Lingjing: A Simulation Testbed for Multi-Agent Embodied Tasks in Open-Ended Cities

Recent LLM-based multi-agent urban simulators can generate semantically rich city routines, but they remain costly to scale and are often weakly validated against empirical mobility patterns. We present CityBehavEx, an interactive LLM-assisted urban simulation platform that scales to city-size populations, exposes agent behavior for inspection, supports empirical validation, and generates mobility patterns that better match real-world spatial, temporal, and semantic distributions. Instead of invoking large language models for every agent action, CityBehavEx combines established human mobility models with fine-tuned cross-encoders that estimate semantic alignment between agent profiles, schedules, and activity transitions. This design enables large-scale simulations, as demonstrated in a case study of 100,000 agents over 75 days in under one hour on a single consumer GPU. The platform allows users to define simulation regions, launch experiments, inspect trajectories and activity traces, debug unrealistic behaviors, and validate generated routines against real-world mobility, time-use, and semantic metrics.

LLM-agent simulation faces a joint grounding and scaling problem: agents should act in environments that reflect real urban constraints, yet direct online LLM calls for city-scale populations are computationally prohibitive. We present GenWorld, an empirically grounded urban simulation infrastructure that combines a building-level synthetic city, a structured agent-environment interface, and offline compilation of LLM-derived decision signals into lookup policies for scalable rollout. In a reference instantiation for Higashihiroshima, Japan, GenWorld grounds 196,608 synthetic residents in census and geospatial data, validates demographic consistency against census tabulations, and uses YJMob100K mobile-phone data as a commuting-distance diagnostic. We demonstrate the infrastructure through three reproducible cases: a full-city weekday rollout, a weekday-weekend behavioral contrast, and a warning-response perturbation with auditable replanning traces. These cases support GenWorld as a reproducible platform for grounded and scalable LLM-agent studies, while calibrated forecasting for traffic, evacuation, or policy outcomes remains future work.

As language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, they must coordinate with others over long horizons in open-ended interactive tasks. Yet existing evaluations rarely test these demands together, instead emphasising single-agent tasks, short interactions, or highly structured multi-agent settings. We introduce $alem$, a JAX-based benchmark for open-ended multi-agent coordination built on Craftax-like dynamics. Alem embeds procedurally generated coordination tasks, soft specialisation, communication, and controllable coordination difficulty into a long-horizon survival world with exploration, crafting, trading, and combat. We evaluate $13$ modern LLMs zero-shot within homogeneous teams, with trained MARL agents as reference points. Current LLM agents remain far from solving alem, averaging only ~6% normalised return, but their failures are not uniform. On the hardest coordination setting, zero-shot Gemini-3.1-Pro-High approaches MARL agents trained for one billion steps, while GPT-5.4-High achieves strong base-task reward but much lower coordination reward. This contrast shows that individual task competence does not imply coordination competence. Ablations show that communication is the largest contributor to coordination, while memory and reasoning help when used to maintain multi-step plans. Overall, our results identify coordination as a distinct bottleneck for frontier LLM agents, separate from single-agent capabilities. Alem makes this bottleneck measurable and provides a controlled testbed for developing agents that communicate, allocate roles, and execute shared plans. Code is available at https://github.com/alem-world/alem-env.