Semantic Textual Similarity

While digitized corpora have transformed the study of intellectual transmission, current methods rely heavily on lexical text reuse detection, capturing verbatim quotations but fundamentally missing paraphrases and complex implicit engagement. This paper evaluates semantic search in 18th-century intellectual history through the reception of John Locke's foundational work. Using expert annotation grounded in a semantic taxonomy, we examine whether an off-the-shelf semantic search pipeline can surface meaning-level correspondences overlooked by lexical methods. Our results demonstrate that semantic search retrieves substantially more implicit receptions than lexical baselines. However, linguistic diagnostics also reveal a "lexical gatekeeping" effect, where retrieval remains partially constrained by surface vocabulary overlap. These findings highlight both the potential and the limitations of semantic retrieval for analyzing the circulation of ideas in large historical corpora. The data is available at https://github.com/COMHIS/locke-sim-data.

We investigate the extent to which cosine similarity between paragraph embeddings is invariant under machine translation, using the Manifesto Corpus of over 2,800 political party platforms in 28 languages translated to English via the EU eTranslation service. Rather than measuring translation-induced semantic shift directly we measure the stability of pairwise similarity relationships across embedding models, and use inter-model disagreement on original-language text as a calibrated invariance threshold. This yields a per-language non-inferiority test for four hypotheses about how translation interacts with embedding choice, with verdicts that distinguish languages where translation demonstrably preserves semantic structure from those where it demonstrably degrades it and from those where the available evidence does not resolve the question. The framework is corpus- and pipeline-agnostic and extends naturally to downstream tasks. Applied to our data, it identifies ten languages with translation invariance and four with detectable distortion.

We present the shared task on narrative similarity and narrative representation learning - NSNRL (pronounced "nass-na-rel"). The task operationalizes narrative similarity as a binary classification problem: determining which of two stories is more similar to an anchor story. We introduce a novel definition of narrative similarity, compatible with both narrative theory and intuitive judgment. Based on the similarity judgments collected under this concept, we also evaluate narrative embedding representations. We collected at least two annotations each for more than 1,000 story summary triples, with each annotation being backed by at least two annotators in agreement. This paper describes the sampling and annotation process for the dataset; further, we give an overview of the submitted systems and the techniques they employ. We received a total of 71 final submissions from 46 teams across our two tracks. In our triple-based classification setup, LLM ensembles make up many of the top-scoring systems, while in the embedding setup, systems with pre- and post-processing on pretrained embedding models perform about on par with custom fine-tuned solutions. Our analysis identifies potential headroom for improvement of automated systems in both tracks. The task website includes visualizations of embeddings alongside instance-level classification results for all teams.

We propose a scalable, multifactorial experimental framework that systematically probes LLM sensitivity to subtle semantic changes in pairwise document comparison. We analogize this as a needle-in-a-haystack problem: a single semantically altered sentence (the needle) is embedded within surrounding context (the hay), and we vary the perturbation type (negation, conjunction swap, named entity replacement), context type (original vs. topically unrelated), needle position, and document length across all combinations, testing seven LLMs on tens of thousands of document pairs. Our analysis reveals several striking findings. First, LLMs can exhibit a within-document positional bias distinct from previously studied candidate-order effects: some models penalize semantic differences more harshly when they occur earlier in a document. Second, when the altered sentence is surrounded by topically unrelated context, it raises similarity scores in almost all settings. This is consistent with a contradiction account, in which topically related context allows the alteration to conflict with the surrounding sentences. Third, all models exhibit the same hierarchy in how harshly they score different perturbation types, with negation penalized the most, but express this hierarchy on significantly different scales. Finally, varying the prompt's conception of semantic similarity across several alternatives changes the magnitude but not the direction of these effects. Together, these results demonstrate how LLM semantic similarity scores are sensitive to the aforementioned parameters in ways that go beyond the semantic change itself; our framework offers a practical toolkit for auditing and comparing scoring behavior across current and future models.

Web applications rely heavily on hyperlinks to connect disparate information resources. However, the dynamic nature of the web leads to link rot, where targets become unavailable, and more insidiously, semantic drift, where a valid HTTP 200 connection exists, but the target content no longer aligns with the source context. Traditional verification tools, which primarily function as crash oracles by checking HTTP status codes, often fail to detect semantic inconsistencies, thereby compromising web integrity and user experience. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer semantic understanding, they suffer from high latency, privacy concerns, and prohibitive costs for large-scale regression testing. In this paper, we propose SemLink, a novel automated test oracle for semantic hyperlink verification. SemLink leverages a Siamese Neural Network architecture powered by a pre-trained Sentence-BERT (SBERT) backbone to compute the semantic coherence between a hyperlink's source context (anchor text, surrounding DOM elements, and visual features) and its target page content. To train and evaluate our model, we introduce the Hyperlink-Webpage Positive Pairs (HWPPs) dataset, a rigorously constructed corpus of over 60,000 semantic pairs. Our evaluation demonstrates that SemLink achieves a Recall of 96.00%, comparable to state-of-the-art LLMs (GPT-5.2), while operating approximately 47.5 times faster and requiring significantly fewer computational resources. This work bridges the gap between traditional syntactic checkers and expensive generative AI, offering a robust and efficient solution for automated web quality assurance.

Predicting narrative similarity can be understood as an inherently interpretive task: different, equally valid readings of the same text can produce divergent interpretations and thus different similarity judgments, posing a fundamental challenge for semantic evaluation benchmarks that encode a single ground truth. Rather than treating this multiperspectivity as a challenge to overcome, we propose to incorporate it in the decision making process of predictive systems. To explore this strategy, we created an ensemble of 31 LLM personas. These range from practitioners following interpretive frameworks to more intuitive, lay-style characters. Our experiments were conducted on the SemEval-2026 Task 4 dataset, where the system achieved an accuracy score of 0.705. Accuracy improves with ensemble size, consistent with Condorcet Jury Theorem-like dynamics under weakened independence. Practitioner personas perform worse individually but produce less correlated errors, yielding larger ensemble gains under majority voting. Our error analysis reveals a consistent negative association between gender-focused interpretive vocabulary and accuracy across all persona categories, suggesting either attention to dimensions not relevant for the benchmark or valid interpretations absent from the ground truth. This finding underscores the need for evaluation frameworks that account for interpretive plurality.

Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) is a crucial component of many Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications. However, existing approaches typically reduce semantic nuances to a single score, limiting interpretability. To address this, we introduce the task of Dissimilar Span Detection (DSD), which aims to identify semantically differing spans between pairs of texts. This can help users understand which particular words or tokens negatively affect the similarity score, or be used to improve performance in STS-dependent downstream tasks. Furthermore, we release a new dataset suitable for the task, the Span Similarity Dataset (SSD), developed through a semi-automated pipeline combining large language models (LLMs) with human verification. We propose and evaluate different baseline methods for DSD, both unsupervised, based on LIME, SHAP, LLMs, and our own method, as well as an additional supervised approach. While LLMs and supervised models achieve the highest performance, overall results remain low, highlighting the complexity of the task. Finally, we set up an additional experiment that shows how DSD can lead to increased performance in the specific task of paraphrase detection.

The escalating frequency of cyber-attacks poses significant challenges for organisations, particularly small enterprises constrained by limited in-house expertise, insufficient knowledge, and financial resources. This research presents a novel framework that leverages Natural Language Processing to address these challenges through automated mapping of cyber incidents to adversary techniques. We introduce the Cyber Catalog, a knowledge base that systematically integrates CIS Critical Security Controls, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and SMART metrics. This integrated resource enables organisations to connect threat intelligence directly to actionable controls and measurable outcomes. To operationalise the framework, we fine-tuned all-mpnet-base-v2, a highly regarded sentence-transformers model used to convert text into numerical vectors on an augmented dataset comprising 74,986 incident-technique pairs to enhance semantic similarity between cyber incidents and MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Our fine-tuned model achieved a Spearman correlation of 0.7894 and Pearson correlation of 0.8756, demonstrating substantial improvements over top baseline models including all-mpnet-base-v2, all-distilroberta-v1, and all-MiniLM-L12-v2. Furthermore, our model exhibited significantly lower prediction errors (MAE = 0.135, MSE = 0.027) compared to all baseline models, confirming superior accuracy and consistency. The Cyber Catalog, training dataset, trained model, and implementation code made publicly available to facilitate further research and enable practical deployment in resource-constrained environments. This work bridges the gap between threat intelligence and operational security management, providing an actionable tool for systematic cyber incident response and evidence-based cyber risk management.

The recent success of large pre-trained language models (PLMs) has motivated their integration into topic modeling. However, PLM-augmented topic models differ from classical co-occurrence models such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) not only in performance, but also in the type of semantic structure they capture. We formalize this distinction along two psycholinguistic axes: thematic relatedness (dog/bone) and taxonomic similarity (dog/wolf). To measure both axes over topic words, we construct a large synthetic benchmark of word pairs using LLM-based annotation and train a neural scorer on it. Across multiple corpora and model families, the scorer places different topic-model families at distinct positions within the joint similarity-relatedness space. The two scores further predict downstream task performance: tasks requiring similarity benefit from similarity-rich topics, whereas tasks requiring relatedness benefit from the converse, and excessive emphasis on either axis degrades performance on tasks aligned with the opposing semantic structure. Neither axis is uniformly beneficial. Measuring both therefore provides a practical, model-agnostic diagnostic for evaluating the semantic structure captured by topic models.

This research focuses on developing advanced methods for assessing similarity between recipes by combining different sources of information and analytical approaches. We explore the semantic, lexical, and domain similarity of food recipes, evaluated through the analysis of ingredients, preparation methods, and nutritional attributes. A web-based interface was developed to allow domain experts to validate the combined similarity results. After evaluating 318 recipe pairs, experts agreed on 255 (80%). The evaluation of expert assessments enables the estimation of which similarity aspects--lexical, semantic, or nutritional--are most influential in expert decision-making. The application of these methods has broad implications in the food industry and supports the development of personalized diets, nutrition recommendations, and automated recipe generation systems.

Large language models (LLMs) have gained significant attention by many researchers and practitioners in natural language processing (NLP) since the introduction of ChatGPT in 2022. One notable feature of ChatGPT is its ability to generate summaries based on prompts. Yet evaluating the quality of these summaries remains challenging due to the complexity of language. To this end, in this paper we suggest a new method of LLM summary inference with BERT-SVD-based direction metric and SOFARI (LIDS) that assesses the summary accuracy equipped with interpretable key words for layered themes. The LIDS uses a latent SVD-based direction metric to measure the similarity between the summaries and original text, leveraging the BERT embeddings and repeated prompts to quantify the statistical uncertainty. As a result, LIDS gives a natural embedding of each summary for large text reduction. We further exploit SOFARI to uncover important key words associated with each latent theme in the summary with controlled false discovery rate (FDR). Comprehensive empirical studies demonstrate the practical utility and robustness of LIDS through human verification and comparisons to other similarity metrics, including a comparison of different LLMs.

Tracing connections between historical texts is an important part of intertextual research, enabling scholars to reconstruct the virtual library of a writer and identify the sources influencing their creative process. These intertextual links manifest in diverse forms, ranging from direct verbatim quotations to subtle allusions and paraphrases disguised by morphological variation. Language models offer a promising path forward due to their capability of capturing semantic similarity beyond lexical overlap. However, the development of new methods for this task is held back by the scarcity of standardized benchmarks and easy-to-use datasets. We address this gap by introducing Loci Similes, a benchmark for Latin intertextuality detection comprising a curated dataset of ~176k text segments and 1,490 expert-verified parallels, including 945 labeled references from an existing dataset. Using this data, we establish baselines for retrieval and classification of intertextualities with both lexical methods and pretrained encoder language models.

Financial text embeddings must distinguish changes in event status, perspective, and obligations even when passages share similar wording. NMIXX adapts existing encoders through 18.8k source-linked triplets: paraphrases and Korean-English translations preserve meaning, while targeted financial rewrites introduce semantic contrasts. We examine this recipe across seven backbones on English and Korean financial and general-domain semantic textual similarity (STS), and analyze the composition and passage lengths of KorFinSTS. BGE-M3 attains the highest adapted financial correlations in this comparison, improving from 0.1969 to 0.2967 on FinSTS and from 0.0512 to 0.2732 on KorFinSTS. Its general English and Korean correlations decrease by 0.0391 and 0.0463. Across the seven models, five improve their mean financial correlation, but all reduce their mean general-domain correlation. Per-language comparisons and benchmark-weight sensitivity analysis reveal differences obscured by a single aggregate score. The study contributes a finance-specific supervision design and evidence for evaluating adaptation jointly with retained general semantic capability; direct cross-language retrieval remains outside its evaluation scope.

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at complex reasoning through search algorithms, yet current strategies often suffer from massive token consumption due to redundant exploration of semantically equivalent steps. Existing semantic similarity methods struggle to accurately identify such equivalence in domain-specific contexts like mathematical reasoning. To address this, we propose EquivPruner, a simple yet effective approach that identifies and prunes semantically equivalent actions during LLM reasoning search. We also introduce MathEquiv, the first dataset we created for mathematical statement equivalence, which enables the training of a lightweight equivalence detector. Extensive experiments across various models and tasks demonstrate that EquivPruner significantly reduces token consumption, improving searching efficiency and often bolstering reasoning accuracy. For instance, when applied to Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct on GSM8K, EquivPruner reduced token consumption by 48.1% while also improving accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lolo1222/EquivPruner.