cs.ROMar 9, 2026

POIROT: Investigating Direct Tangible vs. Digitally Mediated Interaction and Attitude Moderation in Multi-party Murder Mystery Games

Authors: Wen Chen, Rongxi Chen, Shankai Chen, Huiyang Gong, Minghui Guo, Yingri Xu, Xintong Wu, Xinyi Fu

Organizations: Tsinghua University Beijing, China · University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, USA · Syracuse University Syracuse, USA · National University of Singapore Singapore, Singapore · 

Abstract

As social robots take on increasingly complex roles like game masters (GMs) in multi-party games, the expectation that physicality universally enhances user experience remains debated. This study challenges the "one-size-fits-all" view of tangible interaction by identifying a critical boundary condition: users' Negative Attitudes towards Robots (NARS). In a between-subjects experiment (N = 67), a custom-built robot GM facilitated a multi-party murder mystery game (MMG) by delivering clues either through direct tangible interaction or a digitally mediated interface. Baseline multivariate analysis (MANOVA) showed no significant main effect of delivery modality, confirming that tangibility alone does not guarantee superior engagement. However, primary analysis using multilevel linear models (MLM) revealed a reliable moderation: participants high in NARS experienced markedly lower narrative immersion under tangible delivery, whereas those with low NARS scores showed no such decrement. Qualitative findings further illuminate this divergence: tangibility provides novelty and engagement for some but imposes excessive proxemic friction for anxious users, for whom the digital interface acts as a protective social buffer. These results advance a conditional model of HRI and emphasize the necessity for adaptive systems that can tailor interaction modalities to user predispositions.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables11 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 18, 2026

When Should Robots Intervene? Balancing Engagement and Intrusiveness in Human-Robot Interaction

Designing effective Human-Robot Interaction in task-oriented settings requires carefully balancing user engagement with socially acceptable levels of robot intrusiveness. In this paper, we examine how different robot intervention strategies shape user experience, interaction dynamics, perceived intrusiveness, and sense of support. We compare two approaches: a continuous engagement-seeking robot strategy, and a context-aware strategy that selectively intervenes based on the user's state and task context. Both approaches rely on multimodal behavioral cues, including body orientation and attentional signals, to guide robot actions. We evaluate these strategies in a user study with 32 participants performing a task in a simulated hospital environment. Our findings show that higher interaction frequency does not necessarily lead to better engagement. Instead, we observe a systematic trade-off between perceived support and intrusiveness, influenced by factors such as physical proximity and user effort. These results provide empirical evidence that effective engagement in HRI depends on adaptive, context-sensitive intervention policies.
Sep 18, 2026

Understanding Engagement and Intrusiveness in Assistive Human-Robot Interaction Using Individual Traits

Robot assistance is particularly crucial in unfamiliar tasks, where users must understand task requirements while coordinating with the robot. Previous research offers mixed evidence on the role of robot proxemics in user engagement: some studies suggest closer proximity enhances interaction, while others report it can feel intrusive. In this work, we argue that perceptions of intrusiveness depend not only on proxemics but also on the frequency of robot interventions, and are strongly influenced by individual traits such as personality and demographics. We conducted an experiment with 32 participants who interacted with two assistive robots that provided similar task support but differed in their intervention strategies. Results indicate that overall engagement remains stable across conditions, yet affective responses and perceived intrusiveness vary significantly with personality traits. Moreover, personality shapes interaction dynamics differently depending on the robot's behavior. These findings emphasize that effective human-robot interaction should account for individual differences, tailoring robot behavior to maintain engagement while respecting each user's unique affective and behavioral profile.
May 13, 2026

Exploring Human-Robot Collaboration: Analysis of Interaction Modalities in Challenging Tasks

This work compares three interaction modalities for human-robot collaboration: passive, reactive, and proactive. We studied 18 participants assembling a seven-layer colored tower from memory while using nearby and distant blocks. In the passive modality participants worked alone; in the reactive modality a mobile robot helped only upon request; in the proactive modality it initiated brick delivery and error signaling without explicit requests. Although robot assistance increased completion time, most participants preferred collaboration: 67% preferred proactive behavior and 78% judged it most useful. These results suggest that timely proactive support can improve user experience in controlled collaborative tasks.