Abstract
A mobile phone vibrating on a hard surface often sounds qualitatively unlike ordinary audiovisual recordings when reproduced through laptop loudspeakers. We propose that part of this perceptual distinctiveness can be described as a nested periodicity: a first-order cepstral structure reflecting the vibration period and its multiples, and a second-order cepstral structure reflecting repeated spacing within the first-order cepstrum. Treating the perceptual effect as real and using a deliberately transparent synthetic signal chain, we model six stages: mechanical generation, surface and air propagation, microphone capture, encoding and decoding, laptop-speaker playback, and re-recording or post-processing. The synthetic analysis shows that the first-order cepstral periodicity is preserved across the chain, whereas a cleaner bimodal or quasi-bimodal second-order cepstral signature is most evident at the mechanical source and at laptop-speaker playback. The result supports, but does not prove, the hypothesis that laptop reproduction can re-emphasize a latent contact-vibration periodicity that is less cleanly expressed in intermediate recorded and encoded forms. We frame second-order cepstral bimodality as an exploratory descriptor of contact-vibration playback rather than as a completed perceptual metric. Required validation includes recordings of real devices, controlled playback transfer functions, perceptual judgments, and comparisons against ordinary speech, music, and environmental recordings.
Explore similar work
Apr 29, 2026cs.CV
Optical vibration sensing enables recovering the scene sound directly from the surface vibration of nearby objects, turning everyday objects into ``visual microphones''. However, most prior methods had focused on capturing the vibrations of specific objects with highly favorable vibration responses. These include objects where the surface vibrations are generated by the object itself (e.g., speaker membrane or guitar body) or objects consisting of a thin membrane which is highly reactive to sound (e.g., a chip bag or the leaf of a plant). In this paper, we tackle sound recovery for a more challenging class of solid objects whose vibration responses are poor or highly resonant. We simultaneously capture vibrations for multiple surface points on the object using a speckle-based vibrometry imaging system. Then, we derive a novel physics-guided vibration formation model that relates the scene sound source to the captured multi-point multi-axis vibrations via the object's vibrational modes. The model is then used to reverse the resonant transfer function of the vibrating object, fusing multiple vibration signals to estimate the original sound source in the scene. We evaluate our approach by recovering sound from a variety of everyday objects, demonstrating that it significantly outperforms traditional single-point speckle vibrometry in challenging scenarios and other signal-processing-based methods for multi-signal fusing.
Shai Bagon, Matan Kichler, Mark Sheinin
Jun 15, 2026eess.AS
It is well known that intelligibility of speech reduces in the presence of ambient noise. However, studies show that all sounds are not affected uniformly (or equally) and that vowels are more robust to noise than consonants. In this study, intelligibility of various consonants is assessed and analyzed in stationary white noise and non-stationary babble noise conditions. Specifically, this study investigates the individual contribution of magnitude and phase spectra of a given speech signal on human speech recognition of consonants in noisy conditions. In this regard, three experiments are carried out. In experiment 1, clean signal, signal reconstructed with only magnitude spectrum information (magnitude only signal) and signal reconstructed with only phase spectrum information (phase only signal) are assessed for intelligibility. In experiment 2, noise is added to clean speech. From noisy speech, phase only signal and magnitude only signal are reconstructed and intelligibility tests are performed for all these three signals. In experiment 3, noise is added directly to the magnitude only and phase only signals reconstructed from clean speech and their intelligibility is assessed. Results of these experiments show that magnitude spectrum contributes more to intelligibility in clean condition than phase spectrum, while information from phase spectrum is more robust in noisy conditions. It is also observed that, among consonants, nasals are more susceptible to noise whereas fricatives and approximants were observed to be comparatively more robust.
Bhanu Teja Nellore, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, Rohit Kumar +2
Jul 5, 2026cs.SD
This paper explains the principles and provides examples of a new method for distinguishing between FAKE human speech synthesized by generative AI and natural speech. Since synthetic speech is generated based on information from a limited set of training spectra, the variety of vowels - which are key to identifying individuals - is limited. In contrast, natural speech exhibits a more diverse distribution of vowel spectra due to the flexibility of the human articulatory organ. In this paper, using Japanese - a Syllabary limited to five vowel phonemes, each of which corresponds one-to-one with a specific sound - as an example, we outline a method for distinguishing between synthetic and natural speech reading the same text by analyzing the spectral distributions. If we normalize the spectra of speech sounds and regard them as probability density functions for the frequency bands received by the hair cells of the human cochlea, and evaluate the distance between spectra using the Wasserstein metric, the Wasserstein distances between the vowels of synthetic speech are short. By preserving this distance and performing a topological mapping using persistent homology, the spectral probability density functions of synthetic and natural speech can be decomposed into clusters.
Yusei Tamura, Shigekazu Ishihara, Ken Ito