Context Engineering: From Prompts to Corporate Multi-Agent Architecture

Vera V. Vishnyakova

cs.AIMar 10, 2026

Context Engineering: From Prompts to Corporate Multi-Agent Architecture

Authors: Vera V. Vishnyakova

Organizations: Director, Center for Transfer and Management of Socio-Economic Information, HSE University, Moscow

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems evolve from stateless chatbots to autonomous multi-step agents, prompt engineering (PE), the discipline of crafting individual queries, proves necessary but insufficient. This paper introduces context engineering (CE) as a standalone discipline concerned with designing, structuring, and managing the entire informational environment in which an AI agent makes decisions. Drawing on vendor architectures (Google ADK, Anthropic, LangChain), current academic work (ACE framework, Google DeepMind's intelligent delegation), enterprise research (Deloitte, 2026; KPMG, 2026), and the author's experience building a multi-agent system, the paper proposes five context quality criteria: relevance, sufficiency, isolation, economy, and provenance, and frames context as the agent's operating system. Two higher-order disciplines follow. Intent engineering (IE) encodes organizational goals, values, and trade-off hierarchies into agent infrastructure. Specification engineering (SE) creates a machine-readable corpus of corporate policies and standards enabling autonomous operation of multi-agent systems at scale. Together these four disciplines form a cumulative pyramid maturity model of agent engineering, in which each level subsumes the previous one as a necessary foundation. Enterprise data reveals a gap: while 75% of enterprises plan agentic AI deployment within two years (Deloitte, 2026), deployment has surged and retreated as organizations confront scaling complexity (KPMG, 2026). The Klarna case illustrates a dual deficit, contextual and intentional. Whoever controls the agent's context controls its behavior; whoever controls its intent controls its strategy; whoever controls its specifications controls its scale.

Explore similar work

Apr 5, 2026

Context Engineering: A Practitioner Methodology for Structured Human-AI Collaboration

The quality of AI-generated output is often attributed to prompting technique, but extensive empirical observation suggests that context completeness may be more strongly associated with output quality. This paper introduces Context Engineering, a structured methodology for assembling, declaring, and sequencing the complete informational payload that accompanies a prompt to an AI tool. Context Engineering defines a five-role context package structure (Authority, Exemplar, Constraint, Rubric, Metadata), applies a staged four-phase pipeline (Reviewer to Design to Builder to Auditor), and applies formal models from reliability engineering and information theory as post hoc interpretive lenses on context quality. In an observational study of 200 documented interactions across four AI tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Cowork, Codex), incomplete context was associated with 72% of iteration cycles. Structured context assembly was associated with a reduction from 3.8 to 2.0 average iteration cycles per task and an improvement in first-pass acceptance from 32% to 55%. Among structured interactions, 110 of 200 were accepted on first pass compared with 16 of 50 baseline interactions; when iteration was permitted, the final success rate reached 91.5% (183 of 200). These results are observational and reflect a single-operator dataset without controlled comparison. Preliminary corroboration is provided by a companion production automation system with eleven operating lanes and 2,132 classified tickets.

Elias Calboreanu

Swift North AI Lab, The Swift Group, LLC, Maryland, USA.

LLM Context Management Human-AI Collaboration Prompt Engineering

Ask PDF

Jul 15, 2026

AI Agents Do Not Fail Alone:The Context Fails First

Context engineering has become central to building reliable AI agents, yet it remains largely unmeasured. Agents do not fail in isolation: their behavior is shaped by the instructions, tools, memory, retrieved knowledge, guardrails, and untrusted inputs accumulated in their context. When this context is weak, agents drift, hallucinate, misuse tools, ignore constraints, become vulnerable to injection, and waste tokens. This paper validates context-engineering quality as an independent leading indicator of agent reliability. We implement the measurement in ProofAgent-Harness, an open-source infrastructure for AI agent evaluation that uses multi-juror, consensus-based scoring. The harness assesses context across seven criteria: role clarity, guardrail coverage, instruction consistency, tool schema quality, grounding sufficiency, injection hardening, and token efficiency. Crucially, the context score is isolated from behavioral metrics and release decisions, enabling a non-circular validation. Through a controlled context-quality study across regulated agent domains, holding frontier LLM agents fixed and varying only their operating context, we show that context-quality criteria consistently predict their corresponding behavioral outcomes. Grounding sufficiency predicts hallucination resistance, guardrail coverage predicts manipulation resistance, instruction consistency predicts instruction following, and tool-schema quality predicts tool use. These findings establish context measurement as a validated preflight signal for agent reliability and position context engineering as an auditable layer of agent evaluation and governance.

Fouad Bousetouane

The University of Chicago, USA

AI Agent Reliability Agent Reliability AI Agent Evaluation LLM Context Management

Ask PDF

Mar 23, 2026

A Context Engineering Framework for Improving Enterprise AI Agents based on Digital-Twin MDP

Despite rapid progress in AI agents for enterprise automation and decision-making, their real-world deployment and further performance gains remain constrained by limited data quality and quantity, complex real-world reasoning demands, difficulties with self-play, and the lack of reliable feedback signals. To address these challenges, we propose a lightweight, model-agnostic framework for improving LLM-based enterprise agents via offline reinforcement learning (RL). The proposed Context Engineering via DT-MDP (DT-MDP-CE) framework comprises three key components: (1) A Digital-Twin Markov Decision Process (DT-MDP), which abstracts the agent's reasoning behavior as a finite MDP; (2) A robust contrastive inverse RL, which, armed with the DT-MDP, to efficiently estimate a well-founded reward function and induces policies from mixed-quality offline trajectories; and (3) RL-guided context engineering, which uses the policy obtained from the integrated process of (1) and (2), to improve the agent's decision-making behavior. As a case study, we apply the framework to a representative task in the enterprise-oriented domain of IT automation. Extensive experimental results demonstrate consistent and significant improvements over baseline agents across a wide range of evaluation settings, suggesting that the framework can generalize to other agents sharing similar characteristics in enterprise environments.

Xi Yang, Aurelie Lozano, Naoki Abe +6

IBM Software Innovation Lab, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA

LLM Agents LLM Agent Training RL for LLM Agents Reinforcement Learning Offline RL

Ask PDF