Physics-Informed ML
ML: Machine Learning
Overview
Physics-informed machine learning studies how to combine observations with governing equations, conservation laws, symmetries, and other scientific knowledge. Common approaches include physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) that penalize equation residuals, weak or variational formulations, neural operators for families of PDE solutions, and hybrid models that learn corrections to mechanistic simulators. These methods are used for forward simulation, inverse problems, parameter estimation, forecasting, and fast surrogates when measurements or computational resources are limited. A central challenge is that physical constraints can improve data efficiency and consistency but can also hinder training or harm predictions when the equations, discretization, or assumed structure do not match the system.
Latest papers
843 papers75 papers in the last four weeks, down 13% on the four weeks before. 0.4% of all new papers.
Adaptively trained Physics-informed Radial Basis Function Neural Networks for Solving Multi-asset Option Pricing Problems
Disentangling Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Physics-Informed Neural Networks. Application to Insulation Material Degradation Prognostics
Deep Neural Networks as Discrete Dynamical Systems: Implications for Physics-Informed Learning
Evolutionary Physics-Informed Temporal Fusion for Lane-Change Intention Prediction
KIGNet: Physics-Motivated Multi-Graph Representation Learning for Explainable Jet Tagging
Quantum-Classical Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Reservoir Seepage Equations
Neural network-driven domain decomposition for efficient solutions to the Helmholtz equation
Hard-constraint physics-residual networks for hydrogen crossover prediction and high-pressure extrapolation in PEM water electrolysis
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Speech Production
LieSolver: PDE-Constrained Learning for IBVPs via Lie Symmetries
Complexity Dependent Error Rates for Physics-informed Statistical Learning via the Small-ball Method
Inverse Problem for Partial Differential Equations with Jump Discontinuities in Coefficients by Two-stage Physics-Informed Deep Learning and Statistical Mixture Models
Neural non-canonical Hamiltonian dynamics for long-time simulations
MAD-PINN: A Decentralized Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Safe and Optimal Multi-Agent Control
Physics-informed GNN for medium-high voltage AC power flow with edge-aware attention and line search correction operator
A Flow-rate-conserving CNN-based Domain Decomposition Method for Blood Flow Simulations
Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methods for Wide Two-Layer Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Poisson Equation
InSituRes: A Physics-Informed Same-Grid Model for Enhanced Dynamic X-ray Micro-CT Reconstructions
Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems
DPG loss functions for learning parameter-to-solution maps by neural networks
GeNeRT: A Physics-Informed Approach to Intelligent Wireless Channel Modeling via Generalizable Neural Ray Tracing
Interpretability and Generalization Bounds for Learning Spatial Physics
Physics-Informed Distillation of Diffusion Models for PDE-Constrained Generation
Data-driven multi-agent modelling of calcium interactions in cell culture: PINN vs Regularized Least-squares
Repulsive Ensembles for Bayesian Inference in Physics-informed Neural Networks
Accelerating Natural Gradient Descent for PINNs with Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra
Physics-Informed Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Bayesian Inference in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Residuals Are Not Enough: Limits of Physics-Informed Pre-Training for Scientific Foundation Models
nice,'' e.g., structured, well-aligned settings: it enhances generalization and reduces data dependence, compared to data-only pre-training. However, these advantages diminish significantly as the downstream tasks become harder,'' e.g., as they involve discontinuities or deviate from the pre-training distribution. In complex or structurally different problems, such as those involving new boundary conditions or PDE operators, physics-informed models may perform only on par with---or even worse---than data-driven baselines. While residual-based pre-training helps in idealized regimes, realizing broadly transferable SciFMs will likely require subtler spatiotemporal inductive biases and more principled integration of physical knowledge into model architectures.