eess.IVApr 19, 2026

VIDS: A Verified Imaging Dataset Standard for Medical AI

Authors: Joan S. Muthu, John Shalen

Organizations: Princeton Medical Systems

Abstract

Medical imaging AI development is fundamentally dependent on annotated datasets, yet no existing standard provides machine-enforceable validation across dataset structure, annotation provenance, quality documentation, and ML readiness within a single framework. DICOM standardizes image acquisition, storage, and communication at the individual study level. BIDS organizes neuroimaging research datasets with consistent naming conventions. Neither addresses the curation layer, viz., who annotated what, when, with what tool, and to what quality standard. This paper presents VIDS (Verified Imaging Dataset Standard), an open specification that defines folder layout, file naming, annotation provenance schemas, quality documentation, and 21 machine-enforceable validation rules across two compliance profiles. VIDS uses NIfTI as a canonical working format while preserving full DICOM metadata in sidecars for traceability, and supports export to any downstream ML framework (nnU-Net, MONAI, COCO, flat NIfTI) without loss of provenance. Twenty-two compliance dimensions are defined and four major public datasets -- LIDC-IDRI, BraTS, CheXpert, and the Medical Segmentation Decathlon -- are benchmarked against these dimensions. Even widely used datasets satisfy only 20--39% of these dimensions, with provenance and quality documentation as the largest systematic gaps. LIDC-Hybrid-100 is released as a 100-subject VIDS-compliant reference CT dataset with consensus segmentation masks from four radiologist annotations (mean pairwise Dice 0.7765), validating 21/21 on the Full compliance profile. VIDS is fully open source: the specification is CC BY 4.0, all tools are Apache 2.0, the reference validator is available on PyPI (pip install vids-validator), and LIDC-Hybrid-100 is published on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19582717).

Explore similar work

CardsList
Date pendingcs.CV

Solve the Missing First Step: Can VLMs Standardize Raw Heterogeneous Medical Data?

As vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to medical AI, existing benchmarks mainly focus on evaluating their diagnostic ability over given medical images and texts, implicitly assuming that standardized medical images, texts, or question-answer pairs are already prepared. However, this assumption does not hold when we apply VLMs in real clinical practice, where medical data is often raw, heterogeneous, and fragmented across different sources. In this paper, we study this missing step, i.e., raw medical data standardization. Specifically, models are given raw dataset folders and evaluated on their ability to identify source formats, convert raw medical images into VLM-compatible visual inputs, extract relevant textual information, and organize the results into structured image-text pairs. To construct this Medical Data Standardization Benchmark (MDS-Bench), we manually annotate 1,939 raw medical data standardization tasks covering diverse clinical practice, radiology modalities, annotation formats, and directory layouts. Extensive experiments show that even the best performing VLM, i.e., Gemini 3 Flash, achieves only a 48.6% end-to-end success rate. Our research highlights raw medical data standardization as a critical bottleneck for medical AI diagnosis in real practice.
Xin Chen, Dongliang Xu, Cunhao Zhu +5
Diagnostic BenchmarkMultimodal Clinical DataMultimodal BenchmarksMedical Imaging
AskPDF
Jul 28, 2026cs.CV

Forensic Reproducibility Audit of a Radiology Vision-Language Model Benchmark: From Intended Protocol to Released Artifact

Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases. Agreement across these artifacts is usually assumed rather than tested. We performed a retrospective forensic reproducibility audit of a preserved chest-radiograph vision-language model (VLM) pilot; no model was called again and no image or report was newly annotated. We traced prompt bindings, DICOM metadata, output completeness, label extraction, matched analyses, and release propagation. Of 300 planned model-prompt calls, 297 yielded nonempty reports. Sixty Claude calls labeled A/B were executed with the same C prompt. The 30 studies represented 28 patients. Four MONOCHROME1 images were rendered without required polarity inversion, dataset split membership was not retained, and the unvalidated extractor truncated five reports to 4000 characters. Reconstructing one common cohort of 369 complete case-finding blocks changed Cochran's Q from 154.73 to 182.29. Of 45 McNemar comparisons, 27 had unadjusted p < 0.05 and 20 remained below 0.05 after Holm adjustment. These values describe only the archived automated-label matrix; they do not recover the intended prompt comparison or establish clinical performance. We withdraw the original performance, ranking, prompt-effect, and clinical claims and specify machine-verifiable controls for cohort, DICOM rendering, prompt and model identity, call status, annotation provenance, keyed analysis, and derived artifacts.
Mateusz Kozłowski
Medical Vision-Language ModelsDiagnostic BenchmarkMultimodal BenchmarksAlgorithm AuditingClinicalProtocol
AskPDF
Sep 15, 2026cs.CV

IMVS: Interactive Medical Volume Segmentation with Test-Time Adaptation - A New Method for Annotating Radiology Datasets

Annotating large radiology datasets is bottlenecked by the manual effort of delineating structures slice-by-slice in 3D volumes. Interactive methods reduce this effort but stay interaction-inefficient: slice-wise methods (including many foundation models) ignore inter-slice continuity, while 3D and video-based methods propagate a prompt with a \emph{fixed} propagator that never adapts to the target volume, so it drifts on low-contrast or pathological structures and must be re-prompted. We present IMVS, a human-in-the-loop annotation framework that composes three components into a closed loop rather than a new segmentation primitive: a lightweight 2D Slice Mask Adapter (SMA) fine-tuned online from user scribbles, a frozen Volume Mask Tracker (VMT) that propagates corrected masks across adjacent slices, and a soft teacher--student alignment that limits forgetting. The SMA is backbone-agnostic (UNet++, DeepLabV3, TransUNet). Across 8 public CT/MRI datasets, IMVS matches strong interactive baselines in quality while sharply cutting annotation effort: 14.4×14.4\times faster than a proficient copy-based manual workflow (22.3×22.3\times over naive manual), 4.6×4.6\times over slice-wise and 1.9×1.9\times over 3D interactive methods. MedSAM2 and ScribblePrompt stay competitive or stronger on well-delineated organs; IMVS's advantage is largest on challenging targets and on interaction efficiency. Source code and Demo Video: https://github.com/AbhilakshSinghReen/imvs.
Abhilaksh Singh Reen, Kushal Borkar, Ritvik Mahapatra
Medical Imaging DatasetsHuman-In-The-Loop3D Object Understanding
AskPDF