The Future of AI is Many, Not One

Daniel J. Singer; Luca Garzino Demo

cs.AIMar 30, 2026

The Future of AI is Many, Not One

Authors: Daniel J. Singer, Luca Garzino Demo

Organizations: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Philosophy and Wharton Legal Studies & Business Ethics · University of Pennsylvania, Department of Philosophy

Abstract

The way we're thinking about generative AI right now is fundamentally individual. We see this not just in how users interact with models but also in how models are built, how they're benchmarked, and how commercial and research strategies using AI are defined. We argue that we should abandon this approach if we're hoping for AI to support groundbreaking innovation and scientific discovery. Drawing on research and formal results in complex systems, organizational behavior, and philosophy of science, we show why we should expect deep intellectual breakthroughs to come from epistemically diverse groups of AI agents working together rather than singular superintelligent agents. Having a diverse team broadens the search for solutions, delays premature consensus, and allows for the pursuit of unconventional approaches. Developing diverse AI teams also addresses AI critics' concerns that current models are constrained by past data and lack the creative insight required for innovation. The upshot, we argue, is that the future of transformative transformer-based AI is fundamentally many, not one.

AI Agents for Scientific Discovery

AI agents for scientific discovery use language models, tools, and experiments to generate, test, and refine scientific knowledge.

See all 287 papers

Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity
May 18, 2026Tiancheng Hu, Yixuan Jiang, Haotian Li +5Multi-Agent LLM Systems Multi-Agent Collaboration
Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9DA, United Kingdom. · Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. · The Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School, May University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1AG, United Kingdom. +4
Human diversity fuels collective creativity that large language models cannot simulate or sustain
Jul 29, 2026Mengchen Dong, Hiromu YakuraComputational Creativity Diverse Text Generation
Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
Stronger artificial intelligence breakthroughs hasten their own exhaustion
Oct 19, 2026Beichen Lu, Honglin Bao, Qi Huang +2
School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. · Knowledge Lab, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. · Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. +2

May 18, 2026J/K move · Enter open · S save

Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity

Tiancheng Hu, Yixuan Jiang, Haotian Li, José Hernández-Orallo+4

Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9DA, United Kingdom. · Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. · The Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School, May University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1AG, United Kingdom.+4

Multi-Agent LLM Systems Multi-Agent Collaboration Computational Creativity

Open paper AskPDF arXiv

Although artificial intelligence (AI) now matches or exceeds human performance across numerous cognitive tasks, creativity remains a highly contested frontier. As AI systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in research and innovation, it is essential to understand and augment their creativity. Here we demonstrate that multi-agent LLM teams not only surpass single agents, but also substantially outperform human teams in creativity (Cohen's d=1.50) across 4,541 multi-agent LLM ideas and 341 human-team ideas on six diverse problem-solving tasks. This advantage is driven by novelty while maintaining comparable usefulness. To investigate the generative processes in both groups, we represent conversations as paths through semantic space using neural language model representations. Both LLM and human teams produce more creative ideas when conversations range widely rather than staying centered on a single theme (low global coherence). However, the additional patterns that predict creativity differ: LLM teams benefit from efficient exploration (high semantic spread, shorter paths), while human teams benefit from maintaining smooth conversational flow (high local coherence, frequent pivots). Additionally, we identify model choice and discussion structure as orthogonal design levers that together explain 26.8% of variance in LLM conversational dynamics, paving the way for systematic approaches to developing multi-agent systems with augmented creative capabilities.

Abstract

AI Agents for Scientific Discovery

Explore similar work

Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity

Human diversity fuels collective creativity that large language models cannot simulate or sustain

Stronger artificial intelligence breakthroughs hasten their own exhaustion