Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

2 papers in the last four weeks, against 1 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Jul 6Week of Sep 21

Latest papers 16

Sep 30, 2026cs.CV

Video Evidence Indexing: Learning Where to Look from Video Previews for Token-Budgeted Long-Video Question Answering

Long-video question answering is limited by the high cost of visual tokens and by the fixed context width of current VLMs. A long-video question may require broad temporal coverage, but the answer is often supported by only a compact set of moments. To locate these moments efficiently, we propose token-budgeted Video Evidence Indexing (VEI): given a dense low-resolution Video Preview, the model constructs a compact high-resolution Evidence Set for final reasoning. We treat VEI as a policy that must jointly solve \textit{evidence localization}, which finds question-relevant moments, and \textit{budget planning}, which decides where to spend the limited high-resolution frame budget. We implement this idea with an inference pipeline: the Video Preview provides cheap global coverage, Video Evidence Indexing constructs the Evidence Set, and Answer Generation combines both inputs for final VQA. To address missing frame-level supervision, we adopt privileged self-distillation, where an answer-aware teacher guides the normal test-time policy on student-generated indexing traces. We explore previews at 1, 6, 12, and 24 visual tokens per frame, training a single policy that supports all four resolutions. Experiments show that Video Evidence Indexing improves accuracy under limited visual budgets, and self-distillation further improves both QA accuracy and temporal evidence localization.

Haowen Guan, Shengzhi Li, Shichao Pei

Long Video Question Answering Video Understanding Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering

Sep 21, 2026cs.CV

Spatial Action Review: A Visual Analytics Dashboard for Auditing Language-to-Action Hand-offs in Electron Microscopy

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly explored as interfaces for scientific image analysis, where a visual question-answering (VQA) response may be paired with a spatial output that guides a downstream stage. A supervisor reads the language answer, while a downstream workflow such as segmentation or region review consumes the point-set output. We call this transition from inspecting the answer to relying on its point action the language-to-action hand-off. A silent failure occurs when the answer is correct while the paired action misses annotated objects needed downstream, so answer-based oversight clears a region whose action is unreliable. We introduce Spatial Action Review, a visual analytics dashboard for auditing this failure mode in electron microscopy (EM) mitochondria analysis. It links paired answer-action records through an answer-action ledger, a task-by-dataset risk map, and an image-region audit view, connecting aggregate patterns to image evidence while an adjustable action-reliability gate supports re-audit. The review ends in a human-AI hand-off, where a supervisor records whether the action is accepted, escalated, held under a stricter gate, or flagged for model revision. Across 541 image regions from an EM-adapted Qwen3-VL case-study run, point actions fail the gate in 54.4% of records with a correct VQA response, and 27.4% of all records are silent failures. A correct answer is associated with only a 5.8-percentage-point higher probability of a reliable action, with a bootstrap interval spanning zero; the point-biserial correlation between answer correctness and object coverage is 0.061. This weak coupling persists across five model conditions on 753 matched image regions. Spatial Action Review makes answer-action mismatches visible and ties them to image evidence and a recorded decision before MLLM outputs enter autonomous scientific workflows.

Samia Mohinta, Albert Cardona

University of Cambridge, UK · MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, UK

Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Electron Microscopy Multimodal Large Language Models Visual Analytics Model Auditing Review

Sep 3, 2026cs.CV

When Do Frozen VLMs Respond to Image-Free Object-Token Edits? An Answer-Key-Free Protocol and What It Reveals

Answering what-if queries about a scene with a VLM usually means injecting the assumption as text or repainting the scene with a generative model. We instead move the edit to the representation level, before the model input. The image is abstracted into a set of object-level tokens, and the original image never enters the VLM. This design rests on an open question: when do frozen VLMs actually respond to such token edits? We introduce an answer-key-free protocol: no post-edit answer is annotated. It scores edits whose answers are logically determined, and audits itself by reversing each scoreable choice. The protocol reveals three structures. The response is not free: explicit edit teaching, not ordinary VQA training, produces it in dense scenes and multiplies it in sparse ones, on all three operations. Once on, it is governed by token cleanliness and density, with deployable detector+segmenter tokens competitive with the oracle and outperforming it on VRSBench. And reading is a separable axis: the image-free token route preserves 92-96% of a matched patch-token baseline's free-text VQA, and the answers measurably depend on the tokens. The response, cleanliness, and reading structures are sign-preserved across two remote-sensing datasets (iSAID, VRSBench) and three frozen LM backbones. We release the probe generator, records, judge logs, and code.

Wonbin Son, Gyumun Choi, Junil Seo +3

Changwon National University · Chung-Ang University

Frozen Vision-Language Models Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Answer Remote Sensing Protocol Generative Models

Aug 13, 2026cs.AI

Polish Medical Visual Question Answering: Vision-Language Models Underutilize Visual Evidence

We introduce a Polish-language medical visual question answering (VQA) benchmark, built from Polish Board Certification Examination questions for licensed physicians and dentists pursuing specialist certification. The benchmark comprises image-containing questions spanning diverse medical specialties and visual domains, together with a text-only question answering (QA) control set. We evaluate Polish-oriented, general-purpose open-weight, and commercial vision-language models. The task remains challenging: the best model achieves 79.0% accuracy on the full VQA set, and only GPT-5.6 surpasses the approximate human reference on the subset with available candidate responses; all other evaluated models perform worse than humans. To assess visual grounding, we compare complete inputs with configurations omitting the image, the question, or both, and categorize questions by image importance. Models derive more useful information from the question text than from the image and perform worse on image-dominant questions. Across both QA and VQA, they nevertheless achieve above-chance accuracy from the answer choices alone, showing that non-trivial performance can persist even when key task components are missing.

Jakub Pokrywka, Łukasz Grzybowski, Antoni Lasik +3

Adam Mickiewicz University · ARAAI Poland · NASK National Research Institute +2

Medical Visual Question Answering Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Vision-Language Foundation Models Visual Evidence Diagnostic Benchmark Assessment

Jul 30, 2026cs.CV

Witness Evidence Portfolios: Single-Prefill Risk Detection for Closed Multimodal Answers

Reliable deployment of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) requires deciding whether a confident visual answer should be trusted, reviewed, or routed to a stronger system. Confidence scores capture candidate margins, but not where the estimated signed visual readouts associated with those margins come from or how they are distributed. We study inference-time risk detection for closed visual answers using the same white-box prefill path that produces the answer. Witness Evidence Portfolios (WEP) first estimates, layer by layer, which visual contributions support or contradict the predicted candidate. It summarizes these contributions through two interpretable route families: question-related evidence provenance and signed evidence concentration. Nested grouped validation chooses the more reliable family and a sparse top-k route portfolio, which is fused with candidate confidence. WEP needs no image perturbation, decoding change, backward pass, or external verifier. Across three MLLMs and four binary-answer benchmarks, WEP improves mean error AP by 0.134. All 12 model--dataset gains are positive, and image-cluster bootstrap intervals are strictly positive on 10 pairs. WEP targets white-box closed-answer systems and uses a labeled calibration slice.

Fexiang Liu, Shiye Wang, Qiang Qiu +1

1State Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, CAS · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Reference-Guided Multimodal In-Context Verification Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Witnesses Multimodal Query Multimodal Large Language Models

Jul 17, 2026cs.CV

More with Less: a Large Scale Remote Sensing VLM with a Simple Recipe

Remote sensing vision-language models are increasingly expected to support open-ended reasoning over Earth Observation data and a variety of tasks. Most recent progress in this area has been driven by remote-sensing-specific architectural designs, often introducing new encoders, alignment modules, or task-specific fusion mechanisms. In this work, we challenge the necessity of such architectural specialization. We show that a generally capable vision-language model can achieve competitive or state-of-the-art performance at challenging remote sensing benchmarks, provided that it is trained at sufficient scale across diverse data and tasks. Our model uses a single language policy that can either answer directly in text or invoke a localization tool for segmentation and grounding. To train this heterogeneous behaviour, we employ a multi-task reinforcement learning framework with adaptive task rewards covering multiple-choice VQA, free-form VQA, captioning, detection, and segmentation across a large variety of input types. Our approach achieves competitive results across a broad set of benchmarks, including high-resolution, multi-temporal, multi-modal and multi-view tasks. Further, as training data scales, our experiments show consistent improvements across most tasks both in and out of distribution, which correlate with per-task data diversity. These findings suggest that, for remote sensing VLMs, data scale is sufficient even without architectural novelty.

Stefan Maria Ailuro, Mario Markov, Mohammad Mahdi +2

INSAIT, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"

Remote Sensing Recent Vision-Language Models Earth Observation Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning Recipe

Jul 11, 2026cs.CV

What Does Your Short-Answer VQA Score Actually Measure? Evaluator-Dependent Instability in Multimodal Short-Answer Benchmarks

Short-answer VQA benchmarks conflate two distinct quantities: whether a model's answer is semantically correct, and whether that answer matches the surface form expected by the automatic evaluator. We study this conflation across six vision--language models and six benchmarks, using a human-validated semantic judge (97.6% precision) to audit over 37k official errors. A second text-only judge reproduces the same benchmark-level false-negative pattern, showing that the effect is not an artifact of a single audit model. On text-rich benchmarks, up to half of these errors are semantically acceptable answers penalized purely for surface-form mismatch. This instability is structured by answer type: extractive and multi-span answers are far more evaluator-sensitive than scalar answers. Benign prompt and context rewrites further destabilize official outcomes, flipping item-level correctness at substantial rates without changing the underlying task. A deterministic CPU-only contract repair confirms that the undercount is partially recoverable. These findings imply that official short-answer VQA scores should be accompanied by semantic audits and answer-type diagnostics to remain interpretable.

Guanhua Ye, Niu Jingbin, Yan Li +4

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Beijing, China

Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Answer Large Language Model Judges Multimodal Benchmarks Scores Diagnosis

Jul 4, 2026cs.CV

Q-TriM: Question-Guided Tri-Modal Attention for Audio-Visual Question Answering

Audio-Visual Question Answering (AVQA) extends classical VQA by requiring joint reasoning over video and synchronized audio. However, many AVQA systems rely on deeply stacked layers of self- and cross attention across text, video, and audio. Such sequential stacking may incur loss of information such as subtle inter-modal cues over the layers, causing errors to accumulate across sequential attention layers during the fusion. We introduce Q-TriM which performs multi-modal fusion in a shallow and parallel manner instead of a deep and sequential manner. For Q-TriM, we propose a novel framework for attention operation incorporating video and audio conditioned on text. As a result, we obtain not only standard cross attention outputs but also Tri-Modal Attention representations in which Query, Key, and Value come from distinct modalities. These attention representations are combined in parallel at a single stage, thus avoiding the multi-modal fusion with deep stacks in order to mitigate error accumulation and depth-induced issues. Q-TriM achieves state-of-the-art performance on three AVQA benchmarks, including substantial gains on MUSIC-AVQA-R, which demonstrates its robustness and out-of-distribution generalization. Code is available at https://github.com/Sunghun95/Q-TriM

SungHun Kim, SeungJun Baek

Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering Korea University Seoul, South Korea

Audio-Visual Reasoning Cross-Modal Attention Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering

Jun 25, 2026cs.CV

CORTEX: A Structured Reasoning Benchmark for Trustworthy 3D Chest CT MLLMs

Reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has shown strong promise in medical imaging. However, this reasoning is usually free-form text judged only by its final answer, making it hard to interpret and verify, especially in 3D radiology, where a diagnosis should be traceable to evidence in the scan. Existing chest CT question-answering datasets compound this by reducing expert radiology reports to answer-only pairs, dropping the reasoning that links findings to conclusions and omitting the patient history clinicians rely on. As a result, reasoning-capable 3D chest CT MLLMs remain out of reach, as neither the structured supervision needed to train them nor the protocol needed to verify their reasoning yet exists. We introduce CORTEX (Clinically Organized Reasoning and sTructured EXplanation), a structured reasoning benchmark for 3D chest CT. For each question, CORTEX restores the missing reasoning as a four-stage diagnostic trace mirroring a radiologist's workflow: task understanding, visual observation, diagnostic reasoning, and answer synthesis. We generate these traces using frontier large language models with broad medical and general-domain knowledge, then filter and verify them with a stage-level evaluation protocol combining automated rubric scoring with expert radiologist review. Crucially, both the reasoning structure and evaluation rubrics are designed in close collaboration with clinicians. Built on CT-RATE, a large, publicly available chest CT dataset without reasoning annotations, CORTEX comprises 76,177 validated reasoning traces across open-ended VQA, closed-ended VQA, and report generation, providing both the structured supervision and the stage-level evaluation protocol needed to build and evaluate trustworthy reasoning models for 3D chest CT. Our dataset and evaluation code is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/aneesurhashmi/cortex

Hashmat Shadab Malik, Anees Ur Rehman Hashmi, Numan Saeed +3

MBZUAI, Abu Dhabi, UAE · Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, Germany · Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Clinical Reasoning Training Radiology Report Generation Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Reasoning Benchmark Multimodal Large Language Models Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering

Jun 24, 2026cs.CV

Multilingual Hematology Visual Question Answering Dataset

Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown promising capabilities in medical image analysis by jointly understanding visual and textual information for tasks such as Visual Question Answering. However, existing hematology vision-language resources remain predominantly English centric, limiting their applicability in multilingual healthcare environments. This challenge is releveant generally to South Asia and specifically to Pakistan, where Urdu is widely used despite healthcare information and digital medical systems being largely dependent on English. To investigate this gap, we conducted a survey among healthcare professionals, which revealed substantial language mismatches between clinical documentation and patient communication, emphasizing the need for multilingual healthcare technologies. To address this limitation, we introduce WBCMor VQA, a clinically validated bilingual English, Urdu morphology aware VQA benchmark for leukemia and normal white blood cell analysis. The benchmark is constructed using morphology-aware annotations from LeukemiaAttri and WBCAtt datasets and supported by a domain specific Urdu hematology dictionary to ensure linguistic consistency and clinical correctness. The final benchmark contains 110K bilingual question answer pairs serving as VQA annotations for 20K leukemic and normal single-cell images. Furthermore, we establish baseline performance by evaluating multiple open-source VLMs on the proposed benchmark. The proposed resource aims to facilitate the development of accessible and clinically relevant AI systems for multilingual healthcare environments.

Hajra Malik, Hafiza Tooba Aftab, Abdul Rehman +2

Information Technology University, Lahore · King Edward Medical University, Lahore

Multilingual Healthcare Q&A Urdu Multilingual Benchmark Acute Myeloid Leukemia Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Vision-Language Foundation Models

Jun 23, 2026cs.CV

A Benchmark for Hallucination Detection in VLMs for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Vision-language models (VLMs) are prone to hallucination, which remains a major barrier to their safe deployment in clinical practice. To date, most hallucination detection methods have been evaluated on radiology benchmarks such as MIMIC-CXR and VQA-RAD, while gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy remains largely underexplored. In this paper, we benchmark nine hallucination detection methods on the Gut-VLM dataset, a GI diagnostic Visual Question Answering (VQA) dataset with 4,392 test VQA pairs, across five VLMs (MedGemma-4B, MedGemma-27B, LLaVA-Med-7B, LLaVA-v1.6-7B, and Lingshu-32B). The methods span three categories: black-box methods (RadFlag, SelfCheckGPT-NLI), gray-box methods (AvgProb, AvgEnt, MaxProb, MaxEnt, Semantic Entropy, and VASE), and a white-box method (ReXTrust). Our results show that ReXTrust, a white-box method, achieves the highest AUC across all five models, outperforming the strongest alternative method on each VLM by a statistically significant margin (paired permutation test, p < 0.001 in all cases), reaching a peak AUC of 93.0 on MedGemma-4B. White-box hidden-state access provides a consistent advantage of 19.5 AUC points on average (range: 9.5--33.5), with ReXTrust maintaining strong performance even on LLaVA-v1.6-7B (AUC 79.9), where black-box methods and clustering-based gray-box methods collapse to near-chance performance. Among non-white-box methods, token-level gray-box statistics (MaxEnt, MaxProb) are the strongest alternatives, outperforming both clustering-based gray-box methods (Semantic Entropy, VASE) and black-box approaches on average. We further identify confident confabulation, a failure mode in which models hallucinate with high inter-sample consistency or high token-level probability, as a systemic failure for both consistency and uncertainty-based methods.

Aminu Lawal, Niyoj Oli, Sachin Acharya +3

University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom · Nepal Applied Mathematics and Informatics Institute for Research, Lalitpur, Nepal · West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States

Hallucination Detection Medical Vision-Language Models Colonoscopy Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Confabulation

May 30, 2026cs.CV

MM-Snowball: Evaluating and Mitigating Hallucination Snowballing in Multimodal Multi-Turn Dialogue

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable visual understanding, yet their reliability in interactive settings is severely undermined by hallucination snowballing: a phenomenon where initial errors amplify across conversational turns, leading to a collapse in coherence. This failure reveals a fundamental vulnerability where models progressively neglect visual grounding in favor of over-relying on polluted textual history. Existing benchmarks are predominantly confined to single-turn VQA, which fail to capture the complex dynamics of error propagation in long-horizon interactions. To address this, we introduce MM-Snowball, the first benchmark for fine-grained diagnosis of hallucination snowballing within dialogues. Extensive evaluation shows that our benchmark poses a significant challenge even to advanced MLLMs and reveals the inefficacy of existing mitigation methods designed for single-turn VQA. To counteract this degradation, we propose Conflict-Aware Visual Rectification (CAVR). This training-free method mitigates snowballing through a synergistic dual-mechanism that refreshes visual grounding at the representation level and rectifies output distributions at the logit level, effectively re-anchoring the model to visual facts. Experiments demonstrate that CAVR achieves state-of-the-art performance, offering a promising path toward more reliable interactive AI. Data and code are available at: https://frenkie-chiang.github.io/MM-Snowball

Yue Jiang, Xue Jiang, Lihua Zhang +6

College of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University · Southern University of Science and Technology · TMLR Group, Hong Kong Baptist University +3

Large Language Model Hallucination Hallucination Mitigation Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Rectification

Apr 20, 2026cs.CV

Revisiting Change VQA in Remote Sensing with Structured and Native Multimodal Qwen Models

Change visual question answering (Change VQA) addresses the problem of answering natural-language questions about semantic changes between bi-temporal remote sensing (RS) images. Although vision-language models (VLMs) have recently been studied for temporal RS image understanding, Change VQA remains underexplored in the context of modern multimodal models. In this letter, we revisit the CDVQA benchmark using recent Qwen models under a unified low-rank adaptation (LoRA) setting. We compare Qwen3-VL, which follows a structured vision-language pipeline with multi-depth visual conditioning and a full-attention decoder, with Qwen3.5, a native multimodal model that combines a single-stage alignment with a hybrid decoder backbone. Experimental results on the official CDVQA test splits show that recent VLMs improve over earlier specialized baselines. They further show that performance does not scale monotonically with model size, and that native multimodal models are more effective than structured vision-language pipelines for this task. These findings indicate that tightly integrated multimodal backbones contribute more to performance than scale or explicit multi-depth visual conditioning for language-driven semantic change reasoning in RS imagery.

Yakoub Bazi, Mohamad M. Al Rahhal, Mansour Zuair +1

Computer Engineering Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia · Applied Computer Science Department, College of Applied Computer Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

Remote Sensing Large Multimodal Models Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Qwen3

Apr 16, 2026cs.CV

AIM: Asymmetric Information Masking for Visual Question Answering Continual Learning

In continual visual question answering (VQA), existing Continual Learning (CL) methods are mostly built for symmetric, unimodal architectures. However, modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) violate this assumption, as their trainable components are inherently asymmetric. This structural mismatch renders VLMs highly prone to catastrophic forgetting when learning from continuous data streams. Specifically, the asymmetry causes standard global regularization to favor the massive language decoder during optimization, leaving the smaller but critical visual projection layers highly vulnerable to interference. Consequently, this localized degradation leads to a severe loss of compositional reasoning capabilities. To address this, we propose Asymmetric Information Masking (AIM), which balances stability and plasticity by applying targeted masks based on modality-specific sensitivity. Experiments on VQA v2 and GQA under continual VQA settings show that AIM achieves state-of-the-art performance in both Average Performance (AP) and Average Forgetting (AF), while better preserving generalization to novel skill-concept compositions.

Peifeng Zhang, Zice Qiu, Donghua Yu +4

Sun Yat-Sen University · National Supercomputing Center in Shenzhen · Tsinghua University

Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Catastrophic Forgetting Continual Learning

Dec 4, 2025cs.CV

Counterfeit Answers: Adversarial Forgery against OCR-Free Document Visual Question Answering

Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) enables end-to-end reasoning grounded on information present in a document input. While recent models have shown impressive capabilities, they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this work, we introduce a novel attack scenario that aims to forge document content in a visually imperceptible yet semantically targeted manner, allowing an adversary to induce specific or generally incorrect answers from a DocVQA model. We develop specialized attack algorithms that can produce adversarially forged documents tailored to different attackers' goals, ranging from targeted misinformation to systematic model failure scenarios. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach against two end-to-end state-of-the-art models: Pix2Struct, a vision-language transformer that jointly processes image and text through sequence-to-sequence modeling, and Donut, a transformer-based model that directly extracts text and answers questions from document images. Our findings highlight critical vulnerabilities in current DocVQA systems and call for the development of more robust defenses. We release our open source code at https://github.com/pralab/adv-docVQA.

Marco Pintore, Maura Pintor, Dimosthenis Karatzas +1

University of Cagliari, Italy · CINI, Italy · Computer Vision Center, UAB, Spain

Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering Document

Nov 27, 2025cs.CV

Unexplored flaws in multiple-choice VQA make benchmarking unreliable

Previous works identify sensitivity to option order as a key issue in multiple-choice VQA (MC-VQA) evaluation and propose protocols to mitigate this effect. We show that such mitigation is insufficient to ensure the validity of MC-VQA as a reliable benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLMs): performance remains highly sensitive to semantically neutral prompt format choices that are not controlled by current benchmarks. In a large-scale study spanning seven MLLMs and five MC-VQAs datasets, we find frequent rank reversals even under order-invariant evaluation. These reversals arise when we systematically vary option ID sets, delimiters, and separators, yielding 48 semantically equivalent prompt formats. Mechanistic analyses trace this instability to low-level language modeling effects: tokenizer-induced fusion or removal of option ID tokens introduces corrupted option ID tokens into the input sequence, while the choice of option ID sets directly affects the reliability of attention patterns for option selection. Accordingly, MC-VQA rankings correlate weakly with open-ended evaluation, indicating that MC-VQA reflects option-selection dynamics in addition to multimodal reasoning. These findings identify prompt formatting as a major, previously under-controlled confounder in MC-VQA benchmarking and motivate evaluation protocols that explicitly control prompt format sensitivity.

Fabio Rosenthal, Sebastian Schmidt, Thorsten Graf +3

Technical University of Munich · Volkswagen AG · Helmholtz AI +1

Multiple-Choice Visual Question Answering