cs.CVJul 7, 2026

Benchmarking the Robustness of Autonomous Driving to Environmental Illusions: A Lane Perception Perspective

Authors: Tianyuan Zhang, Xianglong Liu, Aishan Liu, Lu Wang, Yitong Zhang, Peng Yue, Mingchuan Zhang, Siyuan Liang, +1 more

Abstract

Environmental illusions (eg., shadows, reflections, and tire marks) are naturally existing yet overlooked phenomena in real-world driving environments. They can disturb visual perception, leading to misinterpretation of the scene and posing serious safety risks to autonomous driving (AD) systems. However, existing researches largely overlook these phenomena, leaving a critical gap. To address this issue, we study AD robustness through the lane perception perspective, a fundamental task supporting core functions like cruise control and lane centering. We focus on two representative models: conventional lane detection (LD) and vision-language model-based systems (ADVLMs). In this work, we introduce the first benchmark, LanEvil++, for evaluating the robustness of lane perception under environmental illusions. LanEvil++ encompasses 14 types of illusions and leverages the CARLA simulator to generate 94 high-fidelity, fully controllable 3D scenes, yielding a dataset of 90,292 annotated images, 1,596 video clips, and 41,855 visual question answering pairs. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that environmental illusions substantially degrade the performance of state-of-the-art LD methods. On average, LD models experience a 5.27% drop in Accuracy and a 10.49% decline in F1-score, while ADVLMs show a 2.03% reduction in GPT-score and a 0.75% drop in Language-score. Among all illusions, shadows emerge as the most disruptive factor, reducing accuracy by up to 7.20%. Furthermore, closed-loop simulations reveal that these illusions can lead to incorrect driving decisions. Complementary real-world case studies highlight safety-critical failures in actual traffic scenes. To enhance robustness, we propose the Multimodal Illusion Defense Approach (MIDA). MIDA achieves substantial gains under challenging conditions, boosting robustness by 4.23% on LD models and 3.82% on ADVLMs.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 26, 2026cs.AI

ObsDriveBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Understanding under Adverse Weather with Observability Awareness

Autonomous driving under adverse weather remains a critical challenge, yet existing vision-language benchmarks mainly evaluate under standard conditions, synthetic corruptions, or single modality. As a result, it remains unclear how vision-language models behave under real-world adverse weather with multi-modal inputs. We argue that a key difficulty lies in degraded environmental observability: under fog, rain, snow, and low illumination, multi-modal observations become unreliable and cross-modally inconsistent, posing challenges to scene understanding, and subsequent decision-making. To study this, we introduce \textbf{ObsDriveBench}, a real-world multi-modal benchmark for adverse-weather autonomous driving. Our benchmark is designed with three capability dimensions: \textbf{observability awareness}, \textbf{spatial reliability}, and \textbf{risk-aware decision-making}, enabling fine-grained diagnosis of model behavior under degraded observations. We construct the benchmark through observability meta-annotation, scene description, and capability oriented multiple-choice tasks over synchronized camera, LiDAR, and radar inputs, forming a benchmark with over 14k training and 13k test questions. Experiments reveal consistent performance degradation of existing vision-language models. We further introduce \textbf{ObsDrive} model with normal-weather supervised fine-tuning and adverse-weather reinforcement learning, improving robustness across all three capabilities. The dataset and evaluation code will be released at \href{https://github.com/russellyq/ObsDriveBench}{\texttt{ObsDriveBench}}.
Qiao Yan, Yihan Wang, Zhenghao Xing +2
Autonomous DrivingMultimodal BenchmarksPartial ObservabilityPrecipitation
AskPDF
Jul 6, 2026cs.SE

Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems

Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) must operate reliably under diverse conditions, yet representative data for rare or adverse scenarios is difficult to obtain. Perturbation-based testing is widely used to assess robustness, but most studies focus on offline datasets or simulation, leaving open questions about how such results translate to real-world driving. We present a large-scale study of 72 camera and LiDAR perturbations, evaluated across three testing modalities: offline model-level analysis, hardware-in-the-loop execution, and closed-loop system-level testing on a full-scale autonomous vehicle. The study covers both an end-to-end vision-based driving model and a modular LiDAR-based perception and planning stack. Our results reveal a clear gap between testing levels. For camera-based systems, perturbations with limited offline impact can still induce unstable control and failures in real-world driving. For LiDAR-based systems, degradation is more consistent at the perception level but weakly predictive of system-level failures. Across both modalities, model-level metrics alone are insufficient to identify the most harmful perturbations. We further show that real-time feasibility is a key constraint in real-world testing, and that robustness observations obtained from recorded data do not consistently transfer to closed-loop behavior on a physical vehicle, highlighting the importance of complementary real-world, system-level evaluation.
Stefano Carlo Lambertenghi, Matthias Weil, Andrea Stocco
Autonomous DrivingLidarCamera
AskPDF
May 18, 2026cs.RO

Bench2Drive-Robust: Benchmarking Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving under Deployment Perturbations

Robustness is a critical requirement for deploying autonomous driving systems in the real world. Existing robustness benchmarks for autonomous driving have made important progress in studying the effects of image-level corruptions, such as adverse weather or camera degradation, on perception modules and open-loop planning outputs. However, deployment can also involve system-level imperfections, such as inference latency and ego-state estimation errors, which remain less studied in closed-loop E2E-AD evaluation. These imperfections can accumulate through the feedback loop and destabilize control. In this work, we present Bench2Drive-Robust, to our knowledge the first device-centric robustness benchmark for closed-loop end-to-end autonomous driving under realistic deployment perturbations. We systematically evaluate deployment-oriented perturbations arising from three major sources: camera-stream failures (frame drop, partial observation), ego-state estimation errors (GPS noise, and speed or odometry errors), and compute-induced control delay (model inference delay). We evaluate representative end-to-end driving methods and analyze their robustness under different perturbation severities. Our results show that these deployment-related perturbations can substantially degrade closed-loop driving performance, revealing robustness challenges that are not fully captured by conventional image-level corruption evaluations. By establishing a closed-loop evaluation protocol and demonstrating the substantial impact of these deployment-oriented perturbations, Bench2Drive-Robust defines practical robustness problems for end-to-end autonomous driving and encourages further research on deployment-aware robust driving systems.
Zhiyuan Zhang, Zhenghao Jin, Yanlun Peng +8
Autonomous Driving SimulationAutonomous DrivingAutonomous Hard Drive DisassemblyClosed LoopState EstimationCamera
AskPDF