Unimodal Representations

Most advances in keypoint descriptions address monomodal settings, where image variations arise from viewpoint, illumination, or contrast changes. Multimodal scenarios involve images produced by fundamentally different sensing processes, such as multispectral imaging, RGB-depth, satellite imagery, or medical imaging, causing the same structures to appear differently. A common solution to cross-modal description is to train descriptors for each modality pair, which requires retraining whenever the modalities change, or to train large models, which incur a significant increase in runtime. Instead, we propose CrossFeat, a framework that enables an existing monomodal descriptor to operate across modalities. Our method learns a crossing function in descriptor space that maps features from one modality to a representation compatible with another. To preserve the structural information captured by the original descriptor, CrossFeat introduces a geometry-appearance disentanglement such that only appearance is altered while the geometric properties are preserved. Experiments across multiple domains and datasets demonstrate improved performance in multimodal matching.

Multimodal intent recognition requires understanding not only what textual, acoustic, and visual signals share, but also how they disagree. Such disagreement is frequently class-informative; for example, lexical positivity accompanied by incongruent vocal or facial behavior may indicate sarcasm or taunting, yet most fusion methods either encourage modality alignment or treat inconsistency as uncertainty to be suppressed. We propose MACH (Modality Agreement- and Conflict-aware prototype Hypergraph), a hierarchical prototype-hypergraph framework that represents multimodal agreement and conflict as distinct, recurring relational structures. MACH progressively composes unimodal representations into bimodal and trimodal abstractions. At each applicable level, modality-composition anchors activate sparse agreement prototype hypergraphs that capture reusable consensus patterns, while a separate conflict pathway maps cross-modal discrepancies to dedicated conflict prototype hypergraphs. The two pathways are combined through a feature-wise, sample-adaptive arbitration mechanism, enabling the model to preserve informative disagreement while suppressing incidental modality noise. A progressive optimization strategy stabilizes the interdependent hierarchy before joint agreement-conflict learning. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation, while component and robustness analyses validate the distinct roles of hierarchical composition, prototype-mediated semantic refinement, and agreement-conflict arbitration.

The promise of multimodal fusion lies in combining complementary sources of evidence, yet more evidence does not always yield a better prediction. Recent multimodal models have advanced fusion through richer cross-modal interaction and sample-adaptive fusion. However, the influence assigned to a modality during fusion does not reveal whether that source is unreliable, redundant, or poorly matched to a specialized expert. To address this limitation, we introduce TIER-MoE, a risk-guided subspace mixture-of-experts model that defines sample-specific modality reliability as the prediction loss its unimodal predictor is expected to incur. This risk is learned from out-of-fold predictions generated by models that were not trained on the corresponding sample. TIER-MoE combines the estimated risk with expert-specific subspace compatibility for sparse modality-expert routing, while an always-active shared path preserves multimodal complementarity. We evaluate TIER-MoE on four public multimodal biomedical datasets spanning Alzheimer's disease status, skin-lesion malignancy, and retinal classification. Results demonstrate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods in predictive performance and probability calibration, with consistent improvements in Macro-F1 and Brier score and strong zero-shot generalization to an external cohort.

Multimodal emotion and sentiment recognition is commonly addressed by early fusion, which concatenates modalities before classification, or late fusion, which combines independently trained unimodal predictors. Early fusion can be accurate but monolithic, while late fusion is modular but may lose cross-modal interactions. This paper revisits XAI-guided adaptive fusion (\xgaf), a tree-based mixture of unimodal and cross-modal experts whose sample-level weights are derived from TreeSHAP attribution magnitudes. We focus on the effect of SHAP attribution reduction when experts have unequal feature dimensionalities. In this setting, mean-abs and median-abs reductions can suppress high-dimensional cross-modal experts, whereas sum-abs reduction preserves total attribution mass. On MELD 7-class emotion recognition, sum-abs \xgaf{} nearly matches early fusion across three face-sequence aggregators; the Transformer variant reaches 0.5983 \wf{}, compared with 0.6018 for early fusion and 0.4598 for probability-average late fusion. McNemar testing shows no significant difference between sum-abs \xgaf{} and early fusion on MELD ($p=1.000$), while \xgaf{} remains significantly better than late fusion ($p<0.0001$). On CMU-MOSEI 3-class sentiment recognition, sum-abs \xgaf{} reaches 0.6519 \wf{}, slightly exceeding early fusion (0.6485) and late fusion (0.5696). Ablation studies show that the main gain comes from adding cross-modal experts, especially the trimodal expert, rather than from complex per-sample routing. Diagnostics further show that mean-abs and median-abs weights are nearly uniform, while sum-abs weights concentrate on the trimodal expert. Thus, the main contribution is a transparent empirical analysis of how SHAP reduction, expert dimensionality, and cross-modal expert design affect modular multimodal fusion.

Effective robot-to-human communication can increase transparency and trust, reduce uncertainty, and contribute to safer collaboration in shared workspaces. Designing and validating an effective robot communication strategy is challenging due to the varying and often limited communication modalities across robots, differences in how diverse recipients interpret messages, and the underexplored virtual-to-real gap in studies of communication legibility. We present a systematic, large-scale comparative validation of existing communication strategies for a mobile non-humanoid robot across message types and settings (online and in-person). Based on the prescribed message types in the existing standards for industrial robots, we realize and compare a low-expressive, unimodal LED-based strategy with a highly expressive, multimodal one that leverages robotic gaze, gestures, and voice. For each strategy, we analyze the communication of a turning intention, an attention request, error status, whether the robot is stuck, and whether it is functioning normally. We evaluate these strategies in replicated online and in-person experiments. We find strong evidence that highly expressive multimodal communication is perceived as more legible and intuitive than unimodal LED-based communication. Comparing the online and real-world study findings, we observe a notable decrease in overall legibility, particularly for signaling with LEDs. Similarly, confidence in message interpretation decreases during the real-world evaluation.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are trained on massive multimodal data, making data unlearning increasingly important as data owners may request the removal of specific content. In practice, these requests often arrive sequentially over time, giving rise to the challenging problem of MLLM Lifelong Unlearning. However, most existing benchmarks are limited in scale and scope, failing to capture the complexities of MLLM lifelong unlearning. To fill this gap, we introduce the MLUBench, a large-scale and comprehensive benchmark featuring 127 entities across 9 classes under lifelong unlearning requests. We perform extensive experiments using MLUBench and reveal that existing unlearning methods suffer from severe, cumulative degradation. More critically, we further identify the unique challenge of this problem: unlike in unimodal models, MLLM lifelong unlearning is constrained by the need to preserve multimodal alignment. Continually unlearning from one modality could degrade the entire model. To alleviate this challenge, we propose LUMoE, an effective method. Experiments demonstrate that LUMoE significantly mitigates the degradation problem faced by baselines. The source code and the MLUBench dataset are open-sourced in https://github.com/lihe-maxsize/Lifelong_Unlearning_main.

Visual instruction tuning effectively adapts a pre-trained Large Language Model (LLM) to process image information alongside text. Yet, it remains unclear how visual features are embedded into the layer-wise hierarchy of abstractions of the LLM backbone. Across a diverse set of vision-language architectures, we show that instruction tuning primarily serves as a bridge, embedding visual features directly into the intermediate semantic layers of the LLM, bypassing the early layers devoted to unimodal processing. With probing analyses and causal interventions, we show that these intermediate layers are the semantic core of vision-language processing and play a critical role in the performance on a broad set of multimodal benchmarks. In addition, by comparing the geometry of semantically equivalent visual and textual representations, we find that fine-tuning extends and strengthens the existing abstraction phase, aligning visual features with pre-existing textual ones. Finally, we confirm the functional role of this localized alignment by restricting fine-tuning to intermediate layers alone: this strategy preserves the performance of full fine-tuning on vision-centric benchmarks while reducing training time. Our results suggest that multimodal integration is a localized phenomenon driven by the repurposing of the internal abstraction engine of the LLM.

Industrial anomaly detection has historically been a unimodal task. Recent multimodal vision-language models have produced systems that admit textual input alongside the image and are presented as enabling text-guided zero- and few-shot inspection. Yet these methods are evaluated with protocols inherited from unimodal benchmarks that hold the textual condition constant and therefore cannot measure whether language conditions the decision; whether reported gains reflect text guidance or strong pretrained visual features remains open. We introduce Text-Guided Anomaly Detection (TGAD), a structured benchmark that progressively increases the functional role of language across three scenarios: a controlled prompt-sensitivity setting on MVTec AD; a component-tagged extension of MVTec AD that requires the model to restrict its assessment to an instructed part; and the new Assembled Panel Dataset (APD), a realistic industrial setting that requires both defect-type and component-location knowledge. We evaluate one representative model per paradigm: generative large vision-language, training-free discriminative, and embedding-adaptive discriminative. In all three, the textual interface conditions the decision only superficially: prompt content is absorbed unless the object noun is removed (the generative model's I-AUROC drops from 97.4 to 82.6); component-level instructions do not constrain the decision once defects outside the instructed part are admitted as normal (from 90.3 to 66.3); and when both combine on APD, image-level discrimination collapses below the MVTec level, in one case below chance (71.2, 50.5, 31.5). These results suggest that standard benchmarks overstate the text-guided capabilities of current multimodal anomaly detection systems, and that a protocol of this kind is a prerequisite for models that can be reliably controlled through language for industrial deployment.

Clinical diagnosis often requires combining imaging with physiological measurements, yet deployed models typically operate on unimodal data. We present PaCX-MAE, a cross-modal distillation framework that injects physiological priors into chest X-ray (CXR) encoders while remaining strictly unimodal at inference. PaCX-MAE augments in-domain masked autoencoding with a dual contrastive-predictive objective, aligning CXR representations with paired ECG and laboratory embeddings. Extensive evaluation across nine benchmarks demonstrates consistent improvements over domain-specific MAE, particularly on physiology-dependent tasks (e.g., +2.7 AUROC on MedMod; +6.5 F1 on VinDr). The method proves highly label-efficient in the 1% regime and preserves anatomical fidelity, achieving parity with MAE on segmentation tasks. Zero-shot and attention analyses confirm that PaCX-MAE successfully learns to attend to physiological indicators, such as the cardiac silhouette, absent in standard visual pretraining.

Recent progress in task-optimized neural networks has established encoding models as a powerful tool for predicting brain responses to naturalistic stimuli, yet most existing approaches rely on unimodal representations. The emergence of omni-modal foundation models and rich multimodal neural datasets enables encoding models that jointly integrate visual, auditory, and linguistic information across subjects. We introduce MIRAGE, a brain encoding framework for predicting whole-brain fMRI responses to naturalistic audiovisual stimuli. MIRAGE achieves state-of-the-art performance via a native multimodal backbone and adaptive feature gating across layers. These representations are then combined with a transformer-based brain encoder and a subject-specific linear head over the cortical parcels. Controlled comparisons show that natively multimodal features consistently outperform post-hoc aggregation of independent unimodal features, across architectural levels and backbones. Beyond predictive accuracy, the learned attention weights are directly inspectable to interpret the modality-specific gating profile over the backbone, and each modality traces a distinct anatomical pattern across cortex. Together, these results propose adaptive layer-wise aggregation of natively multimodal features as a generalizable, interpretable, and accurate approach for whole-brain encoding.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) map complex visual inputs to semantic spaces, but interpreting the cross-modal reasoning of VLMs currently relies on post-hoc explainers evaluated via unimodal perturbation metrics. We expose a limitation in this paradigm: because multimodal datasets contain language priors and modality biases, VLMs frequently exhibit cross-modal redundancy, allowing them to answer visual queries using text alone. Consequently, unimodal metrics penalize faithful explainers, triggering an evaluation collapse where visual and textual rankings fundamentally contradict each other. %(Kendall's $τ= -0.06$). To resolve this, we introduce Synergistic Faithfulness ($\mathcal{F}_{syn}$), a scalable metric rooted in the Shapley Interaction Index that strictly isolates the joint Harsanyi dividend between modalities, serving as a highly accurate surrogate ($ρ= 0.92$) while achieving a $24\times$ computational speedup. Evaluating 8 distinct XAI methods across 3 VLM architectures and 3 benchmark datasets, reveals that explainers proposed for VLMs heavily over-index on visual salience and significantly underperform adapted attention-based methods in capturing true cross-modal synergy. By decoupling visual plausibility from cross-modal faithfulness, this work provides a rigorous evaluation framework required to safely audit VLM reasoning in high-stakes deployments.

We study contextual dynamic pricing in a semiparametric scalar-index valuation model where the latent value is $v_t=μ_\ast(\mathsf c_t)+ξ_t$, with an unknown utility map $μ_\ast$ and an unknown additive noise distribution. The key decision object is the one-dimensional oracle price map $u\mapsto p^\ast(u)$ induced by the scalar index $u=μ_\ast(\mathsf c)$ and the noise tail. Under the $β$-Hölder smoothness of the tail function for $β\geq 2$ and a revenue-geometry condition that gives a unique, stable, interior maximizer, this oracle map is itself $(β-1)$-smooth. We exploit such structure through $\mathsf{ORBIT}$, a modular coarse-to-fine policy that takes a scalar pilot index as input, localizes a benchmark price in each active bin, and learns a local polynomial approximation of the oracle map inside a trust region via bandit convex optimization. For the baseline linear utility model $μ_\ast(\mathsf c)=\mathsf c^\topθ_\ast$, an adaptive elliptical exploration scheme constructs the required scalar pilot online without distributional assumptions on the contexts. The resulting policy achieves regret $\widetilde{O}\big(T^{\frac{2β-1}{4β-3}}+\sqrt{dT}\big)$. For fixed $d$, we establish a matching lower bound in the horizon dependence, unveiling that the nonparametric oracle-map learning term is minimax sharp. The same scalar-pilot interface also yields extensions to sparse high-dimensional linear utility and nonparametric Hölder utility.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have facilitated Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output (MSMO), wherein systems generate concise textual summaries accompanied by salient visuals from multimodal sources. However, current MSMO evaluation remains fragmented: text quality, image-text alignment, and visual diversity are typically assessed in isolation using unimodal metrics, making it difficult to capture whether the modalities jointly support a faithful and useful summary. To address this gap, we introduce MM-Eval, a unified evaluation framework that integrates assessments of textual quality, cross-modal alignment, and visual diversity. MM-Eval comprises three components: (1) text quality, measured using OpenFActScore for factual consistency and G-Eval for coherence, fluency, and relevance; (2) image-text relevance, evaluated via an MLLM-as-a-judge approach; and (3) image-set diversity, quantified using Truncated CLIP Entropy. We calibrate MM-Eval through a learned aggregation model trained on the mLLM-EVAL news benchmark, aligning component contributions with human preferences. Our analysis reveals a text-dominant hierarchy in this setting, where factual consistency acts as a critical determinant of perceived overall quality, while visual relevance and diversity provide complementary signals. MM-Eval improves over heuristic aggregation baselines and provides an interpretable, reference-weak framework for comparative evaluation of multimodal summaries.

We provide counterexamples to the unimodal minimal filling architecture conjecture for polynomial neural networks (PNNs) with power activation functions. Fixing the input and output widths, the conjecture states that any minimal filling architecture has unimodal widths for the hidden layers. We found counterexamples via a frontier search, recursive dimension bounds on neurovarieties, and symbolic computation. Notably, several subarchitectures of our main example exhibit large defect, in contrast with the predominantly small-defect behavior observed in prior literature.

Machine unlearning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is required for compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), yet current evaluation practices are inconsistent. We present the first systematic study of metric reliability in multimodal unlearning. Five standard metrics, Forget Accuracy (FA), Retain Accuracy (RA), Membership Inference Attack (MIA), Activation Distance (AD), and JS divergence (JS), yield conflicting method rankings across three VQA benchmarks (MLLMU-Bench, UnLOK-VQA, MMUBench). Kendall tau analysis over 36 unlearned LLaVA-1.5-7B models reveals two opposing clusters, {FA, RA, MIA} and {AD, JS}, with tau_FA_AD = -0.26, reproduced on BLIP-2 OPT-2.7B. Agreement is lower in multimodal VQA (average tau = 0.086) than in unimodal classification (average tau = 0.158; difference = 0.072), indicating that dual image-and-text pathways amplify inconsistency. We introduce the Unified Quality Score (UQS), a composite metric with weights derived from each metric's Spearman correlation with the oracle distance d(M_hat, M_star), where M_star is the oracle model retrained only on the retain set. RA shows the strongest reliability (rho = 0.484, p = 0.003), while FA is negatively correlated (rho = -0.418, p = 0.011). UQS yields stable rankings under 100 random weight perturbations (tau = 0.647 +- 0.262). We release the benchmark, 36 checkpoints, and an interactive leaderboard. Code and pre-computed results are available at https://github.com/neurips26/UnifiedUnl.

SignSGD compresses each stochastic gradient coordinate to a single bit, offering substantial memory and communication savings, but its 1-bit quantization removes magnitude information and is known to leave a generalization gap relative to well-tuned SGD. We revisit SignSGD from a 1-bit quantization and dithering perspective and contribute three improvements. First, we derive a small-batch convergence rate for SignSGD under unimodal symmetric gradient noise using a signal-to-noise weighted stationarity measure, removing the large-batch assumption of prior analyses. Second, we inject annealed Gaussian noise before the sign operator, which acts as a classical dithering mechanism and probabilistically restores magnitude information lost to hard thresholding. Third, we adapt the SWATS strategy to sign-based updates with a projection-based learning-rate calibration that smoothly transitions from SignSGD to SGD. Single-worker experiments on ResNet-18 isolate optimizer effects from communication aspects: pre-sign dithering surpasses Adam on CIFAR-100, and the calibrated switch reaches 92.18% test accuracy on CIFAR-10, outperforming both pure SGD 91.38% and pure SignSGD with momentum 90.82%.

Early and accurate glaucoma detection is critical to prevent irreversible vision loss, yet existing AI methods often rely on unimodal inputs and lack interpretability. We present GlaBoost, a multimodal gradient boosting framework that unifies three complementary signals for glaucoma risk prediction: fundus image embeddings from a pretrained convolutional encoder,free-text neuroretinal rim assessments encoded by a transformer-based language model, and structured ophthalmic biomarkers. These modalities are fused into a single representation and classified by an enhanced XGBoost model.On two real-world annotated datasets, GlaBoost consistently outperforms unimodal and generic multimodal baselines. Feature importance analysis highlights the cup-to-disc ratio, rim thinning, and the ISNT rule as the dominant predictors, yielding clinically consistent and interpretable decisions. GlaBoost offers a transparent and scalable foundation for multimodal decision support in ophthalmology.

Current methods for multimodal medical image classification (M3IC) face two major challenges. First, the prevailing "fusion after unimodal image embedding" paradigm cannot fully exploit the complementary and correlated information in the multimodal data. Second, the scarcity of labeled multimodal medical images, coupled with their substantial domain shift from natural images, impedes the use of cutting-edge Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) for medical image embedding. To jointly address the challenges, we propose a novel Early Intervention (EI) framework. Treating one modality as target and the rest as reference, EI harnesses high-level semantic tokens from the reference as intervention tokens to steer the target modality's embedding process at an early stage. For parameter-efficient VFM adaptation, we introduce Mixture of varied-rank LoRAs (MoR), which employs a small set of LoRA experts with distinct ranks and a bypass-allowed router. Extensive experiments on three public datasets, covering retinal disease recognition, skin lesion recognition, and knee anomaly classification, verify the effectiveness of the proposed method against a number of competitive baselines.