Organizations: Biological and Life Sciences Division, MBZUAI, UAE · Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK · OATML, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, UK · Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
Clinical diagnosis relies on consistent multimodal data collected from the same patient throughout the disease course, yet such data are difficult to acquire at scale because of collection costs, missing modalities, fragmented systems, and longitudinal follow-ups. Existing synthetic-data approaches largely focus on individual modalities or vision-language dual modalities at report-level generation. Little work has been done to construct synthetic data with consistent patient backgrounds, coherent disease trajectories, and interrelated modality-specific evidence at a complete clinical case level. We introduce CaseWeaver, a multi-agent framework built around a timeline-anchored Latent Clinical Case Graph (LCCG). The LCCG organizes patient context, latent disease states, clinical events, and expected observations in a shared patient-level representation. Modality-agents use scoped observation subgraphs and clinical protocols to generate evidence including clinical records, laboratory results, physiological signals, and medical images. We evaluate clinical inferability using a calibrated AgentClinic protocol and case diversity using Virtual Case Diversity (VCD) score. CaseWeaver outperformed general-model and agentic-workflow baselines on both metrics, producing more diverse and coherent multimodal virtual clinical cases.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of CaseWeaver. (a) Construction of a target-disease-specific LCCG. (b) Generation of multimodal evidence by modality-specific agents. (c) Example of a multimodal virtual clinical case.
Figure 2: Protocol-driven multimodal evidence rendering. The Imaging Agent–Angiography Tool workflow is shown as an example. The tool selects the target coronary anatomy according to task requirements and applies the LCA_LAO_CAUDAL (LAO 40∘ , CAUDAL 30∘ ) and RCA_LAO_CRANIAL (LAO 40∘ , CRANIAL 20∘ ) acquisition protocols.
Figure 3: (a) Empirical cumulative distributions of CII, information coverage C , and the diagnostic success–coverage gap G in the calibration and validation sets; red dashed lines denote the calibration thresholds or reference interval. (b) Joint distribution of the diagnostic success rate S and information coverage C .
Method
Clinical Inferability
VCD
S↑
C↑
CII ↑
G
MI ↑
Diabetes ↑
Colorectal ↑
Average ↑
gpt-5.6-terra
0.828
0.787
0.803
0.041
0.210
0.215
0.369
0.265
gemini-3.5-flash
0.822
0.789
0.796
0.032
0.250
0.390
0.265
0.302
OpenAI Agents SDK (gpt-5.6-terra)
0.752
0.821
0.769
−0.069
0.262
0.283
0.370
0.305
Google ADK (gemini-3.5-flash)
0.805
0.780
0.783
0.025
0.300
0.432
0.324
0.352
CaseWeaver
0.930
0.803
0.860
0.127
0.547
0.620
0.686
0.618
Table 1: Comparison of clinical inferability and VCD across virtual case generation methods.
Building effective clinical decision support systems requires the synthesis of complex heterogeneous multimodal data. Such modalities include temporal electronic health records data, medical images, radiology reports, and clinical notes. Large language model (LLM)-based agents have shown impressive performance in various healthcare tasks, especially those involving textual modalities. Considering the fragmentation of healthcare data across hospital systems, collaborative agent frameworks present a promising direction to mitigate data sharing challenges. However, the effectiveness of LLM agents for multimodal clinical risk prediction remains largely unexamined. In this work, we conduct a systematic evaluation of LLM-based agents for clinical prediction tasks using large-scale real-world data. We assess performance in unimodal and multimodal settings and quantify performance gaps between single agent and multi-agent systems. Our findings highlight that single agent frameworks outperform naive multi-agent systems, are better at handling multimodal data, and are better calibrated. This underscores a critical need for improving multi-agent collaboration to better handle heterogeneous inputs. By open-sourcing our code and evaluation framework, this work offers a new benchmark to support future developments relating to agentic systems in healthcare.
Large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems have shown promise for clinical decision support, but existing works largely assume that evidence has already been curated and handed to the model. Real-world clinical workflows instead require agents to actively seek, iteratively plan, and synthesize multimodal evidence from heterogeneous sources. In this paper, we introduce ClinSeekAgent, an automated agentic framework for dynamic multimodal evidence seeking that shifts the paradigm from passive evidence consumption to active evidence acquisition. Given a clinical task and access to raw patient data, ClinSeekAgent queries longitudinal EHR records and invokes imaging analysis tools when relevant; refines its hypotheses as new information emerges; and integrates the collected evidence into grounded clinical decisions. We validate ClinSeekAgent in two roles: as an inference-time agent for frontier LLMs and as a training pipeline for open-source models. For inference-time validation, we construct ClinSeek-Bench, which covers 13 text-only EHR task categories and 6 multimodal EHR--chest X-ray task categories, and pairs each question with both a Curated Input of pre-selected evidence and the raw patient data for automated evidence seeking. Without any benchmark-specific curation, ClinSeekAgent significantly outperforms curated input for both Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol, improving overall F1 from 66.5 to 68.8 and from 60.0 to 62.5 on multimodal tasks. The ablations show that the performance gain come from multi-round evidence seeking rather than from access to more of the patient record. For training-time validation, we fine-tune Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on ClinSeekAgent trajectories generated by GPT-5.6 Sol. The resulting ClinSeek-35B-A3B reaches 35.6 average F1 on AgentEHR-Bench, outperforming all evaluated open-source models, including ones more than ten times larger, as well as Claude Opus 5.
While interpretable prototype networks offer compelling case-based reasoning for clinical diagnostics, their raw continuous outputs lack the semantic structure required for medical documentation. Bridging this gap via standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) routinely triggers ``retrieval sycophancy,'' where Large Language Models (LLMs) hallucinate post-hoc rationalizations to align with visual predictions. We introduce ProtoMedAgent, a framework that formalizes multimodal clinical reporting as an iterative, zero-gradient test-time optimization problem over a strict neuro-symbolic bottleneck. Operating on a frozen prototype backbone, we distill latent visual and tabular features into a discrete semantic memory. Online generation is strictly constrained by exact set-theoretic differentials and a reflective Scribe-Critic loop, mathematically precluding unsupported narrative claims. To safely bound data disclosure, we introduce a semantic privacy gate governed by k-anonymity and ℓ-diversity. Evaluated on a 4,160-patient clinical cohort, ProtoMedAgent achieves 91.2% Comparison Set Faithfulness where it fundamentally outperforms standard RAG (46.2%). ProtoMedAgent additionally leverages a binding ℓ-diversity phase transition to systematically reduce artifact-level membership inference risks by an absolute 9.8%.