RESOLVE: A Multi-Resolution and Multi-Modal Dataset for Roadside Cooperative Perception

We describe a Camera and LiDAR fusion detector developed for the TUMTraf V2X cooperative 3D object detection track of the DriveX 2026 challenge. The detector fuses three roadside cameras with a fused infrastructure-plus-vehicle point cloud in a shared bird's-eye-view space and predicts boxes through a CenterPoint-style head with a generalized IoU regression loss and an IoU quality re-ranking head. Trained on the provided train and validation splits, the model reaches a 3D mAP of 0.85 on the public Codabench test split. While iterating on the system, we observed that 44 of the 50 test frames are also present in the released train (40) and validation (4) splits with their labels. We therefore conducted two additional studies to quantify how this overlap affects the final score: (1) a finetuning run that oversamples the 44 overlapping frames, reaching 0.89 mAP, and (2) a post-processing run that replaces predictions on those frames with the released ground truth, reaching 0.99 mAP (uploaded to our Codabench account for testing but not published on the leaderboard). All three configurations and their per-class results are reported.

Reliable roadside perception of vulnerable road users (VRUs) remains challenging under occlusions, variable lighting, and diverse weather conditions, particularly under strict edge-computing and latency constraints. Existing multi-sensor fusion systems rely on cloud or server-grade infrastructure, creating a deployment gap at real-world intersections. We present CLIFE, an edge-native camera-LiDAR fusion framework that integrates targetless online calibration and lightweight late-fusion tracking entirely on a single embedded device, without cloud offloading. CLIFE adaptively refines camera-LiDAR alignment on demand and performs multi-sensor fusion and track association with O(N log N) per-frame cost. We deploy CLIFE across 12 signalized intersections in Chattanooga and conduct an in-depth evaluation at a representative intersection using synchronized camera-LiDAR data that spans diverse daytime, nighttime, and weather conditions. Our experiments demonstrate that the fusion architecture substantially enhances the perceptual range and robustness of the individual sensors under varied environmental and traffic conditions. The late-fusion core operates at 53.2 FPS on the Jetson AGX Thor, ensuring high throughput for real-time intersection-scale applications. By centering perception at the edge, CLIFE provides a deployable foundation for downstream safety applications, while reducing bandwidth and calibration overhead for agencies operating multi-intersection corridors.

LiDAR model selection is a critical issue in roadside sensing systems, as it directly determines both perception capability and deployment cost. However, the lack of empirical benchmarks for comparing perception performance across different LiDAR configurations has greatly constrained scientific sensor selection and deployment planning. To address this gap, we present MR-LiDAR, a controlled multi-resolution LiDAR benchmark for roadside perception diagnostics. Using 16-, 32-, 80-, and 128-beam LiDARs in identical roadside scenarios, we collect point clouds and ground-truth annotations for diverse traffic participants, including vehicles and vulnerable road users (VRUs), across varying distances. This controlled design isolates intrinsic LiDAR specifications, particularly beam count and beam distribution, as the key variables for precise performance diagnostics. Based on MR-LiDAR, we conduct systematic empirical analyses to examine how beam count, beam distribution, target distance, object category, and vehicle occlusion affect LiDAR perception performance. The results reveal that all of these factors have substantial impacts. In particular, contrary to the common assumption that higher beam counts always yield better perception, we show that an 80-beam LiDAR with optimized beam distribution can match or even outperform a 128-beam LiDAR with uniform beam distribution. In addition, we provide a practical reference guide for LiDAR selection, including target point-count statistics and detection performance comparisons based on two widely used detection algorithms. This work offers a diagnostic benchmark and practical guidance for determining cost-effective LiDAR configurations in roadside perception applications.