Benchmarking Dexterity of Multifingered Robot Hands: A Review and Perspective

Dexterity is a central yet ambiguously defined concept in the design and evaluation of anthropomorphic robotic hands. In practice, the term is often used inconsistently, with different systems evaluated under disparate criteria, making meaningful comparisons across designs difficult. This highlights the need for a unified, performance-based definition of dexterity grounded in measurable outcomes rather than proxy metrics. In this work, we introduce POMDAR, a comprehensive dexterity benchmark that formalizes dexterity as task performance across a structured set of manipulation and grasping motions. The benchmark was systematically derived from established taxonomies in human motor control. It is implemented in both real-world and simulation and includes four manipulation configurations: vertical and horizontal configurations, continuous rotation, and pure grasping. The task designs contain mechanical scaffolding to constrain task motion, suppress compensatory strategies, and enable metrics to be measured unambiguously. We define a quantitative scoring metric combining task correctness and execution speed, effectively measuring dexterity as throughput. This enables objective, reproducible, and interpretable evaluation across different hand designs. POMDAR provides an open-source, standardized, and taxonomy-grounded benchmark for consistent comparison and evaluation of anthropomorphic robot hands to facilitate a systematic advancement of dexterous manipulation platforms. CAD, simulation files, and evaluation videos are publicly available at https://srl-ethz.github.io/POMDAR/.

Human manipulation skills represent a pinnacle of voluntary motor functions, requiring the coordination of many degrees of freedom and the processing of high-dimensional sensor input to achieve remarkable dexterity. Thus, this study investigates whether the human hand, with its associated biomechanical properties, sensors, and control mechanisms, is an ideal that should be strived for in robotics. Do robots need anthropomorphic hands? First, characteristics of the human hand in terms of biomechanics and perception are extracted to compare them with currently commercially available robotic hands. From this comparison, research questions are derived that connect manipulation system complexity to skill repertoire size and dexterity. These questions are addressed through a systematic literature review, analyzing the manipulation capabilities demonstrated in 125 papers published between 2019 and 2025. Although complex five-fingered hands are often considered the ultimate goal for robotic manipulators, they are not necessary for all tasks. Findings indicate that in-hand manipulation does not benefit from anthropomorphic hand design, as simpler mechanisms are sufficient; however, mechanism complexity correlates with the breadth of manipulation tasks a hand can perform. Sensor integration and intelligent manipulation strategies remain underexplored, which may be due to a misalignment with hand design: instead of replicating the number of fingers and degrees of freedom, focusing on robustness and softness would allow more intelligent control and learning to exploit environmental contacts and integrate more sensors. Finally, the article argues for standardized evaluation criteria to enable the systematic comparison of hand designs and manipulation systems.

Robotic dexterous hands are central to contact-rich manipulation, with rapid progress driven by advances in hardware, sensing, control, simulation, and data generation. However, existing studies are often developed under different assumptions regarding hand embodiments, sensory configurations, task settings, training data, and evaluation protocols, making systematic comparison difficult and obscuring the developmental trajectory of the field. This survey provides a holistic review of dexterous hand research from four complementary aspects. First, we present a hardware-level analysis covering actuation, transmission, perception, and representative hand designs, highlighting the key trade-offs in force capability, compliance, bandwidth, integration, and system complexity. Furthermore, we review control and learning methods for dexterous manipulation from a methodological perspective, grouping representative works by major paradigms and tracing their evolution in chronological order. In addition, we consolidate datasets, modality design, and evaluation practices, which enables methodological progress to be interpreted together with the ways in which it is trained, benchmarked, and assessed. Finally, we discuss the major limitations of current dexterous hand research and summarize the corresponding future directions. By connecting hardware analysis, methodological development, data resources, and evaluation, this survey aims to provide a structured understanding of dexterous hand research and to clarify the most important open challenges for future study.