cs.CVJul 8, 2026

Geometric Collapse: When Vision Models Fail to Verify Physical Causality

Authors: Wentao ZhangJinhu QiWeiqiang JinYifei ZhangChan-Tong LamIrwin King

Organizations: Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao SAR, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China · AgentecFusion Limited · School of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China · School of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

Abstract

Recent progress in large-scale self-supervised learning has improved dense geometric prediction, but it remains unclear whether such scaling yields inference-time physical plausibility checks. We propose Scrambled Edges, a controlled counterfactual that injects salient edge-like cues while violating surface continuity, illumination coherence, and occlusion ordering. With energy-matched and structure-matched controls, we isolate the effect of unsupported edge evidence from high-frequency energy and edge sparsity. Across CNN/ViT/SSL depth predictors on NYU Depth v2 and KITTI, Scrambled Edges induce up to 3.2x larger deviation from clean predictions than energy-matched noise; additional diffusion and flow-matching depth estimators show attenuated but still significant collapse. The resulting Geometric Collapse propagates globally: even with oracle knowledge of the corrupted region, output-level repair recovers only 47%, with substantial error outside the mask. These findings provide controlled behavioral evidence that current dense predictors lack reliable mechanisms to quarantine physically unsupported edge cues, motivating explicit plausibility scoring and selective cue integration.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. GEOPHYS: The Geometry of Physical Plausibility

    Jun 15, 2026Christian Internò, Alexander Pondaven, Habon Issa +8Physical PlausibilityGeological Semantic Understanding