Organizations: Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States · Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States · Department of Computer and Data Science, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States · IBM Research Labs, IBM Research, Haifa University Campus, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498825, Israel · Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States
Background: Large volumes of unlabeled knee MRI scans are available across repositories but remain insufficiently leveraged. We developed KneePreM, a knee-specific 3D self-supervised model, and evaluated transfer and label efficiency for classification and segmentation. Methods: A 3D U-Net masked autoencoder was pretrained on 19,011 unlabeled Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) MRI series from 4,791 participants. Downstream fine-tuning used full and reduced training sets for fastMRI+ two-label classification (1,172 examinations), Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy (APM) eight-target classification (1,716 examinations), SKM-TEA segmentation (155 examinations), and APM segmentation (25 examinations). Baselines were random initialization and SuPreM. Deployment workflow was implemented with a Model Context Protocol interface. Evaluation metrics included balanced accuracy, F1 score, ROC AUC, PR AUC, and Dice score. Statistical analysis used bootstrap confidence intervals and paired bootstrap tests for classification and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for segmentation. Results: KneePreM achieved higher full-data macro ROC AUC than both baselines for fastMRI+ and APM (all p < .001). For fastMRI+ classification, KneePreM achieved a ROC AUC of 0.722 using 50% of the training data, exceeding both full-data baselines. In APM classification, KneePreM reached a ROC AUC of 0.740 with 70% of the data, matching the full-data random baseline and outperforming SuPreM. For SKM-TEA segmentation, its 70%-data Dice of 0.838 exceeded the full-data random baseline (0.835) and both same-budget comparators. In APM segmentation, its 75%-data Dice of 0.746 exceeded the full-data random baseline (0.731) and both same-budget comparators. Conclusion: KneePreM improves transfer performance and label efficiency across knee MRI classification and segmentation tasks, particularly when labeled training data are limited.
School of Electronic Engineering, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland · Bioengineering and Computing Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy · Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy +4
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA · Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA · Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA +1
Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 USA · Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180 USA