While deep learning has significantly advanced accident anticipation, the robustness of these safety-critical systems against real-world perturbations remains a major challenge. We reveal that state-of-the-art models like CRASH, despite their high performance, exhibit significant instability in predictions and latent representations when faced with minor input perturbations, posing serious reliability risks. To address this, we introduce SECURE - Stable Early Collision Understanding Robust Embeddings, a framework that formally defines and enforces model robustness. SECURE is founded on four key attributes: consistency and stability in both prediction space and latent feature space. We propose a principled training methodology that fine-tunes a baseline model using a multi-objective loss, which minimizes divergence from a reference model and penalizes sensitivity to adversarial perturbations. Experiments on DAD and CCD datasets demonstrate that our approach not only significantly enhances robustness against various perturbations but also improves performance on clean data, achieving new state-of-the-art results.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The CRASH model exhibits significant output differences between clean and perturbed inputs.
Figure 2: Overall framework of SECURE.
Model
DAD [ 3 ]
CCD [ 1 ]
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
DSA [ 3 ]
48.1
1.34
99.6
4.53
L-RAI [ 25 ]
51.4
3.01
98.9
3.32
AdaLEA [ 18 ]
62.3
2.94
99.2
3.45
DSTA [ 9 ]
59.2
2.60
98.8
4.53
UString [ 1 ]
58.0
2.85
99.5
4.52
Table 1: Comparison of model performance on the complete datasets. Bold and underlined values represent the best and second-best performance in each category.
Model / Dataset
Clean
IP (0.1)
IP (0.2)
LP (0.1)
LP (0.2)
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
CRASH (DAD)
67.21
3.020
65.83
3.053
63.37
2.964
64.41
2.984
44.73
3.119
SECURE (DAD)
68.67
3.127
68.42
3.120
68.32
3.062
68.19
3.083
57.61
3.207
CRASH (CCD)
99.53
4.554
99.29
4.540
99.17
3.965
98.88
3.074
69.26
3.413
SECURE (CCD)
99.73
4.583
99.67
4.483
99.48
4.481
99.29
3.191
81.45
3.430
Table 2: Comparison of CRASH and SECURE on DAD and CCD datasets under different perturbations. The number in the parentheses is the standard deviation of Gaussian noise.
LTask
LCps
LSpd
LClm
LSld
AP(%) ↑
mTTA(s) ↑
✓
×
×
×
×
63.37
2.964
✓
✓
×
×
×
63.47
3.036
✓
✓
✓
×
×
64.80
3.015
✓
✓
✓
✓
×
65.29
3.001
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
68.32
3.062
Table 3: Ablation Results of SECURE on the DAD Dataset under IP (0.2)
Traffic accident anticipation predicts imminent collisions or rising crash risk early enough to support driver warnings and proactive road-safety decisions.
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used for scene understanding in autonomous driving, but robustness analysis often relies on task-agnostic embedding stability alone. We study whether corruption-induced embedding drift predicts changes in a task-aligned hazard score derived from CLIP image-text similarities. Using controlled corruptions on BDD100K road scenes, we compare embedding drift against margin drift, defined as the change in hazard score under perturbation. The relationship is highly corruption-dependent: some families exhibit strong coupling between representation drift and decision drift, while others induce hazardous decision instability despite relatively modest embedding change. Furthermore, corruption families differ in failure direction: most suppress hazard detections via false negatives, while occlusion instead triggers false alarms, suggesting that benchmark design should account for asymmetric failure modes, not just overall instability rates. These results suggest that robustness benchmarks should include task-aligned stability measures in addition to embedding-level perturbation statistics.
Everett Richards
Department of Computer Science, San Diego State University.
The robustness of trajectory prediction models is crucial for developing safe autonomous driving systems. Adversarial attacks on trajectory prediction can significantly impair the accuracy of predicted trajectories, leading to hazardous driving behaviors. While heuristic defense strategies have been implemented to enhance the robustness of trajectory prediction models, these measures often fail against more sophisticated, targeted adversarial attacks. Hence, there is a pressing need to establish verifiable safety assurances for trajectory prediction models. In this paper, we extend the traditional Randomized Smoothing framework to "TrajRS", which provides a certified robust radius for smoothed trajectory predictors. We clarify and expand the formal definitions of robustness in trajectory prediction and tailor the practical TrajRS scheme specifically to "robustness for the optimal prediction" and "robustness for all possible predictions". An extensive set of experiments demonstrates that TrajRS effectively achieves robustness certification for all smoothed pedestrian trajectory predictors in this work.
Liang Zhang, Gaojie Jin, Yao Shi +4
Key Laboratory of System Software (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China · Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS, China +1
Accurate and robust trajectory prediction is essential for safe and efficient autonomous driving, yet recent work has shown that even state-of-the-art prediction models are highly vulnerable to inputs being mildly perturbed by adversarial attacks. Although model vulnerabilities to such attacks have been studied, work on effective countermeasures remains limited. In this work, we develop and evaluate a new defense mechanism for trajectory prediction models based on randomized smoothing -- an approach previously applied successfully in other domains. We evaluate its ability to improve model robustness through a series of experiments that test different strategies of randomized smoothing. We show that our approach can consistently improve prediction robustness of multiple base trajectory prediction models in various datasets without compromising accuracy in non-adversarial settings. Our results demonstrate that randomized smoothing offers a simple and computationally inexpensive technique for mitigating adversarial attacks in trajectory prediction.
Julian F. Schumann, Eduardo Figueiredo, Frederik Baymler Mathiesen +3
Department of Cognitive Robotics, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands · Delft Center for Systems and Control, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands