Can a visually plausible food mesh be trusted to estimate the volume of consumed food? \method investigates this question using selected paired before- and after-consumption states from the MetaFood CVPR 2026 Continuous 3D Reconstruction While Eating Challenge. The submitted workflow follows a curated reconstruction protocol: SAM3 segments the food and plate regions; Hunyuan3D/SAM3D generates a dimensionless food mesh; the plate diameter provides the metric scale; the plate geometry is removed in Blender; and the remaining mesh is hole-filled, made watertight, and integrated to estimate volume. MoGe-2 is used only as an auxiliary cue for initial dish-diameter estimation when direct plate measurement is uncertain; it is not the primary scale source for the reported challenge result. \method ranks first, with an average Chamfer distance of 8.31 across 34 meshes using rigid ICP without scale correction. On 17 before- and after-pairs, it achieves 33.87% state-level volume MAPE and zero monotonicity violations, while consumed-volume MAPE remains 53.74%. The results show that surface reconstruction, metric scale, controlled mesh cleanup, watertight volume integration, and physical depletion consistency should be evaluated separately for dietary assessment. Source code and evaluation scripts will be available at \href{https://github.com/GCVCG/PerBite-CVPR-MetaFood-2026}{github.com/GCVCG/PerBite-CVPR-MetaFood-2026}.
Accurate volume and surface area estimation is critical for diverse applications, from marine ecology to medical diagnostics. However, existing methods often suffer from high computational costs and poor performance with sparse and noisy data. We propose a fully feed-forward framework that regresses scale-normalized volume and surface area and their associated uncertainties directly from multi-view images. By fusing 3D point cloud reconstructions with view-aligned 2D features through a graph-based decoder, our model bypasses iterative optimization, ensuring exceptional scalability and rapid inference. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods, particularly when operating with a low number of input images. Validated across coral monitoring, dietary analysis, and anthropometry, our proposed framework provides a robust, adaptable solution for quantitative shape analysis. This architecture provides a high-speed, scalable alternative for precise geometric estimation from visual data, maintaining high performance even in resource-constrained or sparse-view scenarios.
Feed-forward 3D reconstruction models output a per-pixel confidence that is used by downstream systems as an uncertainty signal. The confidence is trained to serve as a weight in the training loss of models. Whether the confidence can be used as an uncertainty magnitude has not been measured. We audit seven backbones on 13 datasets and score the confidence on four properties, i.e., ranking of error, ratio of error to uncertainty on average, slope of this ratio across the confidence range, and coverage of the implied error distribution. Although the confidence ranks error quite well, the uncertainty decoded from the confidence is too small compared to the actual error. The uncertainty has the right size only under the exact training conditions. The median case is off by at least 2.4x across all seven models, while the uncertainty is further off the more confident the model is. Our work shows that the overconfidence appears on unseen scenes even when the model reaches its loss's optimum. As a post-hoc repair we fit a power law on the confidence with two constants per backbone--dataset pair. The repair brings all four audited properties to target at the dataset level, while leaving ranking untouched. Fitted with the target dataset held out, the constants bring the median case from 2.4x off to 1.35x. The repair does not hold below the dataset level, where two-thirds of held-out scenes are still more than five points off in coverage. We attribute what the repair cannot reach to the model, which carries neither the scale of the error nor the shape of its distribution across predictions. We release the audit protocol, its results, and the fitted constants per backbone-dataset pair.
Learned image matching has experienced significant progress in recent years, culminating in robust and accurate matchers such as RoMa, whose robustness is often attributed to its use of frozen DINO features. In a parallel development, feed-forward reconstruction models, such as VGGT, have been trained on ever-growing datasets to accurately regress dense 3D point maps and camera poses. The distinction between matchers and feed-forward reconstruction models has become increasingly blurred with the introduction of matching losses in models such as MASt3R and VGGT-Ω. This raises a natural question: what do feed-forward 3D models know about image matching? In this work, we answer this question by analyzing three scenarios: (i) zero-shot matching of patch features, (ii) direct matching of 3D point predictions, and (iii) training a full matcher on top of the learned representations. We find that, despite performing poorly in zero-shot matching, especially in later layers, feed-forward reconstruction models provide strong representations for linear probing and full matching pipelines. We further show that, even without any training, their raw predictions alone enable competitive matching, albeit only under moderate viewpoint changes and modality gaps. Based on these insights, we retrain RoMa v2 by replacing its DINO backbone with VGGT-Ω. Our resulting model, \ours, outperforms state-of-the-art matchers on a wide range of benchmarks, e.g. +8.1 mAA compared to RoMa v2 on WxBS.