further characterize malware behavior by analyzing true positives and false negatives using VirusTotal and the MITRE ATT&CK framework. To support reproducibility and further innovation, we release our dataset and source code.

Machine learning-based malware detectors are increasingly vulnerable to adversarial examples. Traditional defenses, such as one-shot adversarial training, often fail against adaptive attackers who use reinforcement learning to bypass detection. This paper proposes a robust defense framework based on bilevel optimization, explicitly modeling the strategic interaction between a defender and an attacker as an adversarial co-evolutionary process. We evaluate our approach using the MAB-malware framework against three distinct malware families: Mokes, Strab, and DCRat. Our experimental results demonstrate that while standard classifiers and basic adversarial retraining often remain vulnerable, showing evasion rates as high as 90 %, the proposed bilevel optimization approach consistently achieves near-total immunity, reducing evasion rates to 0 - 1.89 %. Furthermore, the iterative framework significantly increases the attacker's query complexity, raising the average cost of successful evasion by up to two orders of magnitude. These findings suggest that modeling the iterative cycle of attack and defense through bilevel optimization is essential for developing resilient malware detection systems capable of withstanding evolving adversarial threats.

Malware attacks have a significant negative impact on organizations of varied scales in the field of cybersecurity. Recently, malware researchers have increasingly turned to machine learning techniques to combat sophisticated obfuscation methods used in malware. However, collecting a diverse set of malware samples with various obfuscation techniques is challenging and often takes years, especially for newly developed malware. This issue is further compounded by a well-known limitation of machine learning models: their poor performance when training data is scarce. In this paper, we propose a new system for generating synthetic malware samples to augment imbalanced malware dataset. Our approach decomposes malware binary samples into mnemonic opcode sequences, leveraging natural language processing to extract contextual meaning behind malware opcode features to aid the learning of generative AI (GenAI) employed in this paper, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP), and a modified Diffusion model. The experiment results show that augmenting training data with Diffusion-based synthetic data significantly improves classification performance for minor classes by up to 60% on average. This enhancement ultimately leads to an overall malware classification performance of 96%, an 8% improvement. These findings demonstrate the high quality and fidelity of the synthetic data, its robustness, and its potential applications in malware analysis. Specifically, synthetic malware data proves effective in improving the classification of minor malware classes and detection rates, even though the size of known malware data is significantly small.

Deep learning has emerged as a powerful approach for malware detection, demonstrating impressive accuracy across various data representations. However, these models face critical limitations in real-world, non-stationary environments where both malware characteristics and detection systems continuously evolve. Our research investigates a fundamental security question: Can an attacker generate adversarial malware samples that simultaneously evade classification and remain inconspicuous to drift monitoring mechanisms? We propose a novel approach that generates targeted adversarial examples in the classifier's standardized feature space, augmented with sophisticated similarity regularizers. By carefully constraining perturbations to maintain distributional similarity with clean malware, we create an optimization objective that balances targeted misclassification with drift signal minimization. We quantify the effectiveness of this approach by comprehensively comparing classifier output probabilities using multiple drift metrics. Our experiments demonstrate that similarity constraints can reduce output drift signals, with $\ell_2$ regularization showing the most promising results. We observe that perturbation budget significantly influences the evasion-detectability trade-off, with increased budget leading to higher attack success rates and more substantial drift indicators.

Machine learning-based static malware detectors remain vulnerable to adversarial evasion techniques, such as metamorphic engine mutations. To address this vulnerability, we propose a certifiably robust malware detection framework based on randomized smoothing through feature ablation and targeted noise injection. During evaluation, our system analyzes an executable by generating multiple ablated variants, classifies them by using a smoothed classifier, and identifies the final label based on the majority vote. By analyzing the top-class voting distribution and the Wilson score interval, we derive a formal certificate that guarantees robustness within a specific radius against feature-space perturbations. We evaluate our approach by comparing the performance of the base classifier and the smoothed classifier on both clean executables and ablated variants generated using PyMetaEngine. Our results demonstrate that the proposed smoothed classifier successfully provides certifiable robustness against metamorphic evasion attacks without requiring modifications to the underlying machine learning architecture.

Machine Learning (ML) pipelines encode quality-relevant decisions across data preparation, training, evaluation, and configuration code. Some recurring source-level quality problems in these pipelines, known as ML code smells, may not cause immediate failures but can harm reproducibility, robustness, efficiency, or maintainability. Detecting ML code smell occurrences is challenging because the decisive evidence is often non-local, spanning helper functions, wrappers, imports, control-flow, and data-flow relations. We present SpecDetect4ML, a static analyser that operationalises 22 ML code smells using CPG views with project-level resolution. We evaluate it on 890 Python ML-based systems comprising more than 20M LOC and a system-level recall benchmark over the complete ML-relevant source subset of 10 selected systems. Under identical ML code smell specifications, CPG-based reasoning raises recall from 68.62% to 88.14% compared with AST-only analysis, while keeping CPG precision comparable at 90.32%. These results show that project-level static reasoning expands the detectable portion of non-local ML code smell occurrences, while configuration-dependent and runtime-only occurrences remain outside our source-only static claims.

While graph-based Android malware classifiers report strong benchmark accuracy of over 94%, their performance sharply decreases up to 45% when exposed to previously unseen variants of known malware families. In this work, we systematically investigate this critical yet overlooked challenge for real-world deployment by introducing a benchmarking suite designed to simulate two prevalent scenarios: MalNet-Tiny-Common for covariate shift, and MalNet-Tiny-Distinct for domain shift. We further identify an inherent limitation of existing benchmarks where input representation is limited to structure-only function call graphs, discarding the semantic signals needed for robust cross-distribution reasoning. To verify this, we propose a semantic enrichment framework that extends raw graph topology with function-level attributes, combining lightweight metadata with LLM-based code embeddings. Empirical evaluations confirm the effectiveness of our data-centric methodology, with which classification performs better under distribution shift compared to model-based approaches, and consistently further enhances robustness when used in conjunction. We release our precomputed datasets alongside an extensible pipeline implementation, laying the groundwork for more resilient malware detection systems in evolving threat environments.

Machine Learning (ML) malware detectors rely heavily on crowd-sourced AntiVirus (AV) labels, with platforms like VirusTotal serving as trusted sources of malware annotations. But what if attackers could manipulate these labels to classify benign software as malicious? We introduce label spoofing attacks, a new threat that contaminates crowd-sourced datasets by embedding minimal and undetectable malicious patterns into benign samples. These patterns coerce AV engines into misclassifying legitimate files as harmful, enabling poisoning attacks against ML-based malware classifiers trained on those data. We demonstrate this scenario by developing AndroVenom, a methodology for polluting realistic data sources and launching subsequent poisoning attacks against ML malware detectors. Experiments show that not only are state-of-the-art feature extractors unable to filter such injections, but various ML models experience Denial-of-Service (DoS) with as little as 1% poisoned samples. Additionally, attackers can flip decisions for specific unaltered benign samples by modifying only 0.015% of the training data, threatening their reputation and market share, while evading anomaly detectors operating on the training data. We conclude by raising concerns about the trustworthiness of ML training processes based on AV annotations and argue that further investigation is needed to develop more reliable labeling strategies.