Open-Ended Evolution

Hash Chemistry is a family of minimalistic evolutionary models in which a deterministic hash function assigns a scalar score to entities of arbitrary size, opening a combinatorially vast possibility space (a ``cardinality leap''). Since its introduction, the idea has been realized in several settings, from the original spatial formulation to a fast non-spatial variant and then to structural cellular models. Here we review the Hash Chemistry family as a coherent modeling framework and use it to explore how minimal systems can demonstrate the mechanisms behind multiscale open-ended evolutionary dynamics. The most recent model, Structural Cellular Hash Chemistry (SCHC), successfully demonstrated multiscale ecological interaction/adaptation and complexity growth of replicators in a computationally efficient manner. In this study, we first extend SCHC to incorporate spatial locality and dyadicity of competitive interactions among replicating structures. We show this extension substantially enhances SCHC's evolutionary dynamics. Furthermore, we explore SCHC in a significantly larger spatial domain using a GPU-accelerated implementation. We show that the size of the space acts as a control parameter for a stochastic, nucleation-like transition between a compact-replicator regime and a runaway size-dominance regime, and we separate the responsible mechanism into a non-spatial, size-biased sampling feedback and a finite-size spatial effect. Altogether, these results illustrate the rich potential of Hash Chemistry as a minimal, mechanistically transparent testbed for studying open-ended evolution across scales.

Biological evolution sustains complex dynamics without any fitness function, yet virtually all evolutionary algorithms depend on one. Genesis is an open-source platform designed to test, empirically, what an artificial system needs to sustain evolutionary dynamics after complete fitness removal. Evolution in Genesis is governed by physical constraints, relational dominance, and adaptive regulation - no scalar fitness, no designer-specified objectives. Across experiments totalling over one million evolutionary generations, Genesis has: (i) shown that constraint-driven selection can sustain evolutionary activity after complete fitness removal (7/12 runs; Wilson 95% CI [30.2%, 82.5%]; p<0.01, Cohen's d=1.47 vs. baselines); (ii) produced a sham-controlled negative result demonstrating that niche construction alone does not break the complexity plateau; and (iii) provided preliminary evidence that speciation-protected niche construction initiates structural diversification that unprotected secretion cannot. These findings establish empirical boundaries for fitness-free evolution and open a new direction: meta-evolution of physics, in which the laws governing an evolutionary system are themselves evolved.

Can evolutionary dynamics characteristic of biological development arise without a designer-specified fitness function? We present Genesis, a platform in which agents inhabit a Gray-Scott reaction-diffusion substrate and evolve under physical constraints alone. Three successive experimental cycles, each testing one falsifiable hypothesis, show: (1) constraint-driven selection sustains evolutionary activity after complete fitness removal but reaches a hard phenotypic complexity ceiling; (2) agent-mediated niche construction via chemical secretion is real but causally insufficient to break that ceiling; and (3) replacing the fixed-alphabet genome with a Compositional Pattern Producing Network (CPPN) indirect encoding, protected by NEAT-style speciation, produces the first evidence of progressive structural complexification in a fitness-free system. Null results are treated as precise, informative answers rather than failures, yielding reusable diagnostic tools and a sham-control protocol applicable to any open-ended evolution evaluation pipeline.

Open-ended evolution (OEE) in artificial life is typically driven by uninterpretable, black-box neural-network complexity metrics, leaving life-like systems disconnected from physical theories of complexity. We introduce MSPD (Multi-Scale Path Divergence, denoted DP ), a renormalization-group-inspired scalar that quantifies the temporal multiscale organization of heterogeneity in local transition laws. MSPD is defined at the population level as a functional of the realised trajectory and is computed as a windowed finite-resolution estimator, with consistency between the two stated as a proposition. The metric is an explicit formula and plays a dual role: as a gradient-free fitness function and as a post-hoc analytical lens on any simulation that exposes local transition laws. Empirically, MSPD-optimized parameters produce higher held-out complexity scores than matched random parameters from the same substrate. High-$H_{Delta_t}$ states correspond to states with higher instability to external interventions, so the metric tracks the biology of the underlying dynamics rather than noise. Higher MSPD corresponds to stronger scale-dependent frustration: high-complexity systems exhibit larger differences between the dynamics expressed at different spatial extents, linking MSPD directly to the frustration criterion of biological complexity in the sense of Vanchurin et al. [ 23 ]. The same protocol transfers beyond the primary Flow-Lenia substrate to Life-like cellular automata and Particle Life++, where C1, C2 and C5 all hold. A single explicit formula thus both directs open-ended evolution and provides a principled bridge to the physics of complexity that black-box drivers do not.

Deep research and agent evolution serve as de-facto tasks for AI agents in real-world applications toward artificial general intelligence. The former enables autonomous retrieval and integration of information in open-ended environments to tackle open-ended research tasks, yet it is constrained by the static parametric deep research capabilities of agent systems. The latter allows agents to autonomously interact with the environment to gain experiences that evolve model capabilities. However, its effectiveness has been widely validated only on verifiable tasks with standard answers, leaving a gap with open-ended research tasks. To bridge these two critical tasks, we propose the Hybrid Open-Ended Tri-Evolution (HOTE) framework, which leverages hybrid-mode reinforcement learning to facilitate the collaborative evolution of a proposer, solver and judge based on web-scale knowledge, moving toward autonomous evolving agents in open-ended tasks and environments. Extensive experiments on three long-form deep research benchmarks demonstrate that the 8B model trained via HOTE surpasses the strongest static open 8-32B models as well as those trained by state-of-the-art deep research training methods with less time overhead, and further verify that the evolution of all three modules in HOTE is indispensable.

The generation of sustained, open-ended complexity from local interactions remains a fundamental challenge in artificial life. Differentiable multi-agent systems, such as Petri Dish Neural Cellular Automata (PD-NCA), exhibit rich self-organization driven purely by spatial competition; however, they are highly sensitive to hyperparameters and frequently collapse into uninteresting patterns and dynamics, such as frozen equilibria or structureless noise. In this paper, we introduce PBT-NCA, a meta-evolutionary algorithm that evolves a population of PD-NCAs subject to a composite objective that rewards both historical behavioral novelty and contemporary visual diversity. Driven by this continuous evolutionary pressure, PBT-NCA spontaneously generates a plethora of emergent lifelike phenomena over extended horizons-a hallmark of true open-endedness. Strikingly, the substrate autonomously discovers diverse morphological survival and self-organization strategies. We observe highly regular, coordinated periodic waves; spore-like scattering where homogeneous groups eject cell-like clusters to colonize distant territories; and fluid, shape-shifting macro-structures that migrate across the substrate, maintaining stable outer boundaries that enclose highly active interiors. By actively penalizing monocultures and dead states, PBT-NCA sustains a state of effective complexity that is neither globally ordered nor globally random, operating persistently at the "edge of chaos".

Evolve-based agent such as AlphaEvolve is one of the notable successes in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to build AI Scientists. These agents tackle open-ended scientific problems by iteratively improving and evolving programs, leveraging the prior knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Despite the success, existing evolve-based agents lack targeted guidance for evolution and effective mechanisms for organizing and utilizing knowledge acquired from past evolutionary experience. Consequently, they suffer from decreasing evolution efficiency and exhibit oscillatory behavior when approaching known performance boundaries. To mitigate the gap, we develop CausalEvolve, equipped with a causal scratchpad that leverages LLMs to identify and reason about guiding factors for evolution. At the beginning, CausalEvolve first identifies outcome-level factors that offer complementary inspirations in improving the target objective. During the evolution, CausalEvolve also inspects surprise patterns during the evolution and abductive reasoning to hypothesize new factors, which in turn offer novel directions. Through comprehensive experiments, we show that CausalEvolve effectively improves the evolutionary efficiency and discovers better solutions in 4 challenging open-ended scientific tasks.

This report documents the work of our group (named SymBa) at the ALICE 2026 workshop in Copenhagen. Inspired by the pioneering work by Nils Aall Barricelli on symbiogenesis of numerical organisms (i.e., 1D cellular automata) in 1953 (70+ years ago!!), we discussed the role of symbiogenesis as mechanism contributing to the origins of life, open-endedness, and collective intelligence. We report replications of Barricelli's original work in 1D worlds, an extension to 2D symbioorganisms, and preliminary experimentation with DNA-norms. We discuss the implications of symbiogenesis for artifical life and artificial intelligence, and outline several opportunities for future works, both at the conceptual level as well as using different substrates (neural networks, neural cellular automata, etc.)

As autonomous agents increasingly operate in real-world digital ecosystems, understanding how they coordinate, form institutions, and accumulate shared culture becomes both a scientific and practical priority. This paper introduces TerraLingua, a persistent multi-agent ecology designed to study open-ended dynamics in such systems. Unlike prior large language model simulations with static or consequence-free environments, TerraLingua imposes resource constraints and limited lifespans for the agents. As a result, agents create artifacts that persist beyond individuals, shaping future interactions and selection pressures. To characterize the dynamics, an AI Anthropologist systematically analyzes agent behavior, group structure, and artifact evolution. Across experimental conditions, the results reveal the emergence of cooperative norms, division of labor, governance attempts, and branching artifact lineages consistent with cumulative cultural processes. Divergent outcomes across experimental runs can be traced back to specific innovations and organizational structures. TerraLingua thus provides a platform for characterizing the mechanisms of cumulative culture and social organization in artificial populations, and can serve as a foundation for guiding real-world agentic populations to socially beneficial outcomes.

One of the main goals of artificial life research is to recreate in artificial systems the trends for ever more complex and novel entities, interactions and processes that we see in Earth's biosphere, that is, to create open-ended systems. In this paper, we test for Tokyo type 1 open-ended evolution (OEE) of the Tree of Life Simulation (ToLSim), an artificial life software created by Lana Sinapayen. To do so, we conducted an experiment to measure evolutionary activity statistics. These require us to define the notion of components. Here, we define components as the agent's genes. The results show that ToLSim is capable of exhibiting unbounded total cumulative evolutionary activity. However, total and median normalized cumulative evolutionary activity appear bounded and new evolutionary activity is persistently null, suggesting that ToLSim is not open-ended. Further studies on ToLSim could repeat this experiment with individuals or even species, rather than genes, to test whether the present results are valid.

Complex change is often described as ``evolutionary'' in economics, policy, technology, and organizations, yet many system dynamics models represent behavior within a fixed set of stocks, flows, relationships, and transition rules. Such models can generate nonlinear, oscillatory, path-dependent, or chaotic behavior, but structural novelty must ordinarily be specified in advance. This paper argues that evolutionary dynamics should be treated as a core systems-thinking problem rather than as a biological metaphor. We introduce Stability-Driven Assembly (SDA), a minimal non-equilibrium framework in which stochastic interactions and differential persistence generate endogenous selection without genes, template-based replication, or an externally specified fitness function. Longer-lived configurations accumulate in the population and therefore become more likely to participate in subsequent interactions. This creates feedback among persistence, population composition, and future pattern formation. The resulting abundance-weighted sampling is equivalent to fitness-proportional selection, allowing SDA to be interpreted as a natural genetic algorithm driven by persistence-weighted population dynamics. SDA provides a conceptual basis for distinguishing fixed-state-space dynamics from evolving possibility spaces, in which persistent structures can reshape future flows, interactions, and available configurations. It also suggests that equilibrium should be treated as provisional: a quasi-stable regime may be reorganized when a more persistent configuration emerges. We conclude by outlining two ways to extend system dynamics practice: constructing an SDA-style population model alongside a stock-flow model, and using SDA perturbation analysis to examine the vulnerability of an existing regime to structural innovation.

Artificial learning systems are graduating from passive learners to increasingly autonomous agents, lending pragmatic urgency to the question of what constitutes agency. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers arguably the most explicit formulation of agent-environment interaction, built on three core tenets: the environment as a Markov decision process, learning as policy optimization, and the agent as a maximizer of scalar reward. Recent work has called to revise these tenets: reconceptualizing learning as adaptation rather than optimization, broadening goals beyond scalar reward, and noting the absence of a formal theory of the agent in a formalism that so heavily emphasizes the environment. We argue that the artificial life community is uniquely positioned to illuminate this critique and concretize an alternative. We draw on open-ended novelty search as a complementary model of adaptation and goal-directed behavior beyond reward optimization, and ground such evolutionary dynamics in thermodynamic theories of origin-of-life and agency, toward a more biologically faithful and formally grounded account of what it is to be an adaptive agent.