SCORE-LM: State-Space Radar Representations with Language Models for Fault Diagnosis

Cameras and LiDAR degrade in rain, fog, and snow, while millimeter-wave radar remains largely unaffected. We align a radar encoder to frozen SigLIP vision embeddings and decode structured scene captions through a frozen vision-language model (VLM) with approximately 7M trainable parameters. On K-RADAR with held-out fog, light snow, and heavy snow sequences, all radar configurations outperform a camera baseline that collapses to over 90% hallucination. We identify a token-norm mismatch as the dominant failure mode when bridging radar to a frozen VLM and show that projector-output LayerNorm resolves it. Analysis of encoder complexity, caption format, and pooling strategy reveals tradeoffs that inform future radar-VLM pipeline design.

Automotive mmWave radar can develop vibration, antenna misalignment, radome blockage, and receive-channel degradation that corrupt the signal before perception begins. Data for these faults are scarce because each condition must be induced and measured on physical hardware. We introduce Rad-R, a raw-ADC dataset captured with a 4-chip 77GHz TI MMWCAS-RF-EVM cascade (192 virtual channels). Unlike existing raw-radar datasets, Rad-R pairs each recording with a controlled hardware fault at a calibrated severity, an independent physical severity measurement, and frame-synchronised IMU, temperature, GPS, and camera streams. Rad-R is a single-session dataset, so our generalisation claims are confined to a controlled cross-severity protocol in which train and test use physically distinct captures. A reproducible benchmark evaluates seven representative vision backbones and the proposed raw-IQ Mamba SSM (RadrNet) under within-clip, chirp-wise anytime, few-shot cross-capture, and controlled cross-severity protocols. Within-clip performance is near-saturated ($>0.98$ macro-F1), whereas cross-severity generalisation remains difficult: the absolute-phase RadrNet-DS falls to $0.49$ macro-F1. RadrNet-DS-CI replaces absolute phase with per-frame-standardised magnitude and relative chirp-to-chirp phase and ranks first on the controlled benchmark ($0.663$ vs. $0.628$ for the strongest RD-CNN; three seeds); the RadrNet family also leads on the anytime and few-shot budgets. A descriptive cross-modal analysis further finds that radar micro-Doppler covaries with independently measured IMU vibration energy (pooled Spearman $ρ=0.41$ across conditions). The complete dataset and code will be released publicly under permissive licences.

Vision-language models for autonomous driving primarily rely on cameras and LiDAR, leaving 4D radar largely unexplored as a standalone perceptual modality despite its robustness to adverse visibility and direct measurement of radial velocity. We introduce Radar4D-VLM, a radar-only temporal vision-language model that reasons from ten consecutive 4D-radar point-cloud sweeps without camera or LiDAR input. Radar4D-VLM extracts geometrically grounded object proposals and organizes radar evidence into a compact hierarchy of object, scene, and kinematic tokens. A parameter-efficient projector maps these tokens into frozen language backbones, while auditable prediction heads jointly model object count, spatial distribution, motion state, collision risk, semantic category, and radial velocity. Radar4D-VLM combines proposal-grounded temporal object tokenization, global scene context, and explicit kinematic tokens within a unified frozen-backbone interface. On sequence-isolated K-Radar development validation, its Top-64 proposal recall reaches 98.13% at 4 m, exceeding fixed-lattice and uniform-random controls by 6.40 and 22.83 percentage points, respectively. We further evaluate 24 matched runs spanning eight frozen Qwen, Phi, Mistral, Llama, and Gemma backbones under an identical adaptation budget. The radar-token interface remains compatible across all five language-model families, while matched aligned, permuted, and no-language controls show sensor dependence but no stable direct-head gain from aligned language supervision. These results establish a reproducible foundation for radar-only multimodal scene and motion reasoning while separating interface compatibility from the benefit of language supervision.