Persistent LLM Orchestration of Heterogeneous Robot Teams via Partial Delegation to Multi-Agent Protocols

Multi-robot task planning requires decomposing natural-language instructions into executable actions for heterogeneous robot teams. Conventional Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) planners provide rigorous guarantees but struggle to handle ambiguous or long-horizon missions, while large language models (LLMs) can interpret instructions and propose plans but may hallucinate or produce infeasible actions. We present a hierarchical multi-agent LLM-based planner with prompt optimization: an upper layer decomposes tasks and assigns them to lower-layer agents, which generate PDDL problems solved by a classical planner. When plans fail, the system applies TextGrad-inspired textual-gradient updates to optimize each agent's prompt and thereby improve planning accuracy. In addition, meta-prompts are learned and shared across agents within the same layer, enabling efficient prompt optimization in multi-agent settings. On the MAT-THOR benchmark, our planner achieves success rates of 0.95 on compound tasks, 0.84 on complex tasks, and 0.60 on vague tasks, improving over the previous state-of-the-art LaMMA-P by 2, 7, and 15 percentage points respectively. An ablation study shows that the hierarchical structure, prompt optimization, and meta-prompt sharing contribute roughly +59, +37, and +4 percentage points to the overall success rate.

This paper presents a framework to prompt multi-robot teams with high-level tasks using natural language expressions. Our objective is to use the reasoning capabilities of language models in understanding and decomposing multi-robot collaboration and decision-making tasks, but in settings where such models cannot be called at deployment time. However, it is hard to specify the behavior of an individual robot from a team instruction, and have it continuously adapt to actions from other robots. This necessitates a framework with the representational capacity required by the logic and semantics of a task, and yet supports decentralized, real-time operation. We solve this dilemma by recognizing that a task can be represented as a deterministic finite automaton, and that recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can encode numerous automata. This allows us to distill the logic and sequential decompositions of sub-tasks obtained from a language model into an RNN, and align its internal states with the semantics of a given task. This leads to a tiny model that encapsulates the reasoning of the language model and can be implemented onboard. To interpret the internal state of the RNN for a decentralized execution, we train a graph neural network control policy conditioned on the hidden states of the RNN and the language embeddings. We present evaluations on simulated and real-world multi-robot tasks that require sequential and collaborative behavior by the team, demonstrating scalable, robust, real-time performance -- sites.google.com/view/prompting-teams.

Large language models (LLMs) provide robots with richer task understanding and adaptability, making them promising for coordinating heterogeneous multi-robot systems in long-horizon tasks. Despite this potential, several challenges remain underexplored: (1) Centralized LLM schedulers scale poorly as team size and environmental complexity increase. A single model must process excessive contextual information, and long-context approximation may degrade reasoning quality; (2) Existing task formulations insufficiently consider dynamic settings, while robust adaptation to evolving task conditions is essential for real-world deployment; (3) Domain-specific data scarcity limits specialized robotic reasoning, making proprietary general-purpose models inefficient for expert tasks. To address these limitations, we propose DynaHMRC, a decentralized framework in which each robot acts as a role-aware LLM agent. This design mitigates the single-model context bottleneck and supports flexible collaboration across heterogeneous team configurations. DynaHMRC organizes collaboration as a four-stage closed-loop process: self-description, task allocation with leadership bidding, leader election, and reflective execution, supported by executable robot interfaces. We further develop a benchmark covering three task families, four dynamic variations, and six team configurations to systematically study dynamic task modeling. In addition, we conduct an empirical analysis to guide the construction of domain-specific expert datasets and fine-tune pretrained LLMs to improve specialized competence. Experiments show that DynaHMRC achieves higher success rates than strong baselines with fewer action and communication steps, while demonstrating promising scalability trends as team size grows within the evaluated settings.